Audition-style
revenge, Descent
tells the story of a promising young co-ed, Maya (Rosario Dawson), whose upward
academic trajectory is bumped off course in sudden, nasty fashion. After a week
of wooing by smooth-talking jock Jared (Chad Faust), Maya is date raped. She
then floats through summer in a glassy-eyed haze, shacking up with beefy drug
dealer Adrian (Marcus Patrick) before eventually returning to school as a
teacher’s assistant — a position that uncomfortably puts her back in contact
with Jared.
Working largely in tight, saturated close-ups, feature debut
writer-director Talia Lugacy gets around the need for large crowds of extras in
ways occasionally artful (the whispered run-through of a commencement ceremony)
but just as often awkward (a radio broadcast over an empty football stadium).
Lugacy takes her time with the material; this isn’t some tawdry version of a quick-plotted after-school special. Yet after a nice set-up, the middle of the film sags like the creaky floorboards of
a condemned house. You see a physical and emotional transformation in Maya —
she’s pallid and sullen — that more or less reinforces the arc of her acting
out. Yet there’s no correlative connection to this damage, largely the result
of Lugacy’s indulgence of far too many impressionistic musical sequences. It
all builds to a climax that’s both shocking and thought-provoking, but one that,
since it’s partially pegged to unknowable elements, only scratches the surface of the true, self-regenerating nature of victimization. Points for degree-of-difficulty effort,
then, trump execution, if only marginally. For the original capsule review, from CityBeat, click here and scroll down.
Variety is reporting that Christopher Walken and Alessandro Nivola have signed on for Five
Dollars a Day, a road movie to be directed by Nigel Cole (A Lot Like Love) which pits a con artist against his more
conservative son. Walken
will play a grifter-drifter who proudly lives like a king on the titular meager per diem, and Nivola
his offspring, who has recently been paroled from prison after serving time for one of his father’s crimes. I want to go on record right now: I like this pairing. Walken is like one of those exotically flavored Jelly Belly jellybeans — the shape and consistency remains the same, but you never quite know what you’re going to get — while the underrated Nivola (Laurel Canyon, Face/Off) is crafty and adaptable; I look forward to seeing him have a go at swallowed exasperation.
The Bourne Ultimatum star Matt Damon, the anarchic manner in which his signature film series
takes shape is an exception to the normal rules of production, and not
necessarily a technique to be emulated. “You know, it’s not an
advisable way to make a movie,” Damon confesses at a recent press
conference. “You couldn’t teach that in film school and send people out there. But it works for Paul, and there’s something
about the chaos and the alchemy of [producer] Frank Marshall and Paul Greengrass. But it should come with a stamp. It’s not an advisable way
to work if you want to live a long life.”
For returning director Greengrass, who secured an Oscar nomination for helming United 93 between making The Bourne Supremacy
and this film, the methods behind this sort of madness are rooted in
the material, as well as his penchant for shooting in handheld fashion,
frequently on location. “I think that in my films, and I’m not [saying]
across the board here, but it’s certainly true of The Bourne Ultimatum,” Greengrass says,
“you’re trying to bring together two forces that essentially are going
in opposite directions. And those two forces are structure, order,
planning, story — all the things you can lay down in advance
logistically, narratively, whatever it is. Then you’ve got the forces
of freedom, improvisation, ‘the moment,’ the happy accident — the
unstructured bits of filmmaking. …I think what I try to do all the time is bring those two [influences]
into the closest possible proximity, and where the two meet, that’s
where a Bourne movie should be,” he enthuses. “It means that they’re fresh, you know? A Bourne movie is not an airline meal, it’s made on the run.” For the full interview/feature, from FilmStew, click here.
Stardust is a diversionary
treat — a lively little pop fairytale that flits back and forth from one
colorful character to another. Reminiscent, in swatches, of Willow, The Princess Bride and The NeverEnding Story,
the movie is part comedic fantasy adventure yarn, part lilting romance about awakening to the love right in front of one’s eyes; it works best as a grab-bag of brightly colored whimsy and
wonderment.
In an attempt to win the heart of Victoria (Sienna Miller), the prettiest girl in the
sleepy English village of Wall, young Tristan Thorne (newcomer Charlie Cox, above right)
makes a wild-eyed promise to bring her back a fallen star. Crossing the ages-old
barrier that rings the city and gives it its name, Tristan enters a supernatural
parallel universe known as Stormhold. There, he discovers that the fallen star
is not an object, but actually a spirited young woman, Yvaine (Claire Danes),
injured by her cosmic tumble. Sought by both a handful of scheming princes vying to
secure the throne of their dying father (Peter O’Toole) as well as a powerful witch (Michelle Pfeiffer) desperate to use the star to achieve eternal youth and beauty for her
and her sisters, Yvaine rather disobligingly elopes
with Tristan on a series of incredible adventures heading back toward Wall, crossing paths along the way with a quirky
pirate, Captain Shakespeare (Robert De Niro), who may not be all he seems. Like a sure but slow-dawning sunrise, love eventually blossoms between the pair.
Penned by freshman scribe Jane Goldman and directed with a spry, light touch by Matthew Vaughn, Stardust greatly favors tone over particulars.
What differentiates Stormhold from Wall is never much explained, nor
the relationship between the two cities, or certain other character
bits; one either goes with the general flow of “fairytale questing” or
becomes stubbornly resistant to the entire affair. More pleasantly distractible than enthralling, Stardust lacks either the epic-scale frosting that a more experienced genre hand (like Peter Jackson) would give it, or the skewed, hallucinatory pop vibrancy of a bolder visual stylist (like Tim Burton). Overall, though, one can’t reasonably bear ill will toward the film, and they certainly can’t hold a grudge, not the least of which because Stardust is busy not taking itself at all that seriously. In sum,
there’s much, much more right here than wrong. For my full review, from Reelz, click here.
Lost amidst reporting on other forms of viral marketing is the fact that apparently Rush Hour 3 is advertising or sort of sponsoring, if you will, Sigalert, which is the coupled slang for the traffic and vehicular smash-up reporting service here in greater Los Angeles county. In addition to a little movie logo on their web freeway map, a couple days ago accidents — noted by differently colored diamonds on the screen — were also marked with a pop-up text card for the movie, in very small print. The latter no more — I guess someone made the point that you don’t want your movie literally associated with horrible accidents. Check it out by clicking here; who knows how long after opening weekend it’ll last.
So according to Reuters, multi-hyphenate husband collector Jennifer Lopez has just today won roughly $545,000 in the
arbitration of a lawsuit against her first husband over his plans to
publish a tell-all book about the star. Lopez was awarded $200,000 in damages for breach of contract,
$300,000 in attorneys’ fees and nearly $48,000 in arbitration costs. Noa’s
plans for a book were revealed in a January 2006 article in the New
York Post describing the proposed expose as a 12-chapter “tell-all
manuscript” under the title: The Unknown Truth: A Passionate Portrait
of a Serial Thriller. Noa, a restaurant and nightclub manager,
then offered not to publish the book if Lopez paid him $5 million, according
to Lopez’s suit.
Lopez should be financially set, of course, but bank is bank, and worth celebrating… even a paltry $200,000. And perhaps this will help console she and new husband Marc
Anthony over the reviews of their new film, El Cantante.
Babylon A.D., the ’70s-set movie charts the aspirant fortunes of an ABA franchise led by owner-player-coach Jackie Moon (Ferrell). Kent Alterman directs, from a screenplay by Scot Armstrong (Old School), and rounding out the rest of the cast are Woody Harrelson, Maura Tierney, Andre Benjamin, Andy Richter, Jackie Earle Haley, Rob Corddry and David Koechner. Oh, and Will Arnett too.
It’s an immediate eye-catcher, this poster, though I think they should have colored the jersey something other than white. It’s definitely a sign of Ferrell’s drawing power, too. Still, let’s all hope this doesn’t bring back the muttonchops…
I got an email from a friend last night asking about movies with Laura Linney (she’d apparently been crapping her pants after watching The Mothman Prophecies on cable), so I thought I’d re-post this slightly redacted DVD review of P.S., which originally ran in another publication that… oh, how shall we put it this time, has yet to provide completion funds. It isn’t among the best of her canon, but does showcase the fact that you never get a stupid or wrongheaded performance from Linney. To wit:
A movie to be acknowledged for its atypical potentiality
rather than praised for its execution, P.S.
is the second feature from Roger Dodger
helmer Dylan Kidd. Here Kidd adapts, with original author Helen Schulman, the
contemporary-set novel of the same name — the story of a thirtysomething art
school admissions officer at Columbia University, Louise Harrington (Linney), who meets with and falls for a student candidate, F. Scott Feinstadt
(Topher Grace), who bears an uncanny resemblance in name, physicality, passion
and spirit to her dead high school sweetheart. Together they embark on a
hesitant, awkward affair, all while Louise tries to discern whether F. Scott is
in fact the reincarnation of her former beau.
P.S. is an
independent movie in all the best senses of the word — thoughtful,
performance-centric and meticulously crafted — it’s just that it actually doesn’t
live up to the quiet hype of its premise, or even the sum of its parts. Linney is characteristically
fantastic, and Grace brings a quiet sensitivity and, well, grace to his role
that will help make him a huge movie star in the very near future. The other
actors, though — which include Paul Rudd as Louise’s brother Sammy, a recovering
drug addict; Gabriel Byrne as her colleague and ex-husband Peter, who still
harbors a dark secret; and best-friend-by-default Missy (Marcia Gay Harden), a
harridan and functional alcoholic — all seem underused and/or arbitrarily placed, emotional stimulators who drift in and out of the story whenever Louise needs
to be goosed. The film is much better put together, technically speaking, than
Kidd’s wordy, gimmick-driven debut, and augurs for a perhaps substantial and
successful filmmaking career where previously there might have been doubt. In
the end, though, that isn’t enough to recommend the movie, as it just doesn’t
hang together.
DVD extras include a fairly discerning and scholarly audio
commentary track from Kidd, and a collection of five excised/alternate scenes,
two of which are extended versions of what appears already in the film and
three of which were deleted entirely. Of these latter three, the exclusion of
the last — a seven-minute plus tête-à-tête between the two leads — intrinsically
changes the nature of the story. Kidd contends in optional audio commentary
that it was necessary to cut because, due to its setting, the scene’s inclusion
would infantilize F. Scott after he had, within the story, “become a man”
(Kidd’s wording). He has the germ of a point, but the trim comes at the expense
of Louise (it changes the prism through which you view her character) and the
movie as a whole. P.S. is still only
worth catching if you’re a huge fan of Linney or Grace, but watch these deleted
scenes only after the full film, and see if it doesn’t bump your estimation a
half-letter grade if they had been included. C- (Movie) C (Disc)
Justin Theroux (above right). It’s a sort of barbed love story about the pathologically bitter author of a popular children’s book series (Billy Crudup, above left) forced to team up with a new illustrator (Mandy Moore) after his best friend and creative collaborator (Tom Wilkinson) suddenly passes away.
It’s well directed, very idiosyncratic but totally genuine, and the characters
leave deep footprints. I’m a big fan of Crudup’s, and while the neurotic
misanthrope is a tried-and-true character of a certain brand of cinema, I
thought there was a sincerity and attention to detail in his performance that helps make the entire movie really sing. And Moore was
great too; she was good in American Dreamz, but definitely more in her comfort zone. This is flat-out her best performance… one so good that it made me forget
she was ever “first” a singer. Dedication opens in late August in New York and Los Angeles, and goes wide September 14, from the Weinstein Company.
At the recent press day for The Bourne Ultimatum, director Paul Greengrass talked about the
special, deferential contentment that his Oscar nomination for United 93 brought to him. “It was very
nice. I was actually on the set of Bourne Ultimatum at that time, and everybody was very nice,” says Greengrass. “It
meant a lot to me most of all because of the journey we took with all those
families. They were so incredibly supportive of us and it meant the world to
them. And of course on a personal level it was a great honor, but it meant most
because they felt acknowledged in this city, by Hollywood.
I think that was fantastic.”
Hancock, with Will Smith and Jason Bateman, from actor turned director Peter Berg (The Kingdom). Still, I think it’ll always have to be Monster that gets the most ink in Theron’s filmographies and hopefully long-off obituaries, at least until we collaborate on a home-made project. We’re destined for nothing long-term, though — I’ve listened to too much Third Eye Blind. No faultless saint, that Stephan Jenkins, but I think he probably met some crazy.
So according to Variety, 24-year-old looker Leelee Sobieski will be reteaming with her squirrelly Joy Ride costar Steve Zahn in the indie flick Night Train, also alongside Danny Glover.
Written and directed by Brian King, the movie is described as a thriller which centers around three strangers competing
for a mysterious object on a train on Christmas Eve. Presumably that object is not a used DVD copy of Reindeer Games. This is all fine and well, but the Sobieski film that everyone should be most looking forward to is Uwe Boll‘s In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale, which must be supported at all costs, including personal sanity. After all, how else do we get the full trilogy of that sword-and-sorcery videogame series?
At the recent press day for Stardust, in addition to
asking him about runaway producer credits and Beverly Hills Cop IV,
I asked former Warner Bros. executive turned independent producer Lorenzo di
Bonaventura (Transformers) about his forthcoming NowhereLand, pegged for a September 10
start date with star Eddie Murphy and director Karey Kirkpatrick, (Over the Hedge, Charlotte’s Web).
“It’s a father-daughter story,” says di Bonaventura, “and we
have great ambition to make a movie in the vein of Big or Jerry Maguire,
where it’s comedic but very, very heartfelt. It’s about a man who’s having some
issues, can’t connect with his daughter, doesn’t really understand her, and also
doesn’t really understand what’s happening to himself at work. And she has an
imaginary world that begins to intercede in his work, so he begins to value her
imaginary world not for her [before] he then comes to his senses.”
So basically it’s another in the vein of moralizing family movies that Murphy used to mock, except with the lack of a space between the title’s two words, to further irritate me. But isn’t this also basically just like the episode of The Simpsons where Homer takes
an interest in Lisa because she suddenly can do no wrong in picking weekly
football winners? Maybe Murphy’s taking these sorts of movies so that he can get paid and then just give bundled DVD sets of this, Daddy Day Care and The Haunted Mansion to all the kids that he fathers out of wedlock.
Lindsay Lohan, Britney Spears, Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie (the four whores of the apocalypse?) ruled the
tabloids with their tales of boozy excess, criminal mischief and the
like. That era was powered by Jennifer Lopez. The artist formerly known
as J. Lo owed her ubiquity partially to her high-profile relationship
with fellow actor Ben Affleck, naturally, but also to the fact that at every turn, she seemed to be
launching a fragrance or shooting a music video or opening a (generally
cruddy) movie or feting the opening of an Arby’s.
If there was a red
carpet, she was on it. No wonder so many people seemed eager to
celebrate her Hollywood downfall or demotion. That turbulent time is
not too far in the past, but Lopez — with the aid of new husband Marc
Anthony, her costar in El Cantante — is working hard to make sure it remains in the rearview
mirror. “Marc helped me with this in the beginning,” she confesses in a recent interview.
“I just didn’t know there was another way to live.”
“At that time, I
was like, ‘I’m going to live my life, I’m not going to let this change
me,’” Lopez continues. “But you’re out there and then all this stuff is
happening to you and you’re on the cover of the tabloid every week. And
you’re like, ‘Wait a minute, this is not working in the way that I want
it to work.’” For the full feature piece, from FilmStew, click here.
The HollyShorts Film Festival, an
annual short film festival showcasing the best and brightest short films from
around the globe, takes place August
10-12, 2007 in Hollywood. Opening night is Friday, August 10 and features the Hollywood premiere of Entourage star Adrian Grenier’s short
film Euthanasia, at Nacional, located
at 1645 Wilcox Ave.
Hosted by LATV’s VJ Viviana Vigil, the festival will feature an action-packed
showcase of 58 short films, along with a creative panel on Saturday, August 11
and a business panel on Sunday, August 12 at the Cinespace Digital Superclub in
Hollywood. The closing night party will be hosted by legendary hip hop emcee Biz
Markie. Festival day passes are $20. For all other information, click here.
I’ve written before about Home Improvement,
and many other like-minded meat-and-potatoes sitcoms of the 1980s and ’90s, and
it’s shows like these that most bear out the maxim that one man’s trash is
another’s treasure.
Well, “treasure” is overstating it. Maybe “trash” too,
actually. The notion of comfort food might be a more appropriate comparison.
Just as there are times when hunger strikes independent of the ability to make another decision at the tail end of a
long day, and one finds themselves at a local haunt picking up the same
take-out they’ve ordered a hundred times before, there are also times — many
times, it turns out, and for many people — when the thought of actively
grappling with something like new characters or narrative nuance is as big of a
turn-off as a pre-liposuction Roseanne Barr in a floss-thin thong.
Home Improvement, at least in many of its
earlier incarnations. But as this collection of the show’s seventh go-round
reflects, blue-collar inspiration has a certain shelf life. Spanning 25 episodes,
this season of the Detroit-set show finds Tim “The Toolman” Taylor (Tim Allen) scoring box seats to a Thanksgiving
pro football game, where he somehow manages to cause a blackout. Tim’s eldest
son Brad (Zachery Ty Bryan) almost gets hitched in the episode “An Older
Woman.” Tim’s wife Jill (Patricia Richardson, who received her fourth Emmy
nomination this season) makes some rather inappropriate comments about her
husband’s fix-it-up television show in “From Top to Bottom,” while wise but
rarely seen neighbor Wilson (Earl Hindman) goes face-to-face with an alien in
“Believe It or Not.” Rounding out the cast are Tim’s mischievous younger sons
Randy (Jonathan Taylor Thomas) and Mark (Taran Noah Smith), with former Family Feud host Richard Karn costarring
as Tim’s unflappably upbeat, flannel-wearing Tool Time sidekick, Al Borland. The parade of guest stars includes
appearances from Dan Akroyd, habitually injured NBA “superstar” Grant Hill and
astronauts Ken Bowersox and Steve Hawley
Home Improvement
co-creators Matt Williams and Carmen Finestra previously wrote for iconic ’80s
sitcom The Cosby Show, so their work
retains much of that show’s good-heartedness, if not quite the same aplomb with
which the requisite “very special episodes” are handled. Home Improvement was, of course, originally inspired by some of Allen’s
standup comedy, but little of that kick remains here — just familiar sitcom
stories with a pinch of watered-down familial drama, carried along by charisma
and goodwill. Allen has gone on to film quasi-stardom, with box office hits
like Wild Hogs and The Santa Clause franchise, proving
that he knows his audience. Here, they know him too. And that’s just the way
they like it.
Some of Home
Improvement’s previous DVD incarnations came in novelty cases, or at least somewhat
imaginative packaging (a buzzsaw half-slipcase, etcetera), but the seventh
season’s release sees no such fancifulness. Presented in a 1.33:1 aspect ratio
(that would full-screen), the set’s Dolby digital stereo audio track is
certainly more than adequate to handle the skimpy requirements of the series’ sound
design. There are a few times when some cockamamie scheme of Tim’s blows up in
his face, either figuratively or literally, but these bits are conveyed through
volume and aural smash cuts, not really much fading or layering. Spread out
over three discs, this compilation’s only supplemental extra consists of a new blooper
reel comprised of the funniest outtakes from the 1997-1998 season. Flubbed
lines lead to some consternation, but unlike, say, Chris Tucker in every Rush Hour movie, at least no one leaves
their cell phone on. To order the set via Amazon, click here. C (Show) C+ (Disc)
So wait… gun-for-hire filmmaker Brett Ratner has accidentally gotten blowjobs from dudes pretending to be chicks? (And it’s happened to his friends, plural, as well?) That’s according to an interview with The Advocate, in which Ratner explains/defends a joke in the forthcoming, relatively uninspired Rush Hour 3 (more on this later this week). “That’s from my personal experience,” says Ratner. “My first blowjob was from a man, but I didn’t know it was a man. That’s where that comes from, it’s based on personal experience.”
“That happens to a lot of heterosexuals — you meet a girl in a bar, and it turns out she’s not a girl,” continues Ratner (After the Sunset, X-Men: The Last Stand). So that happens a lot? I’d argue its prevalence, I guess, though Ratner and I doubtlessly run with slightly different crowds. And this is exactly what freaks out Bible-belt Americans about Hollywood — the ridiculous notion of homosexuals and transsexuals as nothing but rampant tricksters out to dupe them or take unfair advantage.
I’m not sure what this says about ex-crush Rebecca Gayheart, really. But, well… who says Ratner doesn’t make personal movies, then? That’s one less criticism that can be leveled against him.
The trailer for Lions for Lambs, set for release November 9 through MGM, is up and running, and thankfully gone is the awful music from its first pass, in teaser form. It doesn’t look like quite Frank “T.J.” Mackey territory for Tom Cruise, but he is playing another silver-tongued aggressor, this time a hot-shit U.S. Senator. (Anyone else think Cruise could topline the David Vitter story if he so chose?) It’s no great fleshing out of the narrative, particularly. In fact, with Robert Redford barking, “Rome is burning, son,” and the trailer’s hammering home of terrorism being “the quintessential question of our time,” Lions for Lambs is certainly going to no significant lengths to sell itself to the hoi polloi; right now it’s The Charlie Rose Show and Meet the Press crowd or bust. Watch for at least a bit of a narrative expansion of sorts in probably about a month or six weeks.
Matt Damon and amnesiac CIA assassin Jason Bourne, né David Webb — the tightly coiled, pit-bull seeker at the heart of the hard-charging Bourne trilogy.
Damon isn’t short, per se, but his compact frame hardly gives off the air of someone who’s a professional killer. What Damon does have is a swallowed intensity and intellectual awareness of his surroundings, and he impresses these traits upon Bourne, hardening his close-set eyes to match a clenched jaw of resoluteness. With Damon, you see the whirring inner motor of Jason Bourne, as he absorbs information at a high rate of speed and then translates that into both rapid analysis and breathless action. Despite any and all story points, he is the jockey driving this series, exhorting it forward in inexorable fashion. The utterly absorbing The Bourne Ultimatum, then, finally delivers some redemption for Bourne, even if it’s chiefly of the cold-comfort variety. For the review of the film, click here.
The Saw series is always good at stirring up controversy, be it of the mock, pre-release variety or irritation in the critical community through some inane attempts to enforce an after-release review embargo. Its latest stirring of the pot falls in the former category, and comes from returning series director Darren Lynn Bousman and producer Mark Burg, in advance of Saw IV, releasing October 26.
Images from the film had previously been leaked, but I was talking with a colleague who’d been to the recent panel presentation at Comic-Con with the above, and he passed along how they said that the first cut of the film had been given an NC-17 rating by the MPAA, and that therefore the producers and distributor LionsGate had to decide whether to make trims or release the film with that rating. <roll of the eyes> Please… come on. This bit may or may not be true (it’s actually immaterial), but the fourth installment of a hugely commercial franchise will not be rated and released in NC-17 form, thereby drastically limiting its earnings potential. This is a completely transparent attempt at the manual stimulation of its hardcore audience, but one that should be recognized even by that set. I mean, is there anything “shocking” left for them to say? Other than maybe they’re setting up Saw V to be a full-fledged musical? For an in-depth description of the clip previewed at Comic-Con — a sort of nouveau human quartering, it seems — click here.
The second youngest of 11 siblings, Manny Perez was born in
a small town in the Dominican Republic,
before moving at the age of 10 with his family to Rhode
Island. He would later study drama at Marymount ManhattanCollege,
but those years of fighting for familial attention in theatrical fashion have
paid off in a big way, as 2007 sees no fewer than six films featuring Perez
hitting screens.
August itself provides a high-profile one-two punch, in the
form of the just-released El Cantante,
a biopic of salsa legend Hector Lavoe starring Marc Anthony and Jennifer Lopez, and the John
Singleton-produced urban shoot-’em-up Illegal
Tender.
Perez is perhaps most high, though, on writer-director Alejandro
Gomez Monteverde’s Bella, the
People’s Choice Award winner at last year’s Toronto Film Festival, in which he
stars with Tammy Blanchard, Eduardo Verástegui and Ali Landry. “Bella is about a day in the life of a
waitress, a restaurant owner, which is me, and his brother, who’s a chef, and
what happens in that day and what they learn about life — how they learn how to
love life instead of just [getting caught up in] their conflicts,” he says.
“It’s one of those feel-good stories, set in New York City.”
“They say that since this film won the Toronto Film Festival
— in the past, films that have won, like Chariots
of Fire and Crash, I think some
other things, have gone on to be nominated for an Oscar,” Perez continues. “So,
I don’t know if that’s the case, but I truly feel that the film itself, the
storyline, is very Oscar-worthy.”
War is still making headlines, of course, and with Richard Shepard’s quite excellent The Hunting Party looming on the horizon (more on this soon), I thought I’d re-post this review of 2001’s No Man’s Land. To wit:
Writer-director Danis Tanovic’s film opens with a group of Bosnian soldiers, ostensibly on a relief mission, lost in a thick, soupy battlefield fog. It’s an apt visual metaphor for No Man’s Land, a well-acted, thoughtfully constructed tragicomic exploration of just how murky all-consuming hate can be, even among starkly pronounced enemies.
Set in 1993 during the height of the Bosnian civil war, No Man’s Land takes its title from where its lead characters find themselves trapped. When the aforementioned fog dissipates and the Serbs open fire, reneging on a tentative peace accord, a T-shirt-clad fighter named Ciki (Branko Djuric) survives and manages to make his way to an abandoned ditch in between the two entrenched fronts. When the Serbian commander sends two of his soldiers to check the trench, Ciki hides and they find nothing. Before they leave, the duo set a booby trap, laying one of the dead Bosnian soldiers on a spring mine so that when his comrades find his body and move it, they too will be killed. As they finish the job, they notice that an abandoned rifle there minutes before is now missing; someone is in the trench with them. Cornered, Ciki springs from his hiding place, killing one of the Serb soldiers and wounding the other, a shiny-pated rookie named Nino (Rene Bitorajac). Rather than finish Nino off, however, Ciki spares him, figuring he may be a useful bargaining tool.
Adrien Brody), frustrated by the stultifying inaction of his United Nations superiors, who include the rather obviously named Colonel Soft (Four Weddings and a Funeral’s Simon Callow).
Much more than just an absurdist predicament, No Man’s Land manages to pull moments both light (the soldiers call the UN peacekeepers “smurfs” because of their light blue helmets) and grim — as well as always human — from its set-up. Ciki and Nino’s arguments are at first very straightforward and didactic, but as the film moves away from speechifying and into more illustrative examples of their (assumed) differences, it really gathers steam.
Plenty of films of this type, in which two mortal enemies are confined to specific quarters, have rosy and/or oversimplified worldviews that usually translate into cloying, pat resolutions. If everyone would just get together and talk, really get to know the so-called enemy, these optimistic films tell us, then things would be better, everyone would see how similar we really are to our neighbor. The small but crowning victory of No Man’s Land, Bosnia’s official entry for the foreign languageAcademy Award, is that while Ciki and Nino forge an uneasy alliance for joint benefit, they never fully trust one another, they never give in to the absurdity of their situation. Yet No Man’s Land isn’t darkly pessimistic by any stretch (indeed, an opening exchange defines the difference between pessimists and optimists as being that the first always thinks things could be worse, while the latter knows they can be). It’s simply steeped in a recognizable vanity and humanity largely lacking in many pictures of its ilk — qualities that lend the film an inordinate amount of gravity. To purchase the film on DVD via Amazon, click here. (United Artists, R, 97 minutes)
It’s a happy birthday to Billy Bob Thornton, who turns 52 today. I’m not sure what the hell happened to Mr. Woodcock,
his comedic collaboration with Susan Sarandon and Seann William Scott
previously slated for release this past January, but on the surface the
latter should prove a more interesting foil than Jon Heder in School for Scoundrels, which was kind of all over the map.
Regardless of whether or not he’s truly taking sly digs at his ex-wife,Thornton is a great interview because of his folksy bluntness — just a genuine, down-to-Earth type of guy.
He one time phoned a colleague of mine for an interview about his debut
CD, recalled talking to me from about four months earlier and then,
though I assured him he could phone back, proceeded to chat movies with
me for 10-15 minutes, until my late-arriving colleague showed up.
Andy Samberg, Jorma Taccone and Akiva Schaffer scored positions at Saturday Night Live — Samberg as a performer and the latter two as writers. Less than two years later, a movie they’ve done together (that would be Hot Rod) is coming out and one of their more robustly received digital shorts for SNL, the raunchy R&B parody Dick in a Box, just received an unlikely Emmy nomination. (Imagine that being performed live.)
While all three Lonely Island guys — friends since junior high
school — have enjoyed a huge bump in profile, it’s Samberg, as the
“face” of the trio, who stands poised to break out as a bonafide new
comedy star, and with that face down all the fresh challenges it
creates. Still, the steep upward trajectory doesn’t seem to bother him, and in making the leap from SNL to movies — a perilous chasm that not all have survived with grace or dignity —
Samberg seems to be taking a decided long view of things. “For people that
I’ve looked up to, they have all gone through ebbs and flows in their
movie careers,” he says. “Now that I’m actually in it a little
bit, I understand the desire to do something different. Even as early
as now, having done [just] this movie, I think personally I want to
keep doing weird stuff. I don’t think I have really proven myself in
terms of comedy yet.”
The Hollywood Reporter is reporting today that, in a civil trial watched closely by those in the film industry, a jury returned a verdict ordering Warner Bros. to pay producers Alan Ladd Jr. and Jay Kanter $3.2
million in revenue from a series of movies licensed in packages to TV
and cable stations. Hollywood accounting and other chicanery has long been a point of contention, but does anyone really think this is going to change things on balance?
After all, immediately after the verdict, a Warner Bros. spokesperson issued a statement that read, in part: “While we are disappointed by the jury’s verdict,
we understand their confusion over damages. We will now look at this
entire proceeding, and hope to rectify this erroneous decision at this
level or on appeal.”