Monthly Archives: February 2012

Incendiary: The Willingham Case

A murder mystery, forensic investigation and political drama rolled into one, the new-to-DVD Incendiary: The Willingham Case shines a spotlight on the circumstances surrounding Cameron Todd Willingham, a Texas man convicted in the arson deaths of his three young children. Somewhat flatly told but engaging throughout, this documentary will appeal to both newsmagazine junkies and those impassioned by the death penalty debate.



In 1991, an early morning house fire in Corsicana, Texas felled a two-year-old girl and twin infants. Their father, the only other person home at the time, escaped. Charged and convicted largely on shaky arson evidence, Willingham was sentenced to death for the murder of his kids. Despite expert criticism of the prosecutor’s “junk science,” he was executed in 2004. Incendiary focuses largely on the aftermath of that verdict and event, and attempts to win a posthumous reversal of Willingham’s conviction based on fire investigation evidence and a look at the alleged manipulation of a post-mortem state forensics commission stacked by former Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry.

The film, which enjoyed its world premiere last year at the SXSW Festival, where it picked up a special jury prize, certainly makes a persuasive case for the political cronyism of Perry — though the Texas governor is hardly the first politician to dismiss state board appointees in favor of old pals and/or more ideologically like-minded. Whether that amounts to a more sinister cover-up is doubtful, and something of a stretch (and not part of the movie’s agenda, really). Incendiary is most convincing in its evidence concerning the faulty diagnosis of arson, upon which the murder case was obviously based. Dr. Gerald Hurst (above) and John Lentini are intelligent and articulate experts in the field, and they debunk the initial fire investigation report in crisp, relatable fashion.

Still, a weird (and white-hot) amount of outright hostility comes off of Willingham’s own defense attorney, David Martin, who sounds like Hank Hill from King of the Hill and makes no bones about his own beliefs of Willingham’s guilt, even as roosters crow wildly in the background. One could reasonably entertain the argument that such feelings could only be influenced by personal certitude and outrage over the sort of detailed confession that would be protected by attorney-client privilege. Co-directors Steve Mims and Joe Bailey give White a fair shake — he’s the skeptic in their midst — but don’t go out of their way to contextualize, frame and either bolster or refute other evidence against Willingham — like conflicting statements to police and, most particularly, an alleged confession to his wife, the mother of the children. In its failure to address these issues, Incendiary feels a bit incomplete as a true crime tale.

In fact, Paradise Lost this isn’t. The filmmakers have the benefit of tremendously convincing experts (in particular Hurst, a physicist, speaks eloquently of the fact that so many fire investigators have no educational anchor points for elementary science), but they seem afraid of subjecting their feelings on the case to a more rigorous and thorough examination. The transition, halfway through, to a more gear-grinding procedural does not seem to suit the movie. It’s not that Incendiary feels like a politically opportunistic hit piece; it isn’t. It’s just that the criminal investigation and “CYA” political maneuvering that ensues feel less like two sides of the same coin and a bit more like adjacent screw-ups. One thing can be certain, however — guilty or not, you don’t want to be charged with a homicide in Texas.

Housed in a regular plastic Amaray case, Incendiary: The Willingham Case comes to DVD presented in 16×9 widescreen, with a Dolby digital 5.1 surround sound audio track that more than adequately handles the movie’s straightforward aural demands. Split into 35 chapters under a motion-menu main screen, Incendiary also includes a copy of its trailer, plus 15 minutes of interview footage with the co-directors in which they discuss the intersection of law, science and politics that first intrigued them about the case, and then talk about how the scope of the film changed with the unanticipated political theater of the January 2010 firings of members of the state forensics commission. They also address the purported confession mentioned by Willingham’s ex-wife, and make smart, salient points about how it differs from earlier statements to the press, and came at a hastily arranged courthouse-steps press conference — absent any follow-up questions — just prior to voting in Perry’s re-election bid. To purchase a copy of the DVD, click here. For more information on the movie, including its trailer, click here. B (Movie) B (Disc)

Correction:
An earlier version of this article misidentified Willingham’s defense attorney as David White instead of David Martin. It has since been corrected.

Eat This New York


Director Andrew Rossi’s Page One: Inside the New York Times was tremendously well received, lauded for providing a snapshot of both “the Grey Lady” specifically and a newspaper industry teetering on the edge of (ir)relevance in a digital age. Eat This New York, from First Run Features, is another geographically specific subcultural nonfiction curio from Rossi that will receive wider embrace amongst so-called foodies.

The rise in profile of the Food Network, along with all sorts of cooking and baking cable shows on other channels, has created a burgeoning interest in high-class cuisine, and food trends and even chefs in cities we may not inhabit. (Though it’s merely anecdotal, for evidentiary purposes I offer up my sisters, who lives in Washington, D.C., but knows the restaurants in at least five other cities of her favorite Spanish chef.) Featuring culinary luminaries like Daniel Boulud, Sirio Maccioni, Keith McNally, Drew Nieporent, Danny Meyer and Jean-Georges Vongerichten, Eat This New York tells the story of two friends, Billy Phelps and John McCormick, struggling to try to open a new restaurant in the food capital of the world — where there are over 18,000 eateries, and four-fifths of the 1,000 new ones that open each 12 months go out of business in the first five years.

Rossi’s tack is relaxed and inviting, and it certainly helps that he’s chosen two sympathetic figures for his chief subjects. But one of the more heartening things about the movie, despite the appetites it raises, is that it’s not merely a tunnel-vision portrait of dreamy aspirations. Rossi lends voice to these kitchen artisans, heretofore so frequently banished to back rooms, and their insights are interesting, as they often reflect eloquently and offer up not just ideas about what tastes good but also the many other elements that go into creating a dining atmosphere that can capture the imagination and survive beyond the hype associated with an opening rush. Rossi’s film is slim (about 85 minutes), and doesn’t overstay its welcome, but is more filling than a simple appetizer.

Eat This New York comes to DVD housed in a regular plastic Amaray case, and is presented in 1.78:1 widescreen. Its bonus roster is meaty, too — over two hours of extended interviews with some of the country’s top restaurateurs. To purchase the DVD via Amazon, click here. B (Movie) B+ (Disc)

Happy Birthday, Noureen DeWulf

It’s a happy birthday as well to the striking Noureen DeWulf, now 28. I stumbled across part of The Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard on television recently, and said “Hell-o!” But I still couldn’t place what else I’d seen DeWulf in. American Dreamz, maybe? No firm memories there, really. It turns out it was The Taqwacores, actually. Here’s to more of her, and if it’s in ensembles like the one above then so be it.

The Forgiveness of Blood

Winner of the Silver Bear Award for Best Screenplay at last year’s Berlin Film Festival, The Forgiveness of Blood, from writer-director Joshua Marston (Maria Full of Grace), details a simmering contempt between two present day Albanian clans — think the Montagues and Capulets, minus any love story — that boils over into a blood feud that slowly rips a family apart when a land dispute leaves one man dead. Like 2009’s The Stoning of Soraya M and Ajami, as well as a small handful of other foreign films, Marston’s movie shines a light on religiously imputed dictums of punishment that may seem harsh (not to mention downright strange) to Western audiences, but does so in a way that never betrays the wider inclusiveness of its thematic inquiry.

Movies like this and Asghar Farhadi’s Oscar-nominated A Separation — one of the best films of 2011, regardless of nationality — possess a special level of import and consequence beyond their simple narrative bonafides, because they underscore the universality of their conflicts and the fact that, governmental saber-rattling notwithstanding, young people of every ethnicity have an innate desire to quell the conflicts and divergences that so roil their parents. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. (IFC Films/Sundance Selects, PG-13, 109 minutes)

Act of Valor

The long history of cooperation by the United States military with Hollywood productions lionizing their professionalism and technological/weaponry superiority reaches new heights in Act of Valor, a movie being marketed chiefly via its hook of using real, active-duty American special forces personnel. The relative strengths and weaknesses one might attach to such a tack are in abundant supply throughout. If the word propaganda strikes some as too punitive or uncomfortable a description, then the dramatically inert but generally well captured film, in its unerring, square-jawed patriotism and tidy action-oriented conflict resolution, is certainly the most expensive and exclusively sourced military recruitment video to date. For the full, original review, from Screen International, click here. (Relativity Media, PG-13, 101 minutes)

Why Aren’t Movie Aggregators Getting Better, and Smarter?

Over at The Wrap, Joshua Weinstein has up a piece on movie aggregators, and whether they “matter,” looking at Rotten Tomatoes, Metacritic and Movie Review Intelligence. It’s a nice but not particularly deep or instructive thumbnail-type read, mainly because it doesn’t get into the substantive failings — or shortcomings, at least — of each aforementioned site.

Aggregators are enormously important, of course, because they can both help connect readers to new writers and allow them to more easily follow their favorites. The oldest, biggest and unarguably most populist is Rotten Tomatoes, of course, in which all critics (500-plus, they say) are created equal. Metacritic (which is owned by CBS Interactive) assigns scores to its 44 polled critics, as well as to their reviews; the greater a critic’s stature, the more influential that critic’s opinion is on the overall Metacritic score. Movie Review Intelligence, meanwhile, rates and weighs its supposed 51 polled publications (though there seem to be a lot more on its site) by readership.

While providing some modicum of sifted elitism that places it above the riff-raff of bloggerdom (one assumes no honest Tea Partier could check either of these sites), neither of the latter two sites seems to have hit upon quite the right formula. While the more manageable numbers allow for greater shades of grey in their filmic rankings (as opposed to Rotten Tomatoes’ yea-nay system), they hardly seem inclusive or representative enough, geographically or culturally, for a true, digital-age canvassing.

And what of their measurements — for MRI, how frequently are readerships audited, and by what means? Is a print subscription base the same as readership, and/or how is that stacked up and weighed against more discretely measured web traffic? (Their critics roster, meanwhile, is littered with infrequent contributors to name-brand publications.) Even more elusive is Metacritic’s somewhat dodgy notion of “stature.” Is it a zero-sum game? As one critic’s stature or star rises, does another’s have to necessarily wane? Who watches the watchmen, in other words — sitting astride the cultural world as arbiters of approved opinion?

The best formula, as yet untapped, seems somewhere in the middle. Like it or not, as full-time single outlet perches further dwindle, film critics and those otherwise professionally assaying culture will become de facto free agents, employed full-time by a small(er) number of outlets but also free (and wise) to write on their own, and/or pitch out special pieces. Rotten Tomatoes might do well to bring in a nominal multiplier to its formula, to apply to heavy-volume reviewers who see and write about more films annually. But its system (even with more rigorous application standards than it first had in its heyday) is still the most egalitarian and useful, and ergo not by accident the most popular with consumers. It astounds me that, given all the hyper-generational advances in SEO and other arenas on the web, movie aggregator sites have not done a better job in tweaking their formulas and managing their own growth. Hopefully they turn an eye toward that in the short-term future, because social media massage is not a skill set with which all writers are naturally equipped. For The Wrap’s full read, click here.

Blank City

The angry, dirty and unforgiving streets of New York City have over the course of several generations taken on an almost mythical role in American independent cinema, fueling some artists, creatively bankrupting many more, and driving others into the arms of more lucrative, mainstream projects. An exhaustively comprehensive oral history of outsider cinema from the late 1970s and into the mid ’80s, Celine Danhier’s Blank City unfolds in all the hazy, erudite specificity of some breezy, memories-laden conversation between your parents and a bunch of their friends at some holiday party from your youth. Meaning, you ask? Meaning it’s kind of interesting in retrospect, or on a theoretical level, but also somewhat impenetrable, given everyone’s penchant for inside jokes and thorough (and thoroughly unedited) recollection.

Against the backdrop of scuzzy, economically bombed-out Lower East Side landscapes, powered by cheap dope and speed, and inspired by the cinematic rules-breaking of the French New Wave, a certain DIY ethos took root in the latter days of the Ford Administration. A renegade collection of aspirant filmmakers, musicians, amateur actors and other artistically-minded misfits would, over the next dozen years or so, crank out all sorts of stark and provocative outsider films, in what would come to be known as the No Wave. Some filmmakers and performers (including Jim Jarmusch and Steve Buscemi, the latter pictured above) would go on to greater fame with more accessible work, while others (Deborah Harry) would almost reluctantly find success in other arenas. Most, however, found their potential careers (to the extend they regarded them as such, and anything more than a way to fill their time) eventually derailed by jealousies and recklessness. The quirky work they left behind, though — long on alienation, often short on production value, rich in deadpan humor, and blurring the lines between fiction and nonfiction — holds some interesting lessons for would-be independent filmmakers of future generations.

Neophyte French director Danhier has an obvious passion for the material, but lacks the ability the form a cogent narrative spine from all of her interviews. As such, the movie unfolds in largely lurching fashion. Some of the anecdotes are amusing, and fascinating for the simplistic yet radical notions they hold at their core. Director James Naren talks about craftily arranging to see a property he had no intention of renting (or of course even the means to afford), then surreptitiously leaving the windows unlocked, coming back later that evening, climbing up the fire escape with his friends and cohorts, sneaking in, and shooting part of his avant-garde Rome 78. Later, Naren also talks about a lack of overt manipulation being of paramount importance to he and most of the rest of his filmmaking peers, and if bad acting or filmmaking was resultant from that, so be it, that was fine.

The widescale (at least within this group) embrace of this sort of seat-of-your-pants filmmaking makes for some interesting sidebar speculation amongst cineastes, especially if there had been more formalistically and narratively adventurous parties pushing back against some of their peers. But Danhier has trouble taking this microclimate (one interview participant describes the area between 14th Street and Houston, and Avenue B and Bowery as his entire world) and making it matter to the layperson, or connecting it in meaningful and convincing fashion to the cinema of today. Bolstered by film clips from literally dozens of No Wave offerings, Blank City proves itself several times over a vital document of this outsider movement, even if mainstream interest in such a trip down memory road is likely to remain at a significant remove.

Housed in a regular plastic Amaray case, Blank City comes to DVD presented in 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen, with a Dolby digital 5.1 surround sound audio track. Director Danhier submits to a 10-minute interview chat, in which she credits a compilation album from Brian Eno as first tipping her off to the existence of the No Wave scene. She also offers her own perspective, somewhat academic and removed, as to some of the figurehead personalities of the movement. The perspective and presence of an additional film historian would have been a nice touch here, but Danhier is obviously well versed enough of the subject to give it a fairly good framing. The big bonus feature, though, is a nice 40-minute collection of deleted and extended interviews, which allows even further indulgence for those really into this era and sub-genre. Outtakes and the movie’s theatrical trailer, meanwhile, round out the supplemental slate. For more information, visit Kino’s web site; to purchase the DVD via Amazon, click here. C (Movie) B (Disc)

Thin Ice




A kind of mash-up, slightly more poker-faced version of some of the same snowy ethical dilemmas faced in A Simple Plan, Fargo and The Ice Harvest, crime dramedy Thin Ice delivers a winning, if rather drolly underplayed, black comedy that tosses its protagonist into a pit of moral quicksand, and then chronicles his flailing attempts to extricate himself. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. (Art Takes Over, R, 94 minutes)

Rampart



By all accounts, Woody Harrelson, Ben Foster and director Oren Moverman developed an unusually strong bond during their work together on 2009’s The Messenger, a gritty, character-rooted drama about the difficulties and emotional turbulence faced by a pair of soldiers — one a veteran, one new to the assignment — who work as part of the Army’s notification team for the next of kin of deceased soldiers. The film netted Harrelson a Best Supporting Actor Oscar nomination (and a Best Original Screenplay nod to boot), and so the trio reteamed for Rampart, co-written and directed by Moverman, starring Harrelson, and co-produced by Foster, who also pops up in a small supporting role.

A “bad cop” drama somewhat in the vein of Street Kings and Narc, and a sort of West Coast companion to (either version of) Bad Lieutenant, Rampart, set in 1999, centers on an arrogant, chauvinistic and otherwise prejudiced police officer who finds the sins of his hotheadedness and long accepted procedural shortcuts finally closing in and crumbling down around him. If a bit short on psychological perspicacity, Moverman’s movie at least provides a solid vehicle of display for Harrelson’s squirrelly, off-kilter intensity. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. (Millennium, R, 107 minutes)

Nothing Like Chocolate


With the lead-up to Valentine’s Day comes the requisite flood of commercials for teddy bears and flowers, yes, but especially Whitman’s Samplers and other boxed chocolates. In fact, probably more chocolate is gifted on February 14 than on any other single day of the year. But how many happy recipients will necessarily spend much time thinking about where their chocolate came from, and whether it was produced in a fashion that ethically compensates the farmers who harvest the cacao beans used in that manufacturing? The humane and engaging new documentary Nothing Like Chocolate, fresh off a much buzzed-about Santa Barbara Film Festival presentation, shines a light on the gulf between first-world manufacturers and consumers of chocolate and the for the most part third-world growers and producers of said delights.



Director Kum-Kum Bhavnani gives voice to boutique chocolatiers who either cannot or won’t wade into this ethical pool (Gary Guittard provides an eloquent defense), and also illuminates the complicated process by which chocolates and other items achieve “fair trade” status. Still other interviewees, including former Grenada Prime Minister Maurice Bishop, speak intelligently about both central subject Mott Green (locals call him “Smilo,” the name under which Green’s company markets its chocolate powder) and the larger considerations driving him, making for an engaging movie that provokes both the brain and the taste buds. For more information about the film, click here; for more information about the Grenada Chocolate Company and Cooperative, meanwhile, click here. And for the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. (Nothing Like Chocolate LLC, unrated, 63 minutes)

This Means War

A mirthless, preening action comedy populated with gorgeous caricatures, This Means War isn’t so much an imitation of life as it is a setpiece-focused aping of other movies that have more sincerely attempted to commingle spy or assassin hijinks, gunplay and romance, like Mr. & Mrs. Smith, Knight & Day, Bad Boys and The Whole Nine Yards. Directed by McG, it’s indefatigably paced but consistently insulting to viewers’ intelligence.

This Means War bears much in common with the slick, colorful fantasy worlds of McG’s Charlie’s Angels movies, as well as work he has overseen on the small screen, like Fastlane, The O.C. and Chuck. The look is polished, and favors kinetic movement and unremarked upon opulence over sense. The action “sizzle” arrives via occasional cheery blasts of brainless, bloodless, consequence-free shootouts, designed so as not to challenge or offend. For the full, original review, from Screen International, click here. (20th Century Fox, PG-13, 97 minutes)

Jean Dujardin, Nicolas Cage Provide SNL Uplift


The “Les Jeunes de Paris” segment on Saturday Night Live last night, offering a tip of the cap to The Artist by way of Jean Dujardin’s guest spot with host Zooey Deschanel, was a fantastic little slice of referential show business self-love. Great Nicolas Cage cameo, too, in the show’s “Get In the Cage” segment with Andy Samberg. It’s that self-awareness and embrace of the outlandish that prevents so much of the stink of some of his film choices from sticking to him.

Director Liza Johnson Talks War Drama Return

A lot of military stories ladle on audio-visual artifice, in an attempt to create impactful audience identification with the disorienting nature of war or its psychological after-effects. Return, however, is a subjective document that plays out against the banality of everyday existence, wherein crisis unfolds in slow motion, and sometimes almost imperceptible strokes. The film stars Linda Cardellini as Kelli, a Rust Belt supply line soldier who comes back from a tour of duty and experiences a vague, free-floating sense of dislocation from her plumber husband Mike (Michael Shannon) and two young girls, and in the din of domestic homecoming dramas, it’s a striking, humane, low-fi offering. Speaking recently by phone with director Liza Johnson from her home in Brooklyn, I had a chance to discuss the 25-day shoot of her narrative debut effort, as well as her path to filmmaking, her planned next project, and the secrets of playing drunk on screen. The conversation is excerpted over at ShockYa, so click here for the full read. For a review of the movie, click here.

Wim Wenders Talks Pina, the Future of 3-D

While many directors are all too content to mine a seam, German-born filmmaker Wim Wenders (Wings of Desire, The Buena Vista Social Club, Paris, Texas, the ambitious Until the End of the World) has enjoyed a delightfully diverse career, jumping back and forth between narrative and nonfiction works. His latest film, the Best Foreign Language Film Oscar-nominated documentary Pina, taps into his decades-long friendship with the late, lauded choreographer Pina Bausch, imaginatively exploring her work in 3-D by utilizing the dancers of her Tanztheater Wuppertal ensemble. In a wide-ranging half-hour chat — with Dave Matthews Band, the Yeah Yeahs and other light rock tunes unfolding at a remove in the background of the lush outdoor trappings of a Hollywood hotel — I had a chance recently to talk to Wenders about his friendship with Bausch, the challenges of capturing dance on film, what he learned from a terrible working experience with Francis Ford Coppola, how he’s ready to start thinking in 3-D, and what comment from Mel Gibson he wishes had gotten stuck in the actor’s throat. The conversation is excerpted over at ShockYa, so click here for the full read.

Chronicle

A low-fi genre hybrid that attempts to cash in on both the burgeoning trend of “found footage” thrillers and superhero origin stories, Chronicle only scratches the surface of its junior-level Magneto narrative. Leaning on an increasingly ineffective patchwork blend of diegetic sources, the movie opts for showy theatrics and set pieces over more honest character investment, and ultimately fritters away a quite promising concept. For the full, original review, from Screen International, click here. (20th Century Fox, PG-13, 84 minutes)

Life, Interrupted

Hampered by a few jury duty curveballs courtesy of the criminal justice system, which are presently gracing me with some 17-hour days. Case in point: set to conduct an interview this morning via cell phone, with recorder jacked into earpiece, while I’m driving to Van Nuys, as that was the only mutually convenient time I was free. We’ll see how that works out. Exhausting, yet it’s also interesting to be thrown together with a random cross-section of folks — a reminder of what’s out there, as Jack London might not say.

After Fall, Winter

Writer-director-actor Eric Schaeffer has made a career out of more or less channeling his offscreen insecurities, foibles and sexual appetites into what could loosely be categorized as slices of desperate-plea entertainment. His filmography behind the camera — which includes If Lucy Fell, Wirey Spindell and 1997’s critically lambasted Fall, to which his latest film is a quasi-sequel — is littered with movies in which he plays articulate, misunderstood, down-on-their-luck guys (often cabbies or writers, sometimes both) who bag chicks consistently out of their league and then get wound up about the impending implosion of said relationships.

Bittersweet, Paris-set romance After Fall, Winter (or just Winter, as it was at one point known) finds Schaeffer again trying to navigate a miasma of commingled narcissism and human frailties, with a pinch of the unlikely and wounded romance on display in Never Again, which was both his most streamlined and mature, well-observed work. Characteristically dawdling and certainly a bit implausible, the film invites a certain low-fi connection for a stretch before fumbling it away with phony details and ham-fisted sexual theatrics. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. For video on demand from its distributor, click here. (FilmBuff, R, 131 minutes)