Monthly Archives: January 2009

Dollars

Written and directed by Richard Brooks, 1971’s Dollars is a weird, freewheeling genre mash-up — part heist flick drama, part screwball character comedy. Parts work, parts don’t, but it’s still an instructive watch, if mainly to suss out how genre filmmaking has changed over the past 35 years.

A Nebraska-born con man working abroad in Hamburg as a security consultant, Joe Collins (Warren Beatty, sporting a Rod Blagojevich-esque helmet of hair) crafts a plan for a bank heist with ditsy hooker Dawn Divine (Goldie Hawn), whose line of work puts her in contact with a shady, money-skimming army sergeant (Scott Brady), a German drug dealer/assassin (Arthur Brauss) and a Vegas mobster (Robert Webber), among others. Operating under the assumption that criminals can’t squeal to the cops if their ill-gotten gains suddenly go missing from a safety deposit box, Joe concocts a scheme by which he and Dawn target only the secret stashes of the aforementioned crooks. After Dawn phones in a fake bomb/theft threat, Joe locks himself in the bank’s vault and deftly avoids the timed, oscillating security camera, emptying a trio of safety deposit boxes into one opened by Dawn, who arrives to empty it the next day, after news coverage of the phony foiled theft. But when these thugs realize they’ve been double-crossed, Dawn and Joe must run for their lives in order to keep the loot.

And when I say run, I mean that seriously. There’s a lot of set-up here… more than an hour’s worth of character stuff (we get to know all the marks, individually), and plenty of faux-scenic dawdling. But when the movie stretches its third act legs, it gets even more bizarre, culminating in an over-the-river-and-through-the-woods finale that finds Joe, hot suitcase in hand, fleeing through snow on foot, in car and in train. This sequence goes on forever, to absurdly comic lengths. Perhaps this is part of some subtextual point, running parallel to the movie’s character-based comedy, but given that overall Dollars treats the heist stuff rather seriously this seems somewhat doubtful.

Brooks, a 1961 Oscar winner for Best Screenplay for Elmer Gantry, crafts a nice character for Beatty, and has a deft touch with dialogue to boot. There’s some tart double entendres about “boxes,” and the film may be — I’m not totally sure — the original source of the infamous, frat-friendly quote, “One thing that doesn’t belong in her mouth is words.” But Dawn Divine is thinly sketched, and Hawn’s portrayal — distractably flitting to and fro — is overly broad and not rooted in any recognizable choice of character or background. Joe and Dawn’s motivations are parceled out in big, manic monologues, and the film feels flimsy when it tries to milk Dawn’s angsty doubt for comedy. (Terrible ADR in a couple scenes sure doesn’t help, either.) Things work a lot better, and feel more natural, when Brooks is trading in small, telling details, like a nervous bank employee slipping a cigarette into his mouth the wrong end first, or Joe concocting an at-moment’s-notice fib to get out of some unanticipated questioning. One thing’s for sure — Hollywood heist movies, like Steven Soderbergh’s Ocean’s series, have gone slick, and grown much more convoluted. But there’s a plenty rich screen history of cracked, cocksure slightly eccentric grifters and white-collar smooth operators, as Dollars proves.

Housed in a regular Amray plastic case, Dollars comes to DVD presented in 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen, with Dolby digital English and French audio tracks, and optional subtitles in both languages as well. The billed supplemental extras here are pretty slight — they amount to the movie’s theatrical trailer and a minute-long “Martini Movies Collection” (the banner under which this title was released) promo clip that ends with a martini recipe. To purchase Dollars via Amazon, click here. B- (Movie) C- (Disc)

Dakota Fanning Gets Drunk, Push-y

Does Dakota Fanning — all dolled up in angst-y, Kool Aid-colored locks — have an agitated drunk scene in the PG-13-rated Push, opening next week? Why yes, yes she does. And while she’s a good actress, it tells you she probably hasn’t yet tied one on in real life, bless her soul.

The Uninvited

A space-filling genre programmer through and through, The Uninvited is one of those movies that plugs along in such avowedly unfussy, obvious fashion as to lull its audience into a shrugging sense of giggly complacency; it spends a lot of time and effort convincing folks that it’s nothing more than an exercise in stylistic manipulation. Then — aha! — comes that One Big Twist, and everything is turned upside down, leaving the audience reeling in appreciation. Right… err, right? Well, not really. No matter how wildly they reframe the narrative, story twists applied lazily just come across as weird and/or yawn-inducing, and unfortunately that’s the case here. The Uninvited isn’t quite clever enough to earn any admiration for its switcheroo finale.

The film opens with Maine teenager Anna (Emily Browning, above left) describing a terrible nightmare to her therapist. In centers around her cancer-stricken mother, who died eight months ago in a fire — an event Anna witnessed, which then led her to try to kill herself. After the therapist gives her some sunny, idiotic advice (“Go home, kiss a boy, get into trouble, finish what you started!”), Anna bounces out of the psychiatric institution where she’s been held with nary a hint of any dark clouds swirling around her, save some scars on her wrists.

Her novelist father Steven (David Strathairn) picks her up, and Anna returns home to her older sister Alex (Arielle Kebbel, above right) and Rachel (Elizabeth Banks), the live-in nurse who’s moved in on the girls’ dad. Anna gets a visit from her mother’s ghost, and when the girls find out about their father’s recent marriage proposal to Rachel, they become convinced that the mysterious interloper did their mother in — a notion Rachel’s penchant for control and breathy, menacing whispers does little to dissuade. Some Nancy Drew-style investigation ensues, and things get spookier when Anna learns of an unsolved homicide case from 10 years earlier involving an in-home caregiver named Mildred Kemp.

Based on a 2003 Korean horror film from director Kim Jee-Woon, and adapted by Craig Rosenberg, Doug Miro and Carlo Bernard, The Uninvited plays for most of its running time, as mentioned, as a very straightforward, on-the-nose, domestic thriller — a downgrade, killer-stepmom lever-puller much in the vein, narratively speaking, of The Glass House or The Hand That Rocks the Cradle. Milking Anna’s instability for slight pokes to the small of the back, there are visions of her Kentucky-fried mom, as well as bleeding keyholes and the like. No stringy, wet-haired Asian girls, though.

As directed by British brothers Charles and Thomas Guard, the movie makes nice use of some effective camera angles when trading in this dream-state spookery that bedevils Anna. But when it comes time for The Uninvited to wow us, and pull the rug out from under an audience, it fails. In the plainest terms, this is evident in the several weak flashbacks that comprise the movie’s post-twist scenes; clever films show you what was there all along, but you failed to consider integral. The Uninvited just lays its revelation on the table, but does nothing to earn it, or make it stick. Indeed, leaving the theater you might be reflecting back on any number of scenes, and thinking how they don’t quite fully make sense in light of the twist.

Browning has pouty, young Angelina Jolie-type lips, and is kind of a cool choice around which to center the movie, in that she isn’t conventionally va-voomish, or made out to look as such. Banks, though, is required to act significantly different depending on what a given scene calls for from her character, and in the end the script still hinges to an awkward degree on adults being required to do dumb things, in order to make Anna and Alex the center of the story, or force certain circumstances upon them. It’s a slight, to-scale success, I guess, in the sense that The Uninvited is able
to somewhat lull inattentive younger audiences into thinking they’re
watching a different kind of movie than what’s actually unfolding. The
narrative execution of its conceit, though, is fairly uninviting. (Paramount/DreamWorks, PG-13, 87 minutes)

Vacancy 2: The First Cut

Despite being directed by a guy with the first name Nimrod, 2007’s Vacancy, a thriller about the dangers of leaving the comfortable asphalt confines of the
interstate
, managed to locate some primal,
gut-level reactions to darkness, jarring noise, faceless killers and
the like. Its straight-to-DVD sequel jumps back to the beginning of the bare-bones mythology laid out in that film, sketching out another stalking tale of very bad acts at a desolate hotel — this time in the form of some peeping Toms who catch a psychotic killer in the act, and then decide to enter into a black-market snuff film pact with him.

At the end of the first film, authorities shut down the remote Pinewood Motel after discovering over 200 videotaped murders on the premises. Vacancy 2: The First Cut charts how the grisly terror began, fleshing out a tale that’s three parts barbarism to one part unlikely opportunism. Suspecting only a night of hard beds and tacky decor, Caleb (Trevor
Wright), his sexy new fiancée Jessica (Agnes Bruckner) and his
sarcastic best friend Tanner (Arjay Smith, very much the token black
guy), the ultimate strange third wheel, check into a rundown rural inn. They have no idea that it’s not
just another lonely motel, but in fact a horrific trap where guests are
brutally tortured and murdered while the sadistic Smith (Scott G. Anderson, reprising his homicidal character from the original movie) and his greedy accomplices, Gordon and Reece (David Moscow and Brian Klugman), film the grisly slayings for profit. Caught in
a deadly game of cat and mouse, the three young friends now must fight
to survive. Can they outwit the deranged killers and escape the roadside trap by morning, or will their fate be forever sealed on video cassette?

Vacancy 2 works in a couple good, or at least good-ish, head feints, including an elongated set-up that introduces a just-wed couple who don’t get axed. Gordon and Reece, you see, are at first just into taping sex acts of randy travelers passing through; it’s Smith who whets their appetite for artery-severing mayhem, after they catch him in the fact of murdering a prostitute. While narratively improbable, I give the movie some credit for piecing things together in a way that interestingly fits with the original film. There’s also some decent performances here, considering the laid track of the script. Still, it remains undeniable that certain character combinations and actions make no sense, be it a honeymooning couple who lay over on a whim or the fact that Tanner is even around in the first place. Also, director Eric Bross (Restaurant, Ten Benny), while slipping in a few moments of downbeat menace, can’t fully resist the impulse to cram in a couple thunderously stupid scene cappers — one early sequence ends with a character menacingly stabbed a dart onto a nearby countertop, and intoning, in chilly fashion, “Let’s get to work.” I mean… really? Do killers, or even those who have yet to kill, say stuff like that?

Housed in a regular Amray plastic case, Vacancy 2: The First Cut is presented in 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen. Owing to its whopping slate of Dolby digital 5.1 audio tracks — six different languages, plus a group commentary track — the DVD is fairly slow to navigate, unfortunately. And that grates. Subtitles in seven languages are also available, so if you speak only Thai but still really like stalking American horror pictures of contained space, then by all means this is right up your alley.

In addition to a collection of deleted scenes, two making-of featurettes are included, including a 13-minute general-interest/behind-the-scenes piece and a stand-alone seven-minute bit that examines the construction of the movie’s exterior inn location. The most engaging supplemental inclusion, however, might be a feature-length group audio commentary track consisting of actors Moscow and Bruckner, director Bross, executive producer Brian Paschal and producer Hal Lieberman. Sharing anecdotes of rampant poison oak outbreaks amongst cast and crew, this lively chat-fest covers a lot of ground. It’s perhaps a bit eyeroll-inducing when Bross starts talking about the “continually shifting balance of power between the antagonists,” the contrast in visual levels, and how certain framing (in the door jamb of a car, for instance) is designed to evoke a “V,” for the movie’s title. Still, there’s some fun, engaging stuff here; it’s not all just empty back-patting. For the movie’s trailer, click here; to purchase the DVD via Amazon, meanwhile, click here. C (Movie) B- (Disc)

Laurent Cantet Talks Culture Clash and The Class

French director Laurent Cantet is interested in the human condition, and the fragility of relationships. His latest movie — the winner of the Palme d’Or at the 2008 Cannes Film Festival, and a Best Foreign Language Film Oscar nominee — aims to capture both the tumult of the adolescent educational experience and, more esoterically, the binding power yet forever extant vagaries and separations of language. Born of a collaboration with novelist/teacher Francois Bégaudeau and a group of teenage non-actors, The Class is a quietly observed drama about one year at a high school in a tough neighborhood (Bégaudeau plays the teacher) in which clashing cultures and attitudes — a microcosm of contemporary urban life — slowly reveal societal fissures. In advance of its wide release, I recently spoke with Cantet about the film’s English language title change, its evocation of multiple social divides, and how France trusts its teenagers more than America. For the full interview chat, from New York Magazine‘s Vulture, click here.

Film Independent Series Adds New Panelists

Film Independent has announced a couple additions to its Directors Close-Up: Conversations on the Art of Filmmaking series. Joining the weekly themed panel chats with independent film fixtures and top-shelf below-the-line talent, all moderated by Mary Sweeney, are: sound designer (and Wall▪E voice maestro) Ben Burtt; Right at Your Door writer-director Chris Gorak; The Secret Life of Bees writer-director Gina Prince-Bythewood; and Notorious screenwriter Reggie Rock Bythewood. For more information on the series, including ticket prices and specific dates, click here.

Variety Lay-Offs Claim Anne Thompson

The industry/publishing world blood-letting continues — deputy editor Anne Thompson was among the estimated 30 lay-offs at Variety yesterday. She says her blog, Thompson on Hollywood, will continue uninterrupted, for now, and that there are other irons in the fire, of course. Sucks. Big-time, as Dick Cheney would say. But who doesn’t have multiple irons in the fire these days? It’s the only wise, proactive move, sadly.

Luke Y. Thompson Assays the New CityBeat

I may have a horse in this race, it’s true, but I’ll just say that over on his blog Luke Y. Thompson really nails the unfolding, ongoing CityBeat situation, in all its mouth-agape curiosity. To briefly set all this on a tee, in the wake of Ella Taylor being let go by L.A. Weekly just a couple weeks ago, CityBeat decided two weeks ago that film editor/critic Andy Klein was a luxury they could no longer afford. I’ll spare some bleak-sounding insider-ish details, because I realize the hard-knock economic reality of things in general, and the publishing world specifically (in Klein and Taylor, probably the two most veteran local critics still
working in the aftermath of Kevin Thomas’ retirement have just been let
go), and I also don’t really know new publisher Will Swaim. But, this bizarre but to my knowledge true bon mot: in the wake of clearing their chief film critic from their books, CityBeat made no effort to even contact any of its film writers.

Film Independent Panel Series Puts Fans, Directors Close-Up

Starting February 4, Film Independent kicks off Directors Close-Up: Conversations on the Art of Filmmaking (formerly the Directors Series) every Wednesday at 7:30 pm at the Landmark Theater in West Los Angeles. Now entering its eighth year, this popular panel series continues until March 11, and will provide film lovers and aspiring filmmakers the chance to hear from some of the best indie directors and their collaborators. This year’s moderator, Mary Sweeney, is a longtime creative collaborator of David Lynch as well as a Film Independent Board Member. Featured panelists for this year include Catherine Hardwicke, former Film Independent Fellows Lance Hammer (Ballast) and Courtney Hunt (Frozen River), Jonathan Levine (The Wackness), Elliot Davis (cinematographer for Twilight, Lords of Dogtown), Rodrigo Garcia (In Treatment, Passengers), Nancy Richardson (editor for Twilight, Lords of Dogtown) and Savage Grace screenwriter Howard Rodman. For more information on the series, including ticket prices and specific dates, click here.

The Deal

A screwball-style, Hollywood-tweaking romantic comedy starring William H. Macy and Meg Ryan, version 2.0, The Deal is a movie that overcomes one of the most terribly obvious PhotoShopped covers of recent memory, as well as a back cover that misspells the name of one of its main characters. In addition to affording screen capture enthusiasts more opportunities to gawk at Macy’s bare ass, the film gives its talented multi-hyphenate a fun chance to play roguish and oblivious. Put it on the front end of a double bill with a Chinese takeout buffet and David Mamet’s State and Main, also starring Macy, and you have yourself a pleasant little evening.

Adapted by Macy and director Steven Schachter from Peter Lefcourt’s book of the same name, The Deal opens with despondent, washed-up Hollywood producer Charlie Berns (Macy) trying to off himself, only to be interrupted by his nephew Lionel (Jason Ritter), an idealistic screenwriter who’s penned a script about former British prime minister Benjamin Disraeli. Seizing on the touted desires of Bobby Mason (LL Cool J, standing in for, oh, Vin Diesel, let’s say), a meatheaded action star and recent convert to Judiasm, to delve into more Jewish-centric material, Berns gets it in his head to take Lionel’s earnest, wholly uncommercial script and turn it into a wildly reimagined, thunderously stupid “freedom fighter” biopic. Wheeling and dealing, planting bogus stories of a bidding war in the trades, Charlie gets a hit-hungry studio desperate to get onboard a Mason picture to snap up the screenplay, and he then shrewdly taps Mason’s manager for rewrite duties. Along the way, Charlie becomes enamored with Deidre Hearn (Ryan), the slightly stuffy, self-serious development executive assigned to fast track the project.

Beginning with the second act, The Deal pivots to South Africa (where it was actually entirely filmed), chronicling the making of Berns and Hearn’s movie, where all sorts of various emergencies flare up, from a temperamental director to a nervous star. With cost-conscious studio execs already circling, Mason gets kidnapped by Muslim extremists. Things look bleak, but an emboldened Deidre finally comes around to Charlie’s damn-the-consequences style, and convinces him to take part in an on-the-fly refashioning of the movie as a legitimate arthouse endeavor.

The Deal‘s dialogue has a nice, ’30s-style patter to it, whether in incidental, passing fancy (“Good job, Hun,” says Charlie, walking past a costumed marauder on the studio lot) or the many scenes in which Charlie tries (and eventually succeeds in) getting into Deidre’s power-suit pants. Not everything works. In fact, the whole kidnapped-movie-star bit was much more effectively played out in last summer’s Tropic Thunder; here it’s just a throwaway gag — albeit a big, plot-shifting one — and then we’re off and running in another direction, never to actually see Mason’s character again. If that sort of abrupt, tacks-underneath-the-tires narrative switcheroo — where you think you’re headed one way, narratively speaking, only to be suddenly thrust in another direction — seems a bit like the storytelling equivalent of sand in the eyes during a playground fight, in the end it doesn’t much matter. Wry and dirty-minded, Macy absolutely steamrolls scenes, and if there’s a big tonal misstep midway through that unnecessarily tries to bring shading to his character — a maudlin sequence where Charlie finds out about the marriage of his adult daughter — most of the movie is content to just let Macy hoodwink folks, like a shrugging, devil-may-care loafer. That’s a plenty good deal, it turns out.

Housed in a regular plastic Amray case with a deep-set, single circular nesting notch, The Deal comes to DVD presented in 1.78:1 widescreen, with Dolby digital 5.1 surround sound and 2.0 stereo audio tracks. Apart from the theatrical trailer for the movie, the only other bonus feature is a 17-minute making-of featurette. It’s chock full of interviews from all the major players, both on screen and off, but Macy holds forth with many of the best ruminations, positing that Hollywood is for the most part a microcosm of society, and also that a writer watching a movie get made from his book is a bit like watching someone make love to one’s wife. “What are they supposed to say,” Macy jokes. “‘Good job?'” There’s also a digital download copy of the film included on the disc, for rip-and-play portability. To purchase the DVD via Amazon, click here. B (Movie) C+ (Disc)

Jeff Dowd Talks More About Sundance Dust-Up

At Sundance, Variety critic John Anderson punched Dirt! producer Jeff Dowd in the face. Via the film’s publicist, Dowd sent out an e-mail discussing the incident. Now there’s more. A lot more. So who am I to deny the Dude a chance to (inimitably) speak his mind? Extended excerpts from Dowd’s long second missive regarding the incident:

“Film criticism is fine, but ill-informed assumptions about how the public will react are not what is best for the planet and not in the spirit of the dialogue that goes on at Sundance. He simply didn’t do a reporter’s homework and listen to audience members before saying, ‘People will not respond to this film.’

What especially bothered me is when I told John how well the audiences were reacting, John said: ‘They are just sheep.’ Had he stayed for the Q&A, John would have seen that these were some pretty smart sheep, who see a lot of films and are perfectly capable of critical thinking and also have a deep enough analysis of what’s going on in the world today and how Dirt! The Movie and what it shows is possible can play an important role in making life on our planet better before it is too late. I guess I am just a sucker for inspired sheep more than critical lemmings who are about to go of the cliff’s edge.

I think this is why John and Laura Kim conducted an extensive interview with me for their fine book I Wake Up Screening. I spoke about the relationship of movies I had worked on, like Academy Award winners Hearts and Minds, Chariots of Fire and Gandhi as well as War Games and many documentaries like those of my friend Neil Young, and how they opened people’s hearts and minds and inspired them and therefore gained tremendous critical, media and grassroots support. I reminded John of this yesterday and said I believe based on the reaction of several hundred ‘sheep’ at four screenings that Dirt! The Movie will be one such film. I know that by the shank of the fest critics are justifiably burnt-out, nonetheless John simply didn’t allow himself to see the reality here.We are at a historic time when information and dialogue are the life-blood of democracy and are essential to the future of the planet. At this time when we are at THE CLIFF’S EDGE (caps his), gratefully informative and hopeful movies like Dirt! The Movie deserve discussion, not the simple dismissal John was unfortunately giving it.”

Now, more about the fisticuffs, specifically:

“After a couple minutes of calm discussion with John as we walked from the Holiday Cinemas to the Yarrow, he decided to cut off the conversation because he had a breakfast meeting (ironically with Diane Weyerman, formerly the head of Sundance Docs and now at Particpant Productions, which is all about progressive films like An Inconvenient Truth and grassroots follow-up. I had also spoken with Jeff Skoll, founder of Particpant, about Dirt!, and he was interested).

So after John left I had a choice: Do I let John write a review which I felt at best was half the story and would be the first review out of Sundance, or do I try to re-engage him? What would you do? What would Gandhi or Martin Luther King or Rosa Parks or Michael Moore do at that moment in time? What was my responsibility to the filmmakers, the sheep who loved the film, my two daughters and the future of the planet? Should the Dude say fuck it and just go bowling or should I not let this intellectual aggression stand and try to re-engage John? I went into the Yarrow dinning room and sat down next to John and Diane and said: “John, I think this is worthy of more discussion.” He responded: “I am trying to have my breakfast and if you don’t leave I am going to punch you out.” He then rose and screamed, “Throw this riff raff out of here.”

I left and ran into the Dirt! filmmakers heading into the Yarrow to have breakfast and conduct an interview. At that moment Jackie “The Jokeman” Martlin of The Howard Stern Show came up to me and said: “Jeff, what a great film Dirt! is. I learned so much and was so inspired.” As we walked into the dinning room I introduced Jackie to John Anderson, who was about eight feet away on the other side of a table for six and said: “John, here is one of those people who liked Dirt!.” John said, “Are you a friend of Jeff’s?” Jackie responded: “I know Jeff, but the point is that this is a very important and inspiring film.” John said: “I am trying to eat my breakfast.” Jackie said: “I understand but this may be more important than you continuing to eat your breakfast for a bit.”

John then turned red and rose up and said: “Jeff, I warned you I was going to punch you out if you tried to talk to me anymore.” I stood there with my hands at my sides. (I am a wrestler and an activist, and we are trained to keep our hands down so as a wrestler we can tackle someone if necessary and as an activist so our hands raised won’t be mis-interpreted as a possible attack position.) John then approached me and threw three jabs to my chest , shoulder and head. None of them even fazed me, which I think surprised John, who works out and has a stance that looks like he has indeed boxed. He turned and started to walk away a few paces and then looked at me and walked back and threw his best solid jab at my mouth, trying to floor me. My head went back a few inches but it didn’t faze me either. I only hope John doesn’t find himself in a real situation where he overestimates his boxing skills and gets hurt.

We left and the manager came up to us and said he had called the police to arrest John. When the police arrived several people came up to the Park City police officer Bob deBotelho and gave him their business cards and said they wanted to testify that John assaulted me. The same was true of many restaurant staff members. In all fairness, Nick Frazier from the BBC and a colleague told the officer that they felt I was harassing John. They of course hadn’t seen the movie, or witnessed John’s anti-intellectual and un-democratic attitude towards me. And as a Jew and an Irishmen I of course understand that there is an unfortunate tradition of British violence and failure to get to the bottom of the story — Tony Blair! I have faith that when Nick sees Dirt! and hears the whole story he will be able to make a distinction between harassment and intellectual engagement at crucial times in history. Maybe he should ask Lord David Puttnam (the producer of Chariots of Fire) about me.

The officer said: “I have more than enough witnesses to arrest the assailant, do you want to press charges?” I declined at that time because I like John, I think he is a good journalist and critic and a person who is a dad and someone who cares about our planet and future. And I don’t think he is a danger to society or would inflict violence on women. He was just having an overwhelming and busy day which had severely lowered his intellectual capacity to room temperature, and was clearly needing food more than ideas and inspiration at that moment. Under other circumstances we might have shared a meal together, had a good conversation and I might have learned from him and he from me.”

Oscar Nominations Announced, Irking Disney and Warner Bros.

After cleaning up with various critics groups and other film-honoring bodies, and going 1-2 at the Los Angeles Film Critics Association awards, commercial juggernauts Wall▪E and The Dark Knight both got relegated to somewhat unfortunately expected, consolation-type booby prizes: a Best Animated Feature nod for the former, and a Best Supporting Actor nomination for Heath Ledger for the latter, among a mess of other, lesser nods. And that sucks, for different reasons. The rejection of Wall▪E shows the stranglehold that the actors’ branch has on voting (the thinking: “no actors = we’re not voting for it for Best Picture, since it didn’t employ as many of us”), while the stiff-arming of The Dark Knight, especially in light of the embrace of past commercial hits, underscores ingrained genre snobbery, pure and simple. Below are the top-shelf domestic narrative nominations:

Best Picture
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Frost/Nixon
Milk
The Reader
Slumdog Millionaire

Best Director
Danny Boyle, Slumdog Millionaire
Stephen Daldry, The Reader
David Fincher, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Ron Howard, Frost/Nixon
Gus Van Sant, Milk

Best Actor
Richard Jenkins, The Visitor
Frank Langella, Frost/Nixon
Sean Penn, Milk
Brad Pitt, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Mickey Rourke, The Wrestler

Best Actress
Anne Hathaway, Rachel Getting Married
Angelina Jolie, Changeling
Melissa Leo, Frozen River
Meryl Streep, Doubt
Kate Winslet, The Reader

Best Supporting Actor
Josh Brolin, Milk
Robert Downey Jr., Tropic Thunder
Philip Seymour Hoffman, Doubt
Heath Ledger, The Dark Knight
Michael Shannon, Revolutionary Road

Best Supporting Actress
Amy Adams, Doubt
Penelope Cruz, Vicky Cristina Barcelona
Viola Davis, Doubt
Taraji P Henson, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Marisa Tomei, The Wrestler

Best Original Screenplay
Frozen River
In Bruges
Happy-Go-Lucky
Milk
Wall▪E

Best Adapted Screenplay
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Doubt
Frost/Nixon
The Reader
Slumdog Millionaire

Best Animated Feature
Bolt
Kung Fu Panda
Wall▪E

More thoughts later, and in the coming weeks, certainly, but the Best Supporting Actress nominations clearly offer mostly confirmatory love on the part of AMPAS voters — Cruz and Adams are recent nominees, and Tomei a past Oscar winner. Taraji P Henson’s nomination for a solid but unexceptional performance in a very Mammy-ish role in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button is depressing, but indicative of the weird love that film is getting.

The Alphabet Killer

Written by Tom Malloy (who also co-stars in the film), The Alphabet Killer is a decently gripping psychological thriller loosely based on the still-unsolved “double initial” murders that shocked the citizens of Rochester, New York in the early 1970s. The details of the true story? From 1970 to 1973, three girls in and around Rochester were brutally raped and strangled, their bodies dumped in neighboring villages that bore the same first initial as their names. All three victims’ — young girls, aged 10 to 12 — first and last names also had matching initials. Despite the questioning of more than 800 suspects and the combined police resources of several communities, the case remains unsolved to this day.



In the film, Eliza Dushku stars Megan Paige, a police investigator whose commitment to the job borders on obsession. Megan and her partner, Lt. Ken Shine (Cary Elwes), are assigned to investigate the murder of a young girl named Carla Castillo, whose body is found in the nearby town of Churchville. Despite Megan’s considerable efforts, her inability to catch the killer leads to a nervous breakdown, eventually causing her to lose her fiancée, her career in law enforcement career, and her grip on reality.

Two years later, Megan is back at the police department, albeit in a demoted position. With the help of a mental illness support group headed by Richard Ledge (Timothy Hutton), Megan is slowly getting her life back on track. But when two more young girls are murdered with the same “alphabet” modus operandi, Megan becomes convinced the same serial killer has resurfaced. Battling hallucinations of the dead girls — as well as distrust from her colleagues — Megan dives back into the case, determined to bring the culprit to justice. With few leads and fewer concrete suspects, can she catch the “Alphabet Killer” before another victim is found?

There are hints of Flesh and Bone to this thriller, believe it or not, as well as some unreliable narrator/Insomnia-type shiftiness that Malloy craftily works in. (In this regard, the movie earns its stripes as part of a perfectly nutty Dushku double-dip, alongside the recent Nobel Son.) Director Rob Schmidt, who previously worked with Dushku on the thriller Wrong Turn, shoots the affair in a fairly straightforward fashion, but also has a nice sense of when to slow-play things to string along the tension. Dushku, who’s set to return to the small screen next month in the upcoming Fox series Dollhouse, does a fairly decent job overall, but also leans on a few mannered, TV acting tics that help keep her performance from being more of a naturalistic, rooted thing. If there’s a codifying strength here, other than the creepy fact that this is a speculative thriller, rooted in fact, it’s the movie’s superb supporting cast — the aforementioned bit players, plus Tom Noonan, recent Oscar nominee Melissa Leo, Larry Hankin, Bill Moseley, Jack McGee and Michael Ironside. They help give the film a sense of depth, and genuineness, that eludes a lot of straight-to-video crime dramas.

Housed in a regular plastic Amray case in turn stored in a cardboard slipcover with matching art, The Alphabet Killer is presented in 2.35:1 anamorphic widescreen, with a Dolby digital 5.1 audio track. Two audio commentaries highlight the DVD’s special features. The first is with producer Isen Robbins and director Schmidt (Crime + Punishment in Suburbia, the “Masters of Horror” series hour-long flick Right to Die), the latter of whom talks some about his cameo in the film as a cop who discovers a body in a rock quarry. Also, somewhat uncomfortably and hilariously, Schmidt picks the exact moment of Dushku’s brief topless scene to say “It felt like the right time for her to play a woman.” The audio commentary track with writer-producer-actor Malloy is thankfully much more interesting and engaging. In breathless fashion, Malloy drops mad anecdotes and mundane details alike (Elwes wearing his BlueTooth in a scene), as well as pointing out his mother’s filing secretary cameo. In more substantive monologues, he expounds upon the themes of “man versus self” (or woman, really) in the movie; he also drops an amusing sideways crack on Ralph Fiennes when he touts co-star Noonan’s work in Manhunter.

Finally, wrapping up the slate of bonus material is a three-minute, time-coded, alternate version of the movie’s opening scene — an investigatory traipse through the woods by Dushku and Elwes — and a completely pointless six-minute featurette that strings together a bunch of behind-the-scenes footage under music. Some of the latter material looks interesting on the surface, but without some context or linking interviews, however, this tells us nothing of substance about the movie. To purchase the DVD via Amazon, click here. B- (Movie) C+ (Disc)

Nation Heartily Embraces Paul Blart; More Mall Cop Flicks Await

Struggling with a friend and colleague earlier this week to understand the astonishing $34 million opening weekend gross of Paul Blart: Mall Cop — a near-$10,000 per screen average, and a number that I hear surprised even Sony’s in-house number-crunchers, by a significant margin — this was the best I could come up with:

“My only theory (which is admittedly not a very good one) is that in the same way that Christmas releases will boost the returns of certain films — since families are together and looking for something to do that doesn’t involve more talking about Uncle John’s new boyfriend or Aunt Sally’s recent DUI — maybe folks gearing up for the Inauguration celebration wanted a collective mental health break, a way to definitively check out of the real world for a bit, and laugh at the fat guy who couldn’t slide all the way across the floor. I’d be fascinated in the complete regional box office receipt breakdowns on the movie, and urban vs. rural, etcetera. Of course, I think this cracked theory could only account for a couple million dollars, so I don’t know — maybe Kevin James is morphing into the new Tim Allen, i.e., the TV star turned “safe” movie lead, in kind of bland, middle-of-the-road, family-friendly fare. Didn’t see that coming…”

SAG Awards Media Advisory Touts Grocery List

Just in case anyone was wondering, I’ve been sent a SAG Awards media advisory which informs me that “Jackson’s Catering purveyor order for the event” includes the following: 225 pounds of crab, five pounds of fresh dill, 20 gallons of vegetable stock, 400 Seckle pears, 20 pounds each of dried apricots, figs and black olives, three gallons of sweet corn, 40 gallons of pomegranate juice and six gallons of olive oil. Granted, I just pulled those items from a much longer list and left out all the alcohol (which includes Champagne Taittinger Brut La Française… ooh la la) to make it seem really weird. But it’s the people with this sort of inventory that I always seem to get stuck behind at the grocery store. The 15th annual awards ceremony
for the Screen Actors Guild jumps off on Sunday, January 25, at the Shrine Exposition Center, and will be simulcast live on TBS and TNT.

Jeff Dowd Talks About Fight with Variety’s John Anderson

So the big news swirling around Sundance today was of course that Jeff Dowd, a producer on the film Dirt! and the basis of Jeff Bridges’ character in The Big Lebowski, got punched in the face by Variety critic John Anderson after a disagreement and extended argument/conversation/monologue about the documentary. (Anne Thompson rounds up the situation nicely here, including interviews with the principals.) Not there, so I’ll spare my thoughts. But Dowd’s remarks on the incident, passed along by Dirt! publicist Mickey Cottrell, are as follows:

“My disagreement with John was not over his critical reaction, which he has every right to, but his statement that the film wouldn’t appeal to the public. I suggested he come back into the theater for the Q&A, and he would observe what we had seen at all for [sic] screenings — that audiences felt the film had all kinds of new information and practical solutions. It wasn’t homework, but hope made pragmatic on how we can change the planet in keeping with Obama’s Inauguration speech. I told John one of scores of examples of this was when John Densmore of The Doors stood up at our first screening (after a sustained audience applause at the end) and said, ‘I have my own film here — which I clearly care about — but here is my ballot which I marked 4 stars because Dirt! is the film that should win the Sundance Festival.’ That was emblematic of all the great feedback. I just asked John Anderson to put that in the mix before making assumptions that audiences would respond negatively. It should also be said that a vast majority of audience members liked the film not just because they ‘support the cause.’ We have heard dozens of comments about the quality of the filmmaking as well. In the spirit of John Waters, we even had smell-o-vision at one screening where you could smell the sweet earthy scent of dirt and mother Earth.”

First Images Surface from Where the Wild Things Are

There have been all sorts of Internet rumors about Where the Wild Things Are ever since its test screening last year allegedly reduced a handful of adolescents to pants-wetting crybabies. But The Playlist now has confirmed images of the movie’s beasties, straight from director Spike Jonze’s skateboard company. And yes, Jonze really has Wild Things sneakers. I guess he figured if Obama can have his own kicks, then surely he can make some too. Alas, I failed to ask Jonze about this at the recent LAFCA dinner, where he was present.

Henry Poole Is Here

His life in shambles, despondent Henry Poole (Luke Wilson)
buys an abode in the same suburban, tract-house Los Angeles neighborhood where he
somewhat unhappily grew up, amidst the constant din of his parents’ arguments. Quietly withdrawn, Henry just wants to stew in his own juices, and be left alone, but one of his new neighbors, the slightly nosy
but well-meaning Esperanza (Babel‘s Adriana Barraza), happens upon a stain on his newly painted, outdoor stucco wall that she believes is the face of Christ, and thus imbued with special powers. Henry regards this as a bunch of silliness, but more interactions with those around him — including divorcée Dawn (Radha Mitchell), whose eight-year-old daughter, Millie (Morgan Lily) has stopped speaking ever since her parents’ break-up — slowly draw him out of his insular shell.

Henry Poole Is Here is directed by Mark Pellington, a filmmaker with a deep music video catalogue (including Pearl Jam’s groundbreaking “Jeremy” clip) who’s always been a master of atmosphere and mood, most notably with The Mothman Prophecies. Here, though, he rolls the dice on a much more personal story, and succeeds in crafting what is overall a fairly affecting movie about emotional waywardness and the heavy psychological lifting of substantive interpersonal reflection. The target is smaller, but Pellington’s extraordinary skill at marrying artful image and emotional content help Henry Poole
avoid a lot of treacly downward drag, and elevate the emotional punch
of debut screenwriter Albert Torres’ script, which is enough of a blank
canvas to allow one to project onto it their own feelings of
forlornness. The only nagging demerit? There’s a plummy, surface quality to Wilson’s moroseness and sullenness; watching the movie, one thinks about the deeper reservoirs of swallowed sadness that someone like Ryan Gosling could have conveyed with this role, and how those extra pangs of despair would have provided an even greater catharsis.

Housed in a regular plastic Amray case in turn stored in a flat-faced (i.e., no raised text) cardboard slipcover, Henry Poole Is Here allows viewers the option of a full-frame or 2.40:1 anamorphic widescreen presentation, the latter of which obviously preserves the aspect ratio of its original theatrical exhibition. A Dolby digital 5.1 surround sound track anchors the audio options, and optional Spanish and English SDH subtitles are also included. A feature-length audio commentary track with Pellington and Torres underscores the deeply felt personal pull of the material for each man; they talk about the slight changes and tweaks from inception to actualization, and their feelings both about the collaboration in general and the themes the movie explores. Pellington is an especially intelligent and persuasive advocate for the work — smart and passionate, but not given to pointy-headed intellectual diatribes. He opens up a bit about his heartrending offscreen loss (his wife died suddenly, leaving him a widower and the single father of a three-year-old girl), and how therapeutic the movie was for him.

Further personal testimonials come in a solidly produced, 16-minute making-of featurette, which includes interviews with all of the primary cast and crew. Other special features include theatrical trailers for Henry Poole and three other Anchor Bay DVD releases, as well as two short music videos — one for James Grundler’s “All Roads Lead Home,” and another, directed by Pellington, for MySpace.com theme song contest winner Ron Irizarry. To purchase the DVD via Amazon, click here. B- (Movie) B (Disc)

The Other Awards Derby: Some Thoughts on Editing

For the second year in a row, Michael Kunkes and Editors Guild Magazine polled recent Oscar-winning and -nominated guild members, along with a sampling of film critics, to gauge the prevailing award-winds in the three catagories of guild achievement recognized by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences: Best Achievement in Film Editing, Sound Editing and Sound Mixing. My free-form thoughts:

“The Academy Awards for Sound and Sound Editing are seemingly frequently linked to brawny and/or fantastic movies — adventures that unfold in clamorous fashion, or at least require a handful of discrete tracks — while Film Editing Oscars are inextricably linked to Best Picture nominees. And there’s usually laudable work found therein; after all, the editing is a big part of the success of those films, commercially and critically. So while I think The Dark Knight can be justly lauded for its evocation of urban terror and lingering menace, other films, like Gus Van Sant’s Milk and Zhang Ke Jia’s gorgeously pieced together Still Life, also located telling visual rhythms and quieter aural palettes that no less summoned specific time and place.

To me, Slumdog Millionaire was mad and invigorating, on all levels of editing and mixing, down to the creative use of subtitles. A bit off the beaten path, though, Jonathan Demme’s Rachel Getting Married made a big impression on me. With its source music and at once casual and unnervingly intimate style, the movie conjures up — in refreshing ways — the tension and jocularity, joy and anxiety of large-scale familial gatherings. Similarly affecting was the sound and picture editing in Charlie Kaufman‘s Synecdoche, New York, which was integral in the creation of a world in which Philip Seymour Hoffman’s character manufactures an entire cityscape in an abandoned hangar, even as he ages and finds himself plagued by an undisclosed health crisis. Both of these films were, if you’ll excuse the invention of a word, grand tapestral efforts, which is to say thoughtful, carefully plotted affairs serving perhaps more esoteric masters.”
For the full, fully worthwhile read, including the thoughts of the estimable Myron Meisel and Wade Major, click here.