Monthly Archives: April 2009

Filmmaker Paolo Sorrentino Talks Il Divo, Italian Politics

Just as Matteo Garrone‘s lauded Gomorrah provided an aerial snapshot of Italian power, crime and political corruption, so too does Paolo Sorrentino’s Il Divo , the winner of the Jury Prize at the 2008 Cannes Film Festival. The difference is a matter of focus. Whereas Garrone’s sprawling mob drama ensemble took a somewhat impressionistic approach, Il Divo stars Toni Servillo (also a bit player in Gomorrah, incidentally) as seven-time Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti, a man whose almost otherworldly ability to hold onto power despite all sorts of nasty rumors and criminal charges (including a murder rap) made him one of the most fascinating political figures, Italian or otherwise, of the last half century.

Il Divo has already rung up around $11 million abroad, including an impressive $8.5 million in its native Italy, and if its Stateside commercial prospects, where it opens in limited release this week via Music Box Films, seem relatively low-burning, the movie is at least interesting for the manner in which it seemingly indicates a burgeoning desire on the part of foreign filmmakers to further explore the defining, controversial sociopolitical players of their day and age.

“Andreotti is very
mysterious man, which is why I wanted to make the film,” says Sorrentino, who was not yet 10 years old when the politician was elected to the first of his seven terms as Prime Minister. “He’s always
been very popular, because in addition to being a politician, he’s also
been a very popular writer, and he’s been on television a lot. Also, I’m very drawn to characters that are alone or affected by solitude, and even though Andreotti is constantly surrounded by other people, there’s a very deep sense of solitude in his character, which leads to this interesting sense of melancholy.”

Melancholic, yes, but also devisive, and somewhat unknowable. In fact, the story goes, ask any 10 people about Andreotti, and you’re llikely to have a neatly split opinion on the man, complete with all sorts of fractured, at-odds anecdotes. To capture that sense of swirling mystery — some paint Andreotti as the ultimate quiet, back-room broker, a sort of forerunner to Dick Cheney, others view him as a corruptible pawn in larger power games — Sorrentino (above, setting a low-angle shot) settled upon a lively style seemingly out of step with the staid subject matter of political ascension and shell games.

“Of course we [knew it was] going to be a devisive
film, because Andreotti is a figure that is either loved or hated,” says Sorrentino with the aide of a translator. “Andreotti is a man that’s full of irony; this is something that
comes forward often in many of his jokes. But it had to be expressed in
a way that went beyond just the spoken word, and that’s what led to the
decisions with certain song selections, and the way the film was
framed. I choose the music as I write the script, because I need the
music in order to be able to write the script.”

Then there was the director’s choice for Andreotti — longtime friend and collaborator Servino, a multi-hyphenate threat in his own right who perfectly captures Andreotti’s hounddog dourness and slouch, the one part of the public record with respect to Andreotti that brings no argument or dissension. “I
told Servino to become a machine, or a robot, which was a very quick
way of giving him direction for the part,” recalls Sorrentino. “He’s one of the most
extraordinary actors of his generation, so it
was absolutely unthinkable that he wouldn’t play the part.”

Given the rebuke of overt religious political grandstanding that American voters delivered unto the Republican party in the last two election cycles, an interesting undercurrent of Il Divo is found in the masonic secrecy of Andreotti’s supporters in the Italian Christian Democrat party, and the manner in which they pull levers of power. How does this intersect with Andreotti’s own faith? Is his worldview shaped by it, or is it a cynical alliance of convenience? Even Sorrentino, after all sorts of meticulous research, isn’t sure. “The question of the sincerity of his faith is something that no one will ever know, it’s a completely private issue,” he says. “However, the way he carries and conducts himself is in fact very much tied to the culture of the church, which is a much different thing than the issue of faith. This is a very complicated issue, and one that’s changed a lot recently. Now, the great majority of the population doesn’t really feel that there’s an honest and sincere role of the church in the execution of politics.”

For more on Il Divo, click here.

Why Matthew McConaughey Is Like Baby Powder

So I had a realization about Matthew McConaughey recently, and it didn’t come from staring at a picture of the sun glistening off his shirtless body. No, instead, it struck me as I was wandering through Target, and came across some Johnson’s Baby Powder, which actually has the enigmatic phrase “Clinically proven mildness” stamped across the front of its packaging: McConaughey is the Johnson’s Baby Powder of the under-40 set, masculine enough for the ladies, but so totally bro-riffic as to induce absolutely no feelings of hostility or jealousy in any guy. This isn’t to say that he’s at all feminine, just that there’s no edge, darkness or menace to him, no capacity for ill will, violence or even complication lurking behind those eyes. Paul Walker has undeniably more of an edge to him than McConaughey; hell, I think DJ Qualls might, too.

In and of itself this wouldn’t necessarily be a problem, but for the way it’s coloring McConaughey’s work, and choices. I mean, just look at the sigh-inducing poster for Ghosts of Girlfriends Past, his new pairing with Jennifer Garner (Kate Hudson was apparently unavailable), and try to convince me that there exists a more de-fanged-looking actor working consistently in studio fare these days. Even the rare, occasional curveball (We Are Marshall, Two for the Money) can’t escape the drag of McConaughey’s Southwestern stoner-folksy persona, which descends like a thick mist upon almost all in which he appears. Notice I said almost. A late sub for Owen Wilson, McConaughey slayed in Tropic Thunder, reminding viewers how fun he can be when unhooked from rom-com piffle. Unfortunately, apart from that emergency role-snatch, McConaughey seems unconcerned with any sort of on-screen exercise to match his off-screen workout regimen, and so his movies have become near caricatures of themselves.

Funny People Says It’s Just Kidding About Death

So I’ve watched the long-play trailer for Funny People, Judd Apatow’s new film, twice now, and while I understand that the segue into James Brooks territory is somewhat natural and expected for a young-ish father (kids often spark grappling with mortality, ironically), and doesn’t at all indicate a precipitous drop-off in relative quality (or attendant commercial success), I can’t help but feel like it gives away a bit too much of the movie’s twists and turns. Less fanciful, more grounded real-world comedies, those not powered by conceit, needn’t necessarily sell the stick that stirs the pot; movies like that are all about showcasing the tone, some good jokes, and a likeable/relatable cast… things Funny People has in abundance. Sure, it’s not quite a Ransom-esque reveal — a la that trailer’s casual foregrounding of the movie’s publicly announced bounty on the kidnapper of Mel Gibson’s son — but playing the death card and then pulling it back off the table in under 60 seconds seems a bit flippant, especially juxtaposed with Leslie Mann’s hilariously woeful Down Under accent. If I’m overthinking the film I’ve now already guessed part of its ending.

Breaking News Alert: Fox (Gasp!) Lies About Wolverine Print

With regards to the latest news over the leaked online version of Wolverine, Patrick Goldstein, in his Big Picture blog, seems to take a curiously emotionally distant, wrongheaded and naive stance in his reportage on the matter, saying “until now (emphasis mine) 20th Century Fox has never adequately explained how co-chairman Tom Rothman could say 10 minutes of
footage were missing when the [107-minute] running times for the pirated version and
the theatrical version were the same.”

The only apparent reason for his qualifier from Goldstein? This explanation from Fox’s senior vice president of corporate communications, Chris
Petrikin: “There was no ‘fibbing’ involved — that would imply that we were so
on top of things that we anticipated having one of our biggest films of
the year stolen and had time to concoct a plan to purposefully ‘spin’
wrong information. Remember, Tom gave this
[Entertainment Weekly] interview a day after we learned of the theft. A
lot of information and misinformation was flying back and forth then,
and there was no way to sort it out quickly or definitively
. In fact, I
think I told Tom that there might be 10  minutes missing from the
stolen version, based — obviously — on misinformation I was given or
misinterpreted. The real issue is the scale of this crime, and that the
film was not finished when it was stolen.”

Jesus Christ, this reminds one of Scooter Libby, Karl Rove and the whole Valerie Plame situation. Of course Fox would/did/will lie about compromised product in an effort to protect their investment, and goad fanboy audiences into shelling out money for something they’ve already downloaded illegally online. Is anyone remotely connected to the film industry really shocked by that? Or any thinking person in general? The motive is clear, and understandable. But to accept as somehow satisfactory the explanation for a massive factual error — from a vice president of corporate communications — that simply “a lot of information was flying back and forth” is simply retarded. Huge, multi-national corporations do not make uncalculated moves, or shoot from the hip, or send co-chairmen out to talk in crisis situations with scant outlines of a situation. The original lie needed a face/name to give it heft, hence Rothman’s aggressiveness; the walking back of the lie will begin (and possibly end?) at lower levels, so Petrikin, dutifully playing the Scott McClellan role, gets to get an early start on his career in creative fiction. Whatever, I get it. I’m just more irritated, actually, with the notion that anyone would accept this argument on face value. It’s ridiculous.

Steven Seagal’s Kill Switch Makes TV Debut

For those wanting to add some throat punches to the conclusion of their weekend, Steven Seagal’s entertainingly terrible Kill Switch makes its television debut on Spike TV on Sunday, May 3 at 10 p.m., EDT. Check your local listings to at least TiVo the opening 15 minutes, which feature a hilariously over-edited sequence in which Seagal catches a serial killer, and then “tosses” him around, through break-away walls and mock-glass tables.

Oliver Stone Inks for Wall Street Sequel

After a couple weeks of swirling rumors, Variety is reporting that Oliver Stone is set to return to the Wall Street sequel that may or may not still be called Money Never Sleeps. There were early attempts to pooh-pooh the certainty of Stone’s re-upping, but this is a no-brainer, of course, since Stone yearns for big-league relevance, as both World Trade Center and the play-nice, concessionary inclinations of his Dubya biopic indicate. Not doing this movie would go against the grain of what’s in his blood, especially given the current economic climate. So Stone is in, Michael Douglas is back, and Edward Pressman is again on board as producer. Naturally, perhaps because Chris Pine is somehow deemed too old (or maybe because the ridiculous wig he’s forced to sport in Bottle Shock is still secretly being held against him by Hollywood), none other than Shia LaBeouf is in talks to join Douglas, who talked on a comically large cell phone and won an Oscar as Gordon Gekko in the original 1987 film.

America Betrayed

A minor chord social rage riff, Leslie Cardé’s America Betrayed takes a crack at exposing the dirty little secrets behind our nation’s crumbling infrastructure, in particular the complicity between the Army Corps of Engineers — designers of the levees that failed during Hurricane Katrina — and the United States Congress, which funds the group, nominally tasks it in a manner that includes plenty of inessential or less important public works projects, and then provides little to no oversight, allowing some jobs to run over schedule by decades.

As a sociopolitical documentary, the film slots in decently alongside recent similar cage-rattling product like I.O.U.S.A. and The Ascent of Money — movies that cast long, deep shadows of doubt over governmental competence and fiscal responsibility, and the ability of even honest politicians, public servants and activists to affect change both quick and substantive. And with our bridges, dams, levees and highways collectively crumbling, toppling, being washed away and putting American citizens and cities at risk, the issue of infrastructure reinforcement and reinvestment is an undeniably important one. But America Betrayed isn’t the film to galvanize public opinion, or even clearly impart a message of how things stand.

Narrated by Richard Dreyfuss, America Betrayed bills itself as “a cautionary tale for Americans everywhere,” but it’s far too messy to connect on any sort of lasting emotional level. Featuring scores of interviews with Pulitzer Prize-winning journalists,
noted scientists, politicians from both sides of the aisle (including
free-use clips from Barack Obama, John McCain and Hillary Clinton), and whistleblowers who risked their lives and careers to
speak out, the movie is literally aflood with information. (Yeah: pun.) It’s just that it’s poorly organized, structured and delineated.

America Betrayed begins with an exploration of the little-known causes behind the Katrina levee
failures, ostensibly using this as a springboard to expose the
rampant collusion, corruption and cronyism within the government
agencies whose very purpose it is to protect us. Between failing to provide proper historical framing for 1965’s Hurricane Betsy and not clearly establishing the expert credentials of many of her subjects, however, Cardé repeatedly shows herself to have no objective sense of aerial docu-storytelling. (At one point, she’s even heard out-of-frame, peppering an interviewee with the penetrating query, “Yeah, what was that about?”) What we have here are loose ends and passionate rants, taped and tied together in whimsical fashion. It’s more than an hour into things before the real underlying point of the film — a call for a fundamental reforming of the manner in which the United States funds water projects — is even directly addressed.

There’s no doubt that the rebuilding of New Orleans, and an overhaul of the Corps of Engineers, remains frustratingly low on the country’s to-do list, even 100 days into the new Obama administration. But Cardé doesn’t have the chops to sustain viewer outrage over this monumental moral failing, and then tie it into the grander issues at play. As a skipped-stone, scatterbrained portrait of how the top leadership of the
Army Corps of Engineers is more concerned with self-serving transitions
into corporate America, how we’ve wasted taxpayer dollars building
other nations’ infrastructures instead of our own, how
lobbyists and politicians funnel money to pet projects, and how
those sent to investigate financial misappropriation are bribed into
silence or simply don’t do their jobs, this documentary more or less works, in air-quote fashion. But any frothy rage or eagerness to make a change dissipates on contact, as soon as the credits roll. And that’s a shame, honestly, because truth be told, we should be pissed off.

Housed in a regular plastic Amaray case, America Betrayed is presented in an enhanced 16×9 aspect ratio, and includes a nine-minute interview with Cardé, seven-and-a-half minutes of bonus
interviews
, a filmmaker biography, film resource guide and trailers for three other First Run titles, including the superb Constantine’s Sword. To purchase the DVD, click here. C- (Movie) B- (Disc)

Plus Zero Is the New Plus One…

“Plus zero” is the new “plus one,” apparently. Oh, not in any original invite, of course. Just if you mention a guest in an email confirmation of attendance. Which makes you wonder what the fuck folks would do if you just showed up as a pair, and staged a good scene.

Fighting

The emotional template of Midnight Cowboy provides the unlikely inspiration for the slightly smarter-than-average knuckle-duster Fighting, in which two different-minded New York City outcasts team up in mutual-use fashion to pull themselves up and out of their marginal existences. Committed performances and smart, unobtrusive direction help mitigate a story with some notable lapses in logic, and elevate it in relation to like-minded fare.



Alabama native Shawn MacArthur (Channing Tatum, above) has come to New York City with nothing. Selling phony Harry Potter books and other counterfeit goods on the street, he’s barely earning a living. Shawn’s luck changes when, in a scrum protecting his merchandise, scam artist and smooth-talking hustler Harvey Boarden (Terrence Howard) sees he has a natural talent for fighting. Harvey offers Shawn a chance at making bigger money in back-room, bare-knuckle brawls where the rich and curious gather to watch and bet on brawny strangers. The duo form an unfussy partnership, with Shawn crashing on Harvey’s couch. As Shawn experiences some success, he finds himself drawn to single mother Zulay Velez (Zulay Henao). He also crosses paths with an old college nemesis turned professional mixed martial arts fighter, Evan Haley (Brian White), setting the scene for a climactic rooftop clash with a $100,000 payday.

Fighting‘s third act unravels a bit; the reasons provided for the animosity between Shawn and Evan aren’t particularly plausible, or compelling. Still, director Dito Montiel (A Guide to Recognizing Your Saints) works in a fairly restrained fashion outside of the cramped fight sequences, and the film’s dialogue is alternately good-naturedly carping and a bit roughhewn, with overlapping or halting exchanges nicely shading characters’ personalities. In all, there’s a lot of honest effort and investment here in character and emotion, which at least feels refreshing.

Interesting musical selections also help give the film purpose, and punch. In addition to very effective use of Marvin Gaye’s “Trouble Man,” horn-inflected original compositions give Fighting an early sense of uplift. Various ethnically flavored fight sequences, meanwhile, incorporate bits of traditional instrumentation accordant with their respective settings or antagonists. For the full original review, from Screen International, click here. (Rogue, PG-13, 105 minutes)

Sean Penn Gives Acting Advice to Dick Cheney, Newt Gingrich

In a blog posting over on the Huffington Post, Sean Penn — no blind, knee-jerk supporter of Barack Obama — takes the piss out of those that would criticize Obama’s recent handshake with Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, saying, “This is a pattern of bad acting advice from bad actors. All wimps think playing a tough guy is done in one-note coldness. With a friend or an enemy, our president will gain greater strategic position with a smile.”

Fight Night

With James Toback’s Mike Tyson documentary hitting screens and Fighting in theaters this weekend, it seems something pugilistic is in the air, so it’s as good a time as any to assay Fight Night, a new straight-to-video release that’s part con man roadshow, part femme-centric, bloodied-lip Never Back Down-type programmer, and part unlikely bonding tale. All in all, though quite obviously cramped by limited production means, this movie connects as at least a solid indie jab, courtesy of some effectively engaging performances, smarter-than-average plotting and fun dialogue.

A lonely drifter on the run from a past best forgotten, con man Michael Dublin (Chad Ortis, smoking theatrically) works the underground fight club circuit, moving from one scam to another and leaving a trail of enemies in his wake. When he gets his ass saved one night by down-and-out Katherine Parker (Rebecca Neuenswander, above, a total ringer for The Biggest Loser‘s Jillian Michaels), a female fighter with the skills to take down a man twice her size, Dublin seizes upon his best scam scheme yet. Rigging fights in reverse, the two — uneasy partners through and through — hit the road, working fights in seedy basement bars, backwoods county fairs and rundown warehouses. Eventually, though, Dublin’s shady past catches up with them, raising the stakes higher than they’d imagined possible.

Fight Night is billed as an action flick, and understandably so — there’s a reason its title was changed from Rigged, its original moniker — but that’s not where most of its appeal lies. In truth, the fisticuffs are frequently muddled to the point of being ridiculous, boring, or both, with odd angles and botched edits betraying the logic of the action. In scenes of inaction, though, the film is actually quite nicely photographed, and powered by a snarky, Moonlighting-style rapport between its leads. On the surface, Ortis’ Dublin is too smirky by about a third, but one eventually warms to it, especially since Parker frequently gets to call him out on his behavior, generally denigrating him and cracking on “that cock-holster you call a mouth.”

If that brings a wince, yes, it’s true, Ian Shorr’s script loads up on finger-snapping dialogue (“Hey, I don’t care who you rock the casbah with, kitty cat,” says Dublin to Parker, “but we’re business partners now…”) that could — and, well, kind of does — undercut some of the heavier dramatic stuff that comes into play as the movie wears on. But Neuenswander and Ortis have a nice chemistry, and director-editor Jonathan Dillon stages the more character-centric scenes in a way that makes you lean forward a bit. The end result isn’t high art, perhaps, but it outclasses the baser solicitations of its cover box art, shows all-for-one spirit and effort on the part of its makers, and is certainly better than it has a right to be, given the budget and other means.

Presented in a 16×9 widescreen aspect ratio, along with English language Dolby digital 5.1 surround sound and 2.0 stereo audio tracks, Fight Night comes housed in a regular plastic Amaray case. English and Spanish subtitles are also included. Despite the touted press release inclusion of a production featurette, digital copy of the movie and an accompanying photo gallery, there aren’t such inclusions on the DVD. Special features instead include five-plus minutes of deleted scenes, the movie’s trailer and an audio commentary track with Dillon, cinematographer Hanuman Brown-Eagle and… gaffer/gopher Jason Cantu!

This sounds weird, I realize, but that combination works, even if Dillon misidentifies his movie right out of the gate, calling it Fight Nights, plural. Not having the two leads, and in particular Neuenswander, robs the track of any sort of serious discussion or insight about the characters, or acting on display, but this trio have a lot of anecdotes to share about the film’s November-December 2005 Kansas shoot, and the fratty but not overly self-aggrandizing warmth of their reminiscences makes even a few barbed oblique asides (“If you can afford it, get an art department that brings you some options,” Dillon says at one point) sound not really that assholish, especially since they suffered arrests and other run-ins with the police due to filming without permits. Other tidbits gleaned? An important location house was once owned by Howard Hughes, and the car used in the film was a graduation gift from Dillon’s grandfather, with its trunk doubling as the production’s wardrobe storage. To purchase the DVD via Amazon, click here. B- (Movie) B- (Disc)

McG Chats Terminator Salvation; Dollhouse Panel Recapped

Over at Box Office, Amy Nicholson lets Terminator Salvation‘s McG defend his life and work, asks him about potential robot domination, and refreshingly doesn’t ask about Christian Bale’s epic screamdown of cinematographer Shane Hurlbut. It is amusing, though, when McG name-checks Children of Men, and says, “I don’t like cutting as a false sense of action. I think that that is a bluff, and I don’t like rewarding filmmakers who choose to go down that road.”

Meanwhile, over at The 213, Telly Davidson entertainingly recaps the recent Dollhouse panel in Los Angeles, part of the Paley Center for Media’s 26th annual festival salute to TV past and present, and gives us a reason to re-link something having to do with Eliza Dushku, which is never a bad thing.

Tyson

In 2005, Luc Besson penned Unleashed, which starred Bob Hoskins as a particularly nasty gangster and Jet Li, who he’s literally raised as a dog, as his feral, martial arts-gifted enforcer. It seemed a silly conceit for an action film, something just outrageous enough to serve as a juicy hook while also providing a modicum of emotional mooring so Li could crack skulls in sympathetic fashion as he moved toward becoming a self-actualized adult.



Strangely, it was Unleashed that first came to mind while watching James Toback’s Tyson, a gripping documentary about the former undisputed heavyweight champion who flamed out in a haze of drugs, car crashes and outside-the-ring violence and criminal behavior. After all, despite standing under six feet and never topping 219 pounds during his professional career, Mike Tyson comes across here as the original “manimal,” a fierce, brutal and unrelentingly single-minded boxing machine who took no mercy on opponents in part because none was ever taken on him in adolescence.

Tyson grabs viewers from the first frame. An exercise in subjectivity (Tyson is the only present-day interviewee, though others are glimpsed in archival footage), the film cuts a cursory swath through his heartbreaking childhood in poverty-stricken Brooklyn, and quickly hones in on Tyson’s relationship with Cus D’Amato. A trainer who helped rescue Tyson from juvenile detention, D’Amato became his legal guardian in 1984, taking the teenager into his own home and giving focus to his rage before dying of pneumonia at 77 years of age. With the same management team put in place by D’Amato overseeing his life, both personally and professionally, Tyson would be able to stay focused for four or five more years before spiraling wildly out of control. A turbulent one-year marriage to actress Robin Givens — which spawned headlines about car crashes, money squabbles, drunken screaming matches and worse — yielded a divorce, followed by depression, drug abuse, professional humiliation and all manner of wildly antisocial behavior.

It would be easy to open the movie with footage of Tyson’s stunning loss to Buster Douglas — perhaps the biggest upset ever in an individual sport — but Toback instead showcases the 20-year-old Tyson’s first title fight, a destruction of Trevor Berbick. This savvy reset is a smart approach, as it whets one’s appetite, no matter how much they may or may not know about Tyson or his fight career, for an exploration of exactly how the failure of this unstoppable athletic specimen came to unfold.

Using a slightly overlapping dialogue technique, as well as occasionally shifting split screens, Toback infuses the movie with a sense of restlessness and kinetic energy, which is certainly in keeping with its subject’s digressive mindset. The portrait that slowly emerges, in Polaroid-esque fashion, is a heartbreakingly conflicting one, of both wounded child and raging beast. Tyson is like the tangled mess of cords behind your television entertainment center; all raw nerve endings and intense surface feelings, he’s an emotional, unchecked id without any of the adult tools — in terms of either formal education or mooring life experiences — to substantively cope with his problems.

As a film, Tyson‘s only uncomfortable failing, really, has to do with the lens of subjectivity — otherwise a strong point — that it refuses to modify when it comes to the boxer’s rape conviction and other charges of domestic abuse. While Tyson does address each of these incidents, he has previously proven himself to be an unreliable or vague narrator (sometimes charmingly so), and the short shrift  given these serious incidents feels a bit unseemly. The omission of certain biographical facts (Tyson’s father, whom he never knew, is said to have fathered 16 kids), or a bit more about the therapy, if any, that has calmed Tyson would have also helped round and deeper shade the movie, but as is it remains a fascinating portrait of an unlikely but oddly compelling modern-day Shakespearean figure. (Sony Pictures Classics, R, 90 minutes)

Trevor Moore Talks Prosthetic Genitals, Hugh Hefner, Road Trips

Rubber-faced Trevor Moore is thus far best known as part of the New York-bred The Whitest Kids U Know, a comedy collective that got snapped up for their own show by IFC. That point of reference could be changing, though. Along with fellow “Whitest Kid” Zach Cregger, Moore recently made the leap to feature films as a writer-director-star of Miss March, about a virginal guy who wakes up from a four-year coma to discover
his high school girlfriend is now a Playmate. With his hornball friend
(played by Moore) urging him to finally partake of carnal knowledge,
road trip shenanigans ensue as the pair scheme to crash a party at the Playboy Mansion. I caught up with Moore recently, to talk
prosthetic genitals, explaining slang to Hugh Hefner and the
gamesmanship involved in going Greyhound
. An excerpted Q&A from the conversation is available over at H Magazine.

American High School

I don’t think I had unreasonable expectations. After all, any movie that claims as its top selling point the fact that it features “top MTV reality personalities and other up-and-coming celebrities” is obviously not likely a candidate for enshrinement by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences. Still, I humbly and sincerely submit that American High School is a movie every bit as terrible as if not worse than the single worst American high school experience of any teenager of the past quarter century. It is a war crime in celluloid form.

It’s the final week of senior year, and everything is coming to a head. Distressed SoCal high schooler Gwen (Jillian Murray, in a departure from her role in Disney Channel’s upcoming TV series Sonny with a Chance) and her exhibitionist husband (yep, you read that right) Holden Adams (Talan Torriero) are perhaps headed for divorce. Gwen’s rich and popular rival, described as “a devil with a vagina,” is Hillary Weiss (Aubrey O’Day, Danity Kane pop princess turned Playboy cover girl), a scheming manipulator who’ll do anything to both nab the prom queen crown and steal Holden away. Toss in a diminutive principal (Martin Klebba, because dwarves equal automatic laughs, right?), a vapid art teacher who inexplicably dresses in lingerie (Nikki Ziering, former Playboy Playmate and jock-warmer to Beverly Hills
90210
star Ian Ziering) and two trash-talking himbos (James Foley and Brian Drolet, of The Hills) who go by the monikers Matt Mysterio and Jonny Awesome. Then mix along with a handful of other slutty associates and students, scramble nonsensically, and serve, steaming.

I don’t at all mind “dumb” comedy, and can even forgive production values compromised by a low budget, but American High School is idiotic and infuriating because there’s absolutely no interior logic to its story, nor does it work in any way, shape or form as a series of discrete hormonal sketches. Right out of the box, Gwen is pegged as “unpopular,” when there’s hearty evidence to the contrary. The movie treats her marriage to Holden as neither legitimate and sincere, nor satirical, so it never really makes any sense that Gwen would be concerned about what peers to whom she’s tethered for only one more year claim to think of her. This fact — a huge story point — is emblematic of the lack of attention and thought given the narrative. Let’s see… what else is never adequately explained? A few parts of the movie unfold in direct-address to a webcam. Male students wander around without shirts, and sometimes run assemblies. Oh, and the principal is a hornball who plays grab-ass with an exchange student, which only seems to further turn on his secretary.

None of these bits are clever, genre-tweaking satire, though, a la Not Another Teen Movie. Sometimes the absurdity is accepted, sometimes commented upon. All the jokes and dialogue, meanwhile, are uniformly awful, and there’s simply nothing here, no overall through line or purpose. To dull the pain, about halfway through the movie I started pounding rum-and-Cokes, but it wasn’t enough to summon laughter, alas. There’s only one truly funny moment in the movie, and it comes in the first 20 minutes or so and lasts all of two seconds; it’s when Klebba’s principal allows himself a moment of quiet self-satisfaction after using the school’s P.A. system, and murmurs, “Another amazing announcement.” The single other time I laughed or cracked a smile occurred when a gummy-tacked wall poster fell down in the background of a long shot, and then immediately reappeared in the next shot. Oh, and for the record, to those in the under-17 set just looking for some cheap boobs-and-butt action, Ziering provides the movie’s only nudity (though, as mentioned,
there’s lots of shirtlessness on the guys’ parts too), but her enormous, surgically enhanced breasts are matched in their unnerving nature by her plasticized face; it’s all a non-starter, fellas.

Housed in a white, regular plastic Amaray case, American High School comes presented in 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen, with a Dolby digital 5.1 surround sound audio track and optional English subtitles for the deaf and hearing-impaired, who’ve never had it so lucky as when missing all the lame, ADR-appended air-quote jokes crammed along this movie’s edges. The chief supplemental feature is a feature-length audio commentary track with writer-director Sean Patrick Cannon, producer Raquel Tolmaire, and actors Murray, Drolet,
Ashley Ann Cook and Nick Shakoour
. Cannon repeatedly says “I like this,” scene after scene, and talks a lot about how he favors triangular composition, like he’s the next Orson Welles. Everyone else seems rather (surprisingly) genuinely stoked by the results; there’s precious little talk of budgetary compromise or production hardships, though Murray scores a few points for honesty by pointing out (the very visually obvious) microphone pack on her leg in one scene. Other bonus features consist of a TV spot and the theatrical trailer, along with 19 more excruciating minutes of deleted scenes and an alternate ending, all with optional audio commentary from Cannon and his actors. If for some reason you still feel the need to purchase the film on DVD, via Amazon, click here. F (Movie) C (Disc)

No Movie Ads for Newspapers on the Horizon

In his Big Picture blog, Patrick Goldstein underlines the slow, steady slide of movie newspaper advertising, and the (further) trouble this spells for newspapers, if/when such advertising eventually becomes, as one studio marketing chief predicts, a seasonal expenditure. I know, I know… “the sky is blue, water is wet.” What else is new? If newspapers in general are doomed, from a readership/business model perspective, of course it stands to reason that an abandonment of advertising will be a contributing cause of their demise. Still, there are some interesting details in the interstices. Pam Levine, Fox’s co-president of marketing, gives smart answers about the evolving logic behind print media ad buys, and cites notable exceptions in the form of Slumdog Millionaire and Marley & Me.

Tangentially, I would only take exception with Goldstein’s assertion that Fox is held in high regard for its marketing savvy. Fox Searchlight? Yes, absolutely. Notwithstanding its superb work on Marley & Me, however, 20th Century Fox has taken such great steps toward authoritarian “message control” that they frequently border on all-out suppression; it often seems as if they’re actively attempting to help eradicate film critics once and for all.

Fair game if that’s their druthers, I guess, whatever… except that it doesn’t really seem to be helping their movies at the box office on a consistent basis. Take, for instance, last summer’s almost non-existent critical/ancillary campaign for The X-Files: I Want to Believe. Am I to believe that more aggressive, non-TV-related outreach — including print advertising, to help reach older fans of the TV series, who might now have families, and not be surfing IGN for updates on a weekly basis — couldn’t have helped push the movie’s total domestic haul past $21 million?

A Class Apart

Part of the “American Experience” series, A Class Apart: A Mexican American Civil Rights Story runs approximately one hour, and highlights the landmark 1950s Supreme Court case that redefined civil rights for Mexican Americans in the United States. Award-winning producers Carlos Sandoval (Farmingville) and Peter Miller (Sacco and Vanzetti) tell the historic tale of how a small-town Texas murder case spurred the Mexican American civil rights movement and helped end Jim Crow-style discrimination throughout the Southwest.

In the tiny town of Edna, Texas, in 1951, field hand Pete Hernandez killed tenant farmer Joe Espinosa after exchanging words in a gritty cantina. From this seemingly unremarkable small-town murder emerged a landmark civil rights case that would forever change the lives and legal standing of tens of millions of Americans. This film tells the little-known story of a band of underdog Mexican American lawyers who took their case, Hernandez v. Texas, all the way to the Supreme Court. In the unprecedented case, the attorneys forged a daring legal strategy, arguing that Mexican Americans were essentially “a class apart,” and therefore did not neatly fit into a legal structure that heretofore recognized only blacks and whites. As various legal skirmishes played out, the lawyers emerged as brilliant, dedicated and humorous men, although A Class Apart doesn’t shy away from showing their flaws as well.

Documentaries like A Class Apart are eye-opening not the least because they exist on the edges of any sort of polite distillation of social upheaval one might typically find in regular middle and high school textbooks. With clarity, heartrending humanity and even mordant wit, when appropriate, this film dramatically interweaves the disparate stories of its central characters
— activists and lawyers, returning veterans and ordinary citizens,
murderer and victim — within the broader history of Latinos in the United States. At a time when immigrants are again being vilified in some corners of public discourse, it’s an important reminder that efforts to ensure America’s actions match its rich, inspiring rhetoric must never cease.

Housed in a regular plastic Amaray case, A Class Apart is presented in 16×9 widescreen, and comes with a superb slate of supplemental features, anchored by a making-of featurette that includes interviews, photographs and behind-the-scenes footage. In addition to special material for educators and a clutch of bonus scenes, there’s also a slideshow of photographer Russell Lee’s iconic images of Mexican American life in the late 1940s. Naturally, Spanish subtitles and a Spanish language audio track are also included as well. To order A Class Apart, or any DVD release from PBS Home Video, call (800) PLAY-PBS or click here. B+ (Movie) B+ (Disc)

A Look at Look’s Banned “Obscene” Postcards

There was a brief hullabaloo a week-plus ago when it was announced that promotional postcards for writer-director Adam Rifkin’s Look (releasing to DVD May 5 via Anchor Bay) were being rejected by the U.S. Postal Service for obscenity.

These are those postcards, which eventually arrived in my mailbox in two separate envelopes, each marked as “sexually oriented advertising.” Great, so now my postwoman knows thinks I’m a perv. If you ask me, this is totally a fix-is-in publicity stunt, a feeling the above-linked video in which Rifkin allegedly first finds out about the decision doesn’t do much to dissuade. Yes, black bars cover the thong-clad butts, but there’s the impression of willful envelope-pushing, of previously tested boundaries being poked — otherwise, why go with the cost of a multi-card mailing campaign at all, instead of an embedded viral email campaign? (Not sure, incidentally, why the first postcard rates an exclamation point, but not the second one; if one legal revelation is more shocking than the other, surely it’s the latter, no?) That said, this is a smart play, and certainly a net win for all involved: Rifkin can appear aggrieved, act shocked and get publicity for his film (look, I’m writing about it), and the USPS can score a few points with all the Sam Brownback, James Dobson and Roberta Combs types.

The Poker Club

Over the last five years or so, while still occasionally taking the skulking, low-key, payday gig (Quarantine, Prom Night), actor Johnathon Schaech has quietly branched out into screenwriting, setting himself up for a chance, at least, at a successful second act in Hollywood as a reliable, single-stop peddler of low-budget, direct-to-video genre fare. I say single-stop because in his latest movie, The Poker Club, Schaech assumes multiple roles, nabbing a prominent on-screen role as well as several behind-the-scenes credits.

Directed by Tim McCann (Nowhere Man, Runaway), The Poker Club centers around secrets lies, and ill-advised decision-making. For years, Aaron Tyler (Schaech) has been getting together on Monday evenings with his three best friends to play poker. One night, though, everything changes forever; a burglar breaks into Aaron’s house, and the men accidentally kill him. Fearing the consequences, Aaron and his pals dispose of the corpse and agree to take the secret to their graves. Soon, however, they discover that someone else knows what they’ve done, and is now playing a murderous game of revenge with them.

Johnny Messner, Loren Dean, Michael Risley, Scrubs‘ Judy Reyes, Lori Heuring (with whom Schaech has a naked history), and Jana Kramer all co-star in this streamlined flick, which obviously cops moves from panic-infused cover-up tales like I Know What You Did Last Summer and its sequels, as well as Very Bad Things. In fact, The Poker Club could use a little of that latter film’s wild, trippy energy, because too frequently the plotting here feels like laid track, and the twists and turns thus little but pulled levers. Perhaps there was a more acutely sketched sense of betrayal and intrigue in Ed Gorman’s popular horror novel, from which the movie is adapted. The writing team of Schaech and Richard Chizmar (who penned the sequel to Roadhouse, in which Schaech also starred) comes up with some nice wheel-spinning dialogue for when the bitterness and recrimination between friends really comes to a boil, but McCann — while piecing things together nicely in a few charged what-do-we-do scenes, and generally making effective use of music — is overall unable to come up with a compelling, unifying visual scheme for the film.

Housed in a regular plastic Amaray case, The Poker Club comes presented in 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen, with an English language 5.1 Dolby digital audio track and optional subtitles in only English, French and Chinese, which runs somewhat counter to both the title’s easily translated genre thrills and poker’s reputation as a burgeoning worldwide hobby. The sole supplemental feature is a feature-length audio commentary track with Schaech and director McCann, but the pair have an easy rapport that makes their chat go down fairly smoothly. It’s also an instructive listen for would-be filmmakers and on-the-rise line producers, as various means of cost-effectiveness are frequently addressed. To purchase the DVD via Amazon, click here. C (Movie) C+ (Disc)

But It’s Safer than Your Typical Weekend Meth Binge…

Over at MSNBC, Alonso Duralde has a blast with the bafflingly not-screened-for-critics Crank: High Voltage, saying, “Imagine a gonzo collaboration between Jean-Luc Godard, Michael Bay and Tex Avery on a weekend meth binge, and you begin to get an idea of what writer-directors Mark Neveldine and Brad Taylor have up their sleeves.” Meanwhile, somewhere, Amy Smart throws up gang signs, and yells, “Holla!“