Daily Archives: January 22, 2009

The Deal

A screwball-style, Hollywood-tweaking romantic comedy starring William H. Macy and Meg Ryan, version 2.0, The Deal is a movie that overcomes one of the most terribly obvious PhotoShopped covers of recent memory, as well as a back cover that misspells the name of one of its main characters. In addition to affording screen capture enthusiasts more opportunities to gawk at Macy’s bare ass, the film gives its talented multi-hyphenate a fun chance to play roguish and oblivious. Put it on the front end of a double bill with a Chinese takeout buffet and David Mamet’s State and Main, also starring Macy, and you have yourself a pleasant little evening.

Adapted by Macy and director Steven Schachter from Peter Lefcourt’s book of the same name, The Deal opens with despondent, washed-up Hollywood producer Charlie Berns (Macy) trying to off himself, only to be interrupted by his nephew Lionel (Jason Ritter), an idealistic screenwriter who’s penned a script about former British prime minister Benjamin Disraeli. Seizing on the touted desires of Bobby Mason (LL Cool J, standing in for, oh, Vin Diesel, let’s say), a meatheaded action star and recent convert to Judiasm, to delve into more Jewish-centric material, Berns gets it in his head to take Lionel’s earnest, wholly uncommercial script and turn it into a wildly reimagined, thunderously stupid “freedom fighter” biopic. Wheeling and dealing, planting bogus stories of a bidding war in the trades, Charlie gets a hit-hungry studio desperate to get onboard a Mason picture to snap up the screenplay, and he then shrewdly taps Mason’s manager for rewrite duties. Along the way, Charlie becomes enamored with Deidre Hearn (Ryan), the slightly stuffy, self-serious development executive assigned to fast track the project.

Beginning with the second act, The Deal pivots to South Africa (where it was actually entirely filmed), chronicling the making of Berns and Hearn’s movie, where all sorts of various emergencies flare up, from a temperamental director to a nervous star. With cost-conscious studio execs already circling, Mason gets kidnapped by Muslim extremists. Things look bleak, but an emboldened Deidre finally comes around to Charlie’s damn-the-consequences style, and convinces him to take part in an on-the-fly refashioning of the movie as a legitimate arthouse endeavor.

The Deal‘s dialogue has a nice, ’30s-style patter to it, whether in incidental, passing fancy (“Good job, Hun,” says Charlie, walking past a costumed marauder on the studio lot) or the many scenes in which Charlie tries (and eventually succeeds in) getting into Deidre’s power-suit pants. Not everything works. In fact, the whole kidnapped-movie-star bit was much more effectively played out in last summer’s Tropic Thunder; here it’s just a throwaway gag — albeit a big, plot-shifting one — and then we’re off and running in another direction, never to actually see Mason’s character again. If that sort of abrupt, tacks-underneath-the-tires narrative switcheroo — where you think you’re headed one way, narratively speaking, only to be suddenly thrust in another direction — seems a bit like the storytelling equivalent of sand in the eyes during a playground fight, in the end it doesn’t much matter. Wry and dirty-minded, Macy absolutely steamrolls scenes, and if there’s a big tonal misstep midway through that unnecessarily tries to bring shading to his character — a maudlin sequence where Charlie finds out about the marriage of his adult daughter — most of the movie is content to just let Macy hoodwink folks, like a shrugging, devil-may-care loafer. That’s a plenty good deal, it turns out.

Housed in a regular plastic Amray case with a deep-set, single circular nesting notch, The Deal comes to DVD presented in 1.78:1 widescreen, with Dolby digital 5.1 surround sound and 2.0 stereo audio tracks. Apart from the theatrical trailer for the movie, the only other bonus feature is a 17-minute making-of featurette. It’s chock full of interviews from all the major players, both on screen and off, but Macy holds forth with many of the best ruminations, positing that Hollywood is for the most part a microcosm of society, and also that a writer watching a movie get made from his book is a bit like watching someone make love to one’s wife. “What are they supposed to say,” Macy jokes. “‘Good job?'” There’s also a digital download copy of the film included on the disc, for rip-and-play portability. To purchase the DVD via Amazon, click here. B (Movie) C+ (Disc)

Jeff Dowd Talks More About Sundance Dust-Up

At Sundance, Variety critic John Anderson punched Dirt! producer Jeff Dowd in the face. Via the film’s publicist, Dowd sent out an e-mail discussing the incident. Now there’s more. A lot more. So who am I to deny the Dude a chance to (inimitably) speak his mind? Extended excerpts from Dowd’s long second missive regarding the incident:

“Film criticism is fine, but ill-informed assumptions about how the public will react are not what is best for the planet and not in the spirit of the dialogue that goes on at Sundance. He simply didn’t do a reporter’s homework and listen to audience members before saying, ‘People will not respond to this film.’

What especially bothered me is when I told John how well the audiences were reacting, John said: ‘They are just sheep.’ Had he stayed for the Q&A, John would have seen that these were some pretty smart sheep, who see a lot of films and are perfectly capable of critical thinking and also have a deep enough analysis of what’s going on in the world today and how Dirt! The Movie and what it shows is possible can play an important role in making life on our planet better before it is too late. I guess I am just a sucker for inspired sheep more than critical lemmings who are about to go of the cliff’s edge.

I think this is why John and Laura Kim conducted an extensive interview with me for their fine book I Wake Up Screening. I spoke about the relationship of movies I had worked on, like Academy Award winners Hearts and Minds, Chariots of Fire and Gandhi as well as War Games and many documentaries like those of my friend Neil Young, and how they opened people’s hearts and minds and inspired them and therefore gained tremendous critical, media and grassroots support. I reminded John of this yesterday and said I believe based on the reaction of several hundred ‘sheep’ at four screenings that Dirt! The Movie will be one such film. I know that by the shank of the fest critics are justifiably burnt-out, nonetheless John simply didn’t allow himself to see the reality here.We are at a historic time when information and dialogue are the life-blood of democracy and are essential to the future of the planet. At this time when we are at THE CLIFF’S EDGE (caps his), gratefully informative and hopeful movies like Dirt! The Movie deserve discussion, not the simple dismissal John was unfortunately giving it.”

Now, more about the fisticuffs, specifically:

“After a couple minutes of calm discussion with John as we walked from the Holiday Cinemas to the Yarrow, he decided to cut off the conversation because he had a breakfast meeting (ironically with Diane Weyerman, formerly the head of Sundance Docs and now at Particpant Productions, which is all about progressive films like An Inconvenient Truth and grassroots follow-up. I had also spoken with Jeff Skoll, founder of Particpant, about Dirt!, and he was interested).

So after John left I had a choice: Do I let John write a review which I felt at best was half the story and would be the first review out of Sundance, or do I try to re-engage him? What would you do? What would Gandhi or Martin Luther King or Rosa Parks or Michael Moore do at that moment in time? What was my responsibility to the filmmakers, the sheep who loved the film, my two daughters and the future of the planet? Should the Dude say fuck it and just go bowling or should I not let this intellectual aggression stand and try to re-engage John? I went into the Yarrow dinning room and sat down next to John and Diane and said: “John, I think this is worthy of more discussion.” He responded: “I am trying to have my breakfast and if you don’t leave I am going to punch you out.” He then rose and screamed, “Throw this riff raff out of here.”

I left and ran into the Dirt! filmmakers heading into the Yarrow to have breakfast and conduct an interview. At that moment Jackie “The Jokeman” Martlin of The Howard Stern Show came up to me and said: “Jeff, what a great film Dirt! is. I learned so much and was so inspired.” As we walked into the dinning room I introduced Jackie to John Anderson, who was about eight feet away on the other side of a table for six and said: “John, here is one of those people who liked Dirt!.” John said, “Are you a friend of Jeff’s?” Jackie responded: “I know Jeff, but the point is that this is a very important and inspiring film.” John said: “I am trying to eat my breakfast.” Jackie said: “I understand but this may be more important than you continuing to eat your breakfast for a bit.”

John then turned red and rose up and said: “Jeff, I warned you I was going to punch you out if you tried to talk to me anymore.” I stood there with my hands at my sides. (I am a wrestler and an activist, and we are trained to keep our hands down so as a wrestler we can tackle someone if necessary and as an activist so our hands raised won’t be mis-interpreted as a possible attack position.) John then approached me and threw three jabs to my chest , shoulder and head. None of them even fazed me, which I think surprised John, who works out and has a stance that looks like he has indeed boxed. He turned and started to walk away a few paces and then looked at me and walked back and threw his best solid jab at my mouth, trying to floor me. My head went back a few inches but it didn’t faze me either. I only hope John doesn’t find himself in a real situation where he overestimates his boxing skills and gets hurt.

We left and the manager came up to us and said he had called the police to arrest John. When the police arrived several people came up to the Park City police officer Bob deBotelho and gave him their business cards and said they wanted to testify that John assaulted me. The same was true of many restaurant staff members. In all fairness, Nick Frazier from the BBC and a colleague told the officer that they felt I was harassing John. They of course hadn’t seen the movie, or witnessed John’s anti-intellectual and un-democratic attitude towards me. And as a Jew and an Irishmen I of course understand that there is an unfortunate tradition of British violence and failure to get to the bottom of the story — Tony Blair! I have faith that when Nick sees Dirt! and hears the whole story he will be able to make a distinction between harassment and intellectual engagement at crucial times in history. Maybe he should ask Lord David Puttnam (the producer of Chariots of Fire) about me.

The officer said: “I have more than enough witnesses to arrest the assailant, do you want to press charges?” I declined at that time because I like John, I think he is a good journalist and critic and a person who is a dad and someone who cares about our planet and future. And I don’t think he is a danger to society or would inflict violence on women. He was just having an overwhelming and busy day which had severely lowered his intellectual capacity to room temperature, and was clearly needing food more than ideas and inspiration at that moment. Under other circumstances we might have shared a meal together, had a good conversation and I might have learned from him and he from me.”

Oscar Nominations Announced, Irking Disney and Warner Bros.

After cleaning up with various critics groups and other film-honoring bodies, and going 1-2 at the Los Angeles Film Critics Association awards, commercial juggernauts Wall▪E and The Dark Knight both got relegated to somewhat unfortunately expected, consolation-type booby prizes: a Best Animated Feature nod for the former, and a Best Supporting Actor nomination for Heath Ledger for the latter, among a mess of other, lesser nods. And that sucks, for different reasons. The rejection of Wall▪E shows the stranglehold that the actors’ branch has on voting (the thinking: “no actors = we’re not voting for it for Best Picture, since it didn’t employ as many of us”), while the stiff-arming of The Dark Knight, especially in light of the embrace of past commercial hits, underscores ingrained genre snobbery, pure and simple. Below are the top-shelf domestic narrative nominations:

Best Picture
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Frost/Nixon
Milk
The Reader
Slumdog Millionaire

Best Director
Danny Boyle, Slumdog Millionaire
Stephen Daldry, The Reader
David Fincher, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Ron Howard, Frost/Nixon
Gus Van Sant, Milk

Best Actor
Richard Jenkins, The Visitor
Frank Langella, Frost/Nixon
Sean Penn, Milk
Brad Pitt, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Mickey Rourke, The Wrestler

Best Actress
Anne Hathaway, Rachel Getting Married
Angelina Jolie, Changeling
Melissa Leo, Frozen River
Meryl Streep, Doubt
Kate Winslet, The Reader

Best Supporting Actor
Josh Brolin, Milk
Robert Downey Jr., Tropic Thunder
Philip Seymour Hoffman, Doubt
Heath Ledger, The Dark Knight
Michael Shannon, Revolutionary Road

Best Supporting Actress
Amy Adams, Doubt
Penelope Cruz, Vicky Cristina Barcelona
Viola Davis, Doubt
Taraji P Henson, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Marisa Tomei, The Wrestler

Best Original Screenplay
Frozen River
In Bruges
Happy-Go-Lucky
Milk
Wall▪E

Best Adapted Screenplay
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Doubt
Frost/Nixon
The Reader
Slumdog Millionaire

Best Animated Feature
Bolt
Kung Fu Panda
Wall▪E

More thoughts later, and in the coming weeks, certainly, but the Best Supporting Actress nominations clearly offer mostly confirmatory love on the part of AMPAS voters — Cruz and Adams are recent nominees, and Tomei a past Oscar winner. Taraji P Henson’s nomination for a solid but unexceptional performance in a very Mammy-ish role in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button is depressing, but indicative of the weird love that film is getting.

The Alphabet Killer

Written by Tom Malloy (who also co-stars in the film), The Alphabet Killer is a decently gripping psychological thriller loosely based on the still-unsolved “double initial” murders that shocked the citizens of Rochester, New York in the early 1970s. The details of the true story? From 1970 to 1973, three girls in and around Rochester were brutally raped and strangled, their bodies dumped in neighboring villages that bore the same first initial as their names. All three victims’ — young girls, aged 10 to 12 — first and last names also had matching initials. Despite the questioning of more than 800 suspects and the combined police resources of several communities, the case remains unsolved to this day.



In the film, Eliza Dushku stars Megan Paige, a police investigator whose commitment to the job borders on obsession. Megan and her partner, Lt. Ken Shine (Cary Elwes), are assigned to investigate the murder of a young girl named Carla Castillo, whose body is found in the nearby town of Churchville. Despite Megan’s considerable efforts, her inability to catch the killer leads to a nervous breakdown, eventually causing her to lose her fiancée, her career in law enforcement career, and her grip on reality.

Two years later, Megan is back at the police department, albeit in a demoted position. With the help of a mental illness support group headed by Richard Ledge (Timothy Hutton), Megan is slowly getting her life back on track. But when two more young girls are murdered with the same “alphabet” modus operandi, Megan becomes convinced the same serial killer has resurfaced. Battling hallucinations of the dead girls — as well as distrust from her colleagues — Megan dives back into the case, determined to bring the culprit to justice. With few leads and fewer concrete suspects, can she catch the “Alphabet Killer” before another victim is found?

There are hints of Flesh and Bone to this thriller, believe it or not, as well as some unreliable narrator/Insomnia-type shiftiness that Malloy craftily works in. (In this regard, the movie earns its stripes as part of a perfectly nutty Dushku double-dip, alongside the recent Nobel Son.) Director Rob Schmidt, who previously worked with Dushku on the thriller Wrong Turn, shoots the affair in a fairly straightforward fashion, but also has a nice sense of when to slow-play things to string along the tension. Dushku, who’s set to return to the small screen next month in the upcoming Fox series Dollhouse, does a fairly decent job overall, but also leans on a few mannered, TV acting tics that help keep her performance from being more of a naturalistic, rooted thing. If there’s a codifying strength here, other than the creepy fact that this is a speculative thriller, rooted in fact, it’s the movie’s superb supporting cast — the aforementioned bit players, plus Tom Noonan, recent Oscar nominee Melissa Leo, Larry Hankin, Bill Moseley, Jack McGee and Michael Ironside. They help give the film a sense of depth, and genuineness, that eludes a lot of straight-to-video crime dramas.

Housed in a regular plastic Amray case in turn stored in a cardboard slipcover with matching art, The Alphabet Killer is presented in 2.35:1 anamorphic widescreen, with a Dolby digital 5.1 audio track. Two audio commentaries highlight the DVD’s special features. The first is with producer Isen Robbins and director Schmidt (Crime + Punishment in Suburbia, the “Masters of Horror” series hour-long flick Right to Die), the latter of whom talks some about his cameo in the film as a cop who discovers a body in a rock quarry. Also, somewhat uncomfortably and hilariously, Schmidt picks the exact moment of Dushku’s brief topless scene to say “It felt like the right time for her to play a woman.” The audio commentary track with writer-producer-actor Malloy is thankfully much more interesting and engaging. In breathless fashion, Malloy drops mad anecdotes and mundane details alike (Elwes wearing his BlueTooth in a scene), as well as pointing out his mother’s filing secretary cameo. In more substantive monologues, he expounds upon the themes of “man versus self” (or woman, really) in the movie; he also drops an amusing sideways crack on Ralph Fiennes when he touts co-star Noonan’s work in Manhunter.

Finally, wrapping up the slate of bonus material is a three-minute, time-coded, alternate version of the movie’s opening scene — an investigatory traipse through the woods by Dushku and Elwes — and a completely pointless six-minute featurette that strings together a bunch of behind-the-scenes footage under music. Some of the latter material looks interesting on the surface, but without some context or linking interviews, however, this tells us nothing of substance about the movie. To purchase the DVD via Amazon, click here. B- (Movie) C+ (Disc)

Nation Heartily Embraces Paul Blart; More Mall Cop Flicks Await

Struggling with a friend and colleague earlier this week to understand the astonishing $34 million opening weekend gross of Paul Blart: Mall Cop — a near-$10,000 per screen average, and a number that I hear surprised even Sony’s in-house number-crunchers, by a significant margin — this was the best I could come up with:

“My only theory (which is admittedly not a very good one) is that in the same way that Christmas releases will boost the returns of certain films — since families are together and looking for something to do that doesn’t involve more talking about Uncle John’s new boyfriend or Aunt Sally’s recent DUI — maybe folks gearing up for the Inauguration celebration wanted a collective mental health break, a way to definitively check out of the real world for a bit, and laugh at the fat guy who couldn’t slide all the way across the floor. I’d be fascinated in the complete regional box office receipt breakdowns on the movie, and urban vs. rural, etcetera. Of course, I think this cracked theory could only account for a couple million dollars, so I don’t know — maybe Kevin James is morphing into the new Tim Allen, i.e., the TV star turned “safe” movie lead, in kind of bland, middle-of-the-road, family-friendly fare. Didn’t see that coming…”

SAG Awards Media Advisory Touts Grocery List

Just in case anyone was wondering, I’ve been sent a SAG Awards media advisory which informs me that “Jackson’s Catering purveyor order for the event” includes the following: 225 pounds of crab, five pounds of fresh dill, 20 gallons of vegetable stock, 400 Seckle pears, 20 pounds each of dried apricots, figs and black olives, three gallons of sweet corn, 40 gallons of pomegranate juice and six gallons of olive oil. Granted, I just pulled those items from a much longer list and left out all the alcohol (which includes Champagne Taittinger Brut La Française… ooh la la) to make it seem really weird. But it’s the people with this sort of inventory that I always seem to get stuck behind at the grocery store. The 15th annual awards ceremony
for the Screen Actors Guild jumps off on Sunday, January 25, at the Shrine Exposition Center, and will be simulcast live on TBS and TNT.

Jeff Dowd Talks About Fight with Variety’s John Anderson

So the big news swirling around Sundance today was of course that Jeff Dowd, a producer on the film Dirt! and the basis of Jeff Bridges’ character in The Big Lebowski, got punched in the face by Variety critic John Anderson after a disagreement and extended argument/conversation/monologue about the documentary. (Anne Thompson rounds up the situation nicely here, including interviews with the principals.) Not there, so I’ll spare my thoughts. But Dowd’s remarks on the incident, passed along by Dirt! publicist Mickey Cottrell, are as follows:

“My disagreement with John was not over his critical reaction, which he has every right to, but his statement that the film wouldn’t appeal to the public. I suggested he come back into the theater for the Q&A, and he would observe what we had seen at all for [sic] screenings — that audiences felt the film had all kinds of new information and practical solutions. It wasn’t homework, but hope made pragmatic on how we can change the planet in keeping with Obama’s Inauguration speech. I told John one of scores of examples of this was when John Densmore of The Doors stood up at our first screening (after a sustained audience applause at the end) and said, ‘I have my own film here — which I clearly care about — but here is my ballot which I marked 4 stars because Dirt! is the film that should win the Sundance Festival.’ That was emblematic of all the great feedback. I just asked John Anderson to put that in the mix before making assumptions that audiences would respond negatively. It should also be said that a vast majority of audience members liked the film not just because they ‘support the cause.’ We have heard dozens of comments about the quality of the filmmaking as well. In the spirit of John Waters, we even had smell-o-vision at one screening where you could smell the sweet earthy scent of dirt and mother Earth.”