Daily Archives: January 24, 2008

Death, Celebrity and Heath Ledger

Just a couple days ago, flipping past E!’s unabashedly
whorish entertainment news show
on television, I came across a quick-hit report
— designed to serve as a teaser lead-in, so that Ryan Seacrest could peddle
footage of the erstwhile pop princess’ latest shopping excursion, or whatever —
in which the Associated Press essentially confirmed that they’d already worked
up the bulk of their obituary on Britney Spears
, saying something to the effect
of, “We of course wish Britney nothing but the best in these difficult times,
but we have to be prepared.”

I was pretty bowled over at the time (why would E! fish for
this rather callous and insignificant nugget, and why would the AP even confirm
it?), but this bit was among the first thoughts that came surging into my mind
when hearing about Heath Ledger’s tragic death in New York on Tuesday.

The difference between this misfortune with Ledger and something
like the recent passing of fellow actor Brad Renfro (apart from their
respective profiles) is a matter chiefly of expectation — reflected and
refracted in peculiar ways, both privately and publicly
. Almost everyone I came
across and talked with about the event on Tuesday, or read a blurbed reaction
from, expressed considerable surprise in addition to the more standard sympathetic
compassion. I know I did: “What?,”
I asked, upon first hearing the news.

It’s always such a big jolt when a death like this doesn’t
match the air-quote public persona of the star
. True tragedy, and certainly
fatal accidents (which this event is leaning more and more in the direction
of), don’t happen to people like this; money and fame protects them, right? It
gives them all sorts of buyout clauses and extra chances? The truth is, sometimes it doesn’t. Sometimes there is a
plane crash, or an automobile accident. Sometimes there is an accidental
overdose of prescription medications. Sometimes there is an undetected heart
condition, or cancer. And that gives us mental pause, because celebrities are America’s
own royalty
.

It’s not merely grappling with a cultural loss that feeds
shock and astonishment
; we expect and accept, often with a shrug, the deaths of
high-profile actors, directors, musicians and the like. They wash over us,
however lionized they are (even I couldn’t tell you with any degree of
confidence about the death dates of artists whose work I tremendously respect),
until retrospective reminders at the Academy Awards or some other televised
event remind us. We presume, too, the deaths of certain performers given to histories
of excess (John Belushi, Anna Nicole Smith, Chris Farley, the aforementioned Renfro) long before
their actual passing. Ergo, I guess, the locked-and-loaded obituary for Spears,
and no doubt Lindsay Lohan. But when it happens to celebrities seemingly out of the
blue, like John Ritter or Aaliyah, or now Ledger, we don’t know what to do.
Conspiracies or other outlandish theories crop up; rumors run rampant.

So, in the hours following the Ledger story breaking, and
into the next day, cable news channels — because simple expressions of
disbelief can only fill so much airtime — still struggled to make the death fit
into their preformed narrative templates about “
Hollywood
lifestyle.”
Rich evidence of this abounds, whether in the mis-reportage about
the apartment in which Ledger was found being Mary-Kate Olsen’s (ooh, link him
to another celebrity), the $20 bill “folded in a suspicious manner” (now
confirmed as free from any drug residue, an ordinary Andrew Jackson), or awards
prognosticator and professional opinion slinger Tom O’Neil waxing enthusiastically
and imaginatively on CNN as to the encoded meaning of Ledger’s personal hygiene
during an interview from several months prior.

As the surprise and sadness from his death fades, the
challenges facing two projects still in production in which Ledger appears — July’s The Dark Knight,
from Warner Bros., and director Terry Gilliam’s The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus — will of course come
into starker relief, and keep news of his death in the public realm.

Gilliam in particular has a heartrending history of
unusually rough financing and production problems, so much so that it’s even
been lampooned by The Onion. A half-decade ago, his attempt to film The Man Who
Killed Don Quixote
was beset by bombing at a nearby NATO range,
once-in-a-generation flash floods and the herniated disc of his lead actor,
resulting in 2002’s Lost in La
Mancha
, a documentary of darkly comedic devolution.

For Warner Bros., the stakes are even bigger. The follow-up
to their hugely successful and critically embraced franchise reboot, Batman Begins, The Dark Knight is a tent-pole
summer release for the studio, and Ledger’s dark, seemingly twisted take on the
homicidal Joker was at the forefront of their marketing campaign
, which will
almost surely now see an overhaul.

Still, whatever is done, Ledger’s death — its suddenness and
seeming inexplicability — will almost certainly continue to shade and color
perceptions of these projects
, even after the unfathomable particulars are
scientifically explained. As of now, pending final a toxicology report, only six
types of prescription medications — including an antihistamine, and pills to
treat both anxiety and insomnia, which Ledger had previously said he started
suffering during production of The Dark Knight — were found with Ledger upon his death. For a
country so preoccupied, in aspirant-protective fashion, with its celebrities
,
that’s cold comfort, and an unsatisfactory answer. For the full, original op-ed feature piece, from FilmStew, click here.

Bond 22 Title… Is What?

So the new, official title of the 22nd Bond picture was revealed to reporters Thursday at a press conference at Pinewood Studios outside of London, where filming on the movie began earlier this month. And the tabbed moniker is… Quantum of Solace? Look, I don’t want to question whether or not the title was drawn blindly from a fan contest, but… was the title drawn blindly from a fan contest? And besides, wasn’t that the title of one of Stephen Hawking’s best-sellers?

Location shooting is planned for Austria, Italy and Panama, and the film — which picks up where 2006’s Casino Royale left off — of course returns Daniel Craig as Bond and Judi Dench as MI-6 boss M. New additions include pouty hottie Olga Kurylenko and
Mathieu Amalric (The Diving Bell and the Butterfly), who will play the
movie’s villain. If my photo posting was working properly, I could include a few pictures from said press conference, but those will have to wait for another day, it seems. Quantum of Solace opens Stateside and in Great Britain on November 7.

Rambo

Cynically using the decades-long Burmese civil war as a
backdrop for grisly and unremitting violence, muscle-headed action flick Rambo
comes off as a sad and empty attempt to be politically relevant. Coming almost
two decades after the last series entry, and on the heels of the successful
commercial and critical reception of 2006’s Rocky
Balboa
, which located fresh narrative terrain and provided a perfect
emotive bookend to multi-hyphenate Sylvester Stallone’s other signature
franchise, this sloppy, nihilistic effort feels especially sour and out of step
with modern convention
.

Picking up Vietnam
veteran John Rambo’s story some 20 years later, Stallone posits the character
as psychologically unable to return home, now living a solitary, monastic
lifestyle in southeast Asia
. That would be fine, except that this element is
pure window dressing — an excuse for a parade of brutality (including bayoneted
kids) that does nothing except showcase several dozen different ways to take a
life.

The film opens in northern Thailand,
where Rambo ekes out a subsistence catching poisonous snakes for cash
and running a longboat along the Salween
River
. It’s this latter fact that
brings him to the attention of a group of Colorado
missionaries headed up by Sarah Miller (Julie Benz) and Michael Burnett (Paul
Schulze). Sarah, Michael and their group want to go to Burma
to lend moral support to the Karen tribe, an ethnic Christian minority at war
with the internationally isolated ruling military junta. Rambo at first spurns
their request for transport, but eventually relents. Along the way, there’s a
confrontation with Burmese river pirates, and Rambo is forced to abandon his
newfound pacifism in defense of his passengers
.

Weeks later Rambo learns that the missionaries are now being
held captive by a particularly sadistic unit of the Burmese military, obviously
outside of diplomatic reach. He’s hired by the missionaries’ leader to ferry a
team of mercenary soldiers, including gruff director Lewis (Graham McTavish)
and sniper Schoolboy (Matthew Marsden), to the point he last saw the group.
Naturally, Rambo’s conscience kicks in, along with old killer instincts, and
the limbs, heads and throats of many a swarthy Burmese soldier pay the price
.

Rambo opens with real-life images from the quelled
pro-democracy demonstrations in late September of last year, protests which
were met with brutal force. Whether by function of budget constraint or edit, the
rest of the film seems pared down to relatively straightforward action set
piece entanglements
, an ill-advised strategy which casts further doubt on the
movie’s wishes to be taken as anything more than a barely linked series of
lopped arms and exploded chests.

The character of Rambo, a Reagan-era re-branding of the
forward-leaning, wounded ego vigilantism that was left over from the United
States’ Vietnam debacle
, was always going to be more of a relic of time and
place than Rocky, and thus harder to update. The movie’s script, a shared
credit by Stallone and Art Monterastelli, has nothing interesting to say about
that, though, and plumbs its lead character’s psyche solely by way of one
nightmare montage featuring black-and-white footage from the first three films
.
There’s an uncomfortable subtext to be found, too, in the uninterrupted
debasement and abuse of local women, while the same sort of violence against Sarah
is only intimated.

Unanchored to anything of substantive emotional value, the film’s action is suitably explosive and over-the-top —
at one point Rambo rigs an unexploded World War II shell to take out several
hundred yards of jungle — but it reaches such a level of cartoonish extreme so
as to seem almost desperate in its attempt to woo an audience who know the Rambo
films only as late-night cable TV entries
.

Shot on location in and around Chiang
Mai
, Thailand
,
the movie certainly makes good use of its natural surroundings, at least during
daylight exteriors
. A night-time, rain-soaked rescue operation, though — a
centerpiece of the movie’s second act — seems designed chiefly to cheat the
fact that a similar sequence in the light of day would have been much more
costly. Stallone’s staging here is messy and confusing, and cinematographer
Glen MacPherson (16 Blocks, One Missed Call) loses a battle to shadow. The
result is much more irritating than thrilling. Brian Tyler’s very
literal-minded musical compositions, meanwhile, are in perfectly ridiculous
lockstep with the movie’s demonstrative finale. For the full, original, and slightly longer review, from Screen International, click here.

On Blog Photo Wars

I don’t know whether or not to blame Danica Patrick, but problems with GoDaddy’s Blogcast photo uploads continue, and a slew of DVD reviews have disappeared from the system, which is problematic only insomuch as I need time spent trying to figure that out to actually do other stuff… like sleep, and eat.

Other problems abound, though I can still post. And link. That’s fine, of course. But there’s some sort of weird bug in the system. Or ghost in the machine. Or leprechaun in the pantry. Hopefully it gets fixed in time to share that Rosamund Pike picture this weekend. Now I know how Rod Smart felt, poor bastard…