Monthly Archives: June 2006

The Break-Up

The
Break-Up, though, turns these rom-com conventions on their side, and in
doing so colorfully, wittily celebrates what it is about men and women that
both attracts one another and drives us crazy.

By now, of course, the winkingly unacknowledged real-life
love affair between stars Vince Vaughn and Jennifer Aniston has become
compelling tabloid B-plot fodder to the birth of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s
new baby girl, and all but eclipsed the regular Hollywood hype cycle for a
summer release like The Break-Up.
Exactly what that augurs for the movie’s commercial prospects is hard to gauge.
After all, audiences flocked to see Mr. & Mrs. Smith, but not Proof of Life,
which featured a similarly high-profile dalliance between its stars. (And let’s
not even talk about Gigli, please.)
The fact remains, though, that Vaughn, as producer-writer-star of The Break-Up, offers up an ambitious
pass at an “un-romantic comedy,” a legitimately funny movie that traces with
surprising if not unwelcome emotional depth the devolution of a relationship.

Vaughn stars as Gary Grobowski, a garrulous if slightly
doughy charmer who with his two brothers (Vincent D’Onofrio and Cole Hauser)
runs a guided tourist service in Chicago.
The film shows us the first meeting between Gary
and art gallery curator Brooke Meyers (Aniston), at a Cubs-White Sox game, and
then quickly sling-shots us forward several years, after the pair have
purchased a condominium together and settled into a complacent domestic groove.
A hosted dinner with their respective families deteriorates into a bitter
fight, and Brooke impulsively puts an end to their relationship.

Of course, there’s still that matter about their living
arrangements, and over the next couple of weeks things get worse and worse on
that front as well. Petty disagreements over common space, noise and schedule
escalate into Brooke inviting over dates, Gary
inviting over strippers and other actions of comeuppance. The couple’s realtor
(Jason Bateman) and shared friends, including Maddie (Joey Lauren Adams) and
Johnny (Jon Favreau), all get sucked into the fray as well.

Working with screenwriters Jeremy Garelick and Jay Lavender,
Vaughn finds humor in the lack of a fully developed set of social reference
skills
. Comedy is typically a steadfast commitment to the absurd, but here it’s
more about a dedication to Gary’s
oblivious, benignly self-involved infantilism, which Vaughn nails through the
presentation of a sense of humor that masks an insecure petulance
. The Break-Up isn’t “dark,” per se, or as
legendarily big of a comedic departure as Jim Carrey’s work in The Cable Guy, but both Gary and Brooke
are given moments of candid woundedness and the film’s arguments — on the
surface about pool tables and lemon centerpieces, but of course about much more
— are real and substantive
. This is all a way of saying that, despite its
well-seeded outrageousness, The Break-Up
feels remarkably real. For those wanting merely a saccharinized narrative
inversion of the traditional romantic comedy, that will be at times extremely
confounding, especially as the film progresses. In my book, however, it’s a
rare treat.

Director Peyton Reed (Bring
It On
) replicates in properly modulated fashion the nimble tone of his work
on Down With Love, and the film
additionally benefits from its stocking with both bit players with whom Vaughn
has previously worked — including Favreau, Adams, Hauser and Justin Long —
along with those who similarly “get” his gangly, loose-limbed style.

The film slows down a bit in its final third — as much
because of the unnaturalness of its narrative arc as anything else — and Brooke
remains a bit of an enigma. We’re left to infer some of her feelings rather
than bear witness to them. In the end, though, The Break-Up is at least partially notable for what it doesn’t radically reinvent. Tanned,
toned and wrinkled-nose cute, Aniston again ably showcases the full breadth of
stammering uncertainty; Vaughn, meanwhile, summons up yet another iteration of
the character he does best — a free-wheeling man-child. These are two flavors
we’ve tasted separately before, but they’re deeper and more fully rounded here,
and complemented by a fantastic ensemble.
There’s nothing broken about The Break-Up. (Universal,
PG-13, 105 mins.)

David Frankel on Devil Wears Prada

Part Bridget Jones’s
Diary
, part Swimming With Sharks,
Lauren Weisberger’s bestselling 2003 novel The
Devil Wears Prada
— about the hellish life of a top fashion magazine editor’s
assistant — helped birth the seriocomic, New York workplace-set chick lit
subgenre
, capitalizing on the appeal of Sex
in the City
. Yet its translation to the big screen was anything but smooth,
churning through five screenwriters.

“For a long time I think the studio thought of this as a
‘boss from hell movie,’” says director David Frankel
, “and I thought that it
was about two much more complex characters than just the naïf and crazy boss. It’s
about a young girl who has real conflicts about which path to choose in life. It’s
a coming-of-age story for a woman, and it’s about the price of excellence and what
compromises and sacrifices one makes in life to achieve that. (The editor) Miranda represents a lot of powerful women, and what price they pay for their
ambition
. But we understand why she’s demanding in the course of the film and
we come to sympathize with her pursuit of excellence. And the movie’s hopefully
surprisingly moving.”

Certainly abetting that dramatic fleshing out is Meryl Streep,
who stars as magazin-ista Miranda Priestly. “I don’t know what research she did,” admits
Frankel. “She was very careful not to let us peek behind the curtain of her
process
. We gave her a lot of information about magazine editors throughout the
years… but I honestly don’t know if she read any of that. I just know she had
an angle of attack on the character that I thought was brilliant.”

Equally important to the movie’s success, though, is its
other star, Anne Hathaway, for whom Frankel also has nothing but the highest
praise. “She really carries the film, she’s like a young Audrey Hepburn or
Julia Roberts,” he says. “She’s just remarkably vulnerable, engaging and funny,
and certainly her experience working with Meryl paralleled the story — which is
that of a young, ambitious girl who comes face to face with someone who might
be her idol, and she has to learn how to work with her and impress her, and
whether that path that her [supposed mentor] has chosen is the path that she
wants for herself.”

24 Hours on Craigslist

diabetic cat support group.

It isn’t necessarily deep on plumbing sociological insights, but where 24 Hours on Craigslist
really comes alive is in its voluminous slate of DVD extras — over four
hours of deleted scenes and bonus footage, including a 15-minute
making-of documentary on the marshalling of resources, a 16-minute look
at the staff of craigslist.org and, yes, an interview with Newark
himself. Still, will people find this entertaining? Will they pay money
to extend their “brand” experience and watch a movie about a web site?

Don’t bet against it. At the very least they’ll swap it on the site. C+ (Movie) A- (Disc)

Overnight Directors Talk Troy Duffy, The Boondock Saints

It was the movie deal that launched a thousand feverish nights of keyboard pecking, probably more.

In the spring of 1997, a beer slinger/bouncer named Troy Duffy hit the aspirant-filmmaker lotto when he sold his screenplay The Boondock Saints for $300,000 to Miramax’s Harvey Weinstein, who promptly attached Duffy to direct, agreed to let his band do the soundtrack, and, as a goodwill bonus, even offered to buy and throw in co-ownership of the Melrose Avenue bar where Duffy worked. If Schwab’s was the old symbol of Tinseltown discovery, this was a radical new overhaul for the post-Tarantino age of underclass, video store-fed auteurism.

Co-directors Tony Montana and Mark Brian Smith capture the rise, but mostly the fall, of Duffy in their up-close and highly personal documentary, Overnight. Call it Project Redlight — an inverted fairy tale and cautionary portrait of self-deception, whose horrific real-life comedy at times reaches Christopher Guest-like proportions of delusional absurdity.

Smith first caught Duffy performing an acoustic set one night at the now-razed J. Sloan’s. “I looked around the room and noticed that everyone had stopped their conversations,” he recalls. “And then, after the set, he was this center of attention; everyone was surrounding him, and he was being very outspoken, very charismatic, and was making people laugh. I said, ‘I’ve gotta meet this guy.'” Smith approached Duffy as a filmmaker, offered to do a music video with him, and was told to swing by Duffy’s apartment and “bring a six-pack of beer,” a standard entrance fee. Two weeks later, Smith was co-managing the band, partnering at Duffy’s suggestion with Montana, an ex-actor who had background as both a personal trainer and a professional wrestling manager.

In the halcyon days of their early friendship and the deal’s infancy, Duffy — a dynamic, Boston-born, thick-necked blowhard who communicates in the traditional alpha-male modes of drunken cajolery, passive-aggressive manipulation and grandiose bombast — was a rallying (if generally soused) ringleader. He even sent an e-mail to Montana’s parents praising their son and detailing the pair’s plans for shaking up the town. Overnight, however, captures the amplification of his bullying and egomania.

Chain-smoking Marlboro Lights in his standard uniform of surly, anti-establishment disaffection (a black T-shirt and overalls), the burly, invective-spewing Duffy rides herd in Overnight like a Mafioso Don on his wide-eyed, wallflower compatriots — a group of seven (including Montana and Smith) known without irony as The Syndicate — all the while hoarding credit and deflecting all blame and responsibility. “Troy was always shirtless and walking around with his hands in his pants,” recalls Montana. “He had an obsession with pornography. He was so overcompensating. He was a very strange individual.”

After Duffy reacted negatively to sundry early casting suggestions for The Boondock Saints — his deal stipulated a $15 million budget with Weinstein having approval over several of the leads, or $10 million with Duffy getting full casting approval — he agreed to take a meeting with Ewan McGregor. “Troy thought he could go out, meet with Ewan and get drunk, have a Scottish-Irish love affair, as he called it, and sign him lickety-split. That’s what he said,” explains Montana. “So he went to New York, and when he came back, things got very quiet. It turned out that they had a bad meeting, got into an argument over the death penalty, and Ewan wasn’t interested. And at that time, Ewan was really one of Miramax’s rising stars.” Additional dissent within the company — most peg then-president of production Meryl Poster as a fan of neither Duffy’s coarseness nor The Boondock Saints script — made for a slowly developing portrait of buyer’s remorse. “Harvey waited six months to put it into turnaround so it would be considered damaged goods and no one would pick it up, which is exactly what happened,” Montana says. “He slowly kept bankrolling a little bit of pre-production money, and then in November [1997] notified Troy’s agents that they weren’t making the picture.”

Framed within the context of the Oscar success of The English Patient and Weinstein’s ongoing Hollywood feting at the time, it’s not hard to view the entire affair as Miramax bleeding Duffy and the project dead before eventually dumping its corpse out of a speeding car. “In the Hollywood food chain, the distributors are at the top… and they can play games like that,” says Montana. “They don’t care how you feel, what you’re going through, whether you have money or you don’t.”

Montana and Smith would come to experience much of the same ugliness of the business, though initially it came in the form of condescension. “The funny thing is that I don’t think the higher-ups — the executives and the producers and the agents — really thought we’d ever end up with anything,” says Smith of their Overnight footage. “I think they thought we were doing this for Troy — we were a part of his posse, part of the entourage, and were living a pipe dream that … we had a product here. They appeased us, and they let us shoot, [but] they’d roll their eyes when we would walk in the room. It was very humiliating for us.”

The irony, of course, was that, as Duffy’s fortunes spiraled downward, Overnight‘s prospects actually seemed rosier. “Some of our closest friends and family asked if we were going to continue shooting, if we [still] had a story. And we knew what we had captured to that point, and we certainly knew what kind of character Troy was,” says Smith. “So [we decided to] follow him going through the hell of getting this film restructured and getting another record deal. That’s part of the story. We embraced the darkness and, toward the end of the film, it sort of being this Greek tragedy.”

The apex of strangeness was reached after a bizarre incident at the Palm Springs Film Festival — the immediate aftermath of which is captured in Overnight — in which a runaway car jumped the curb, barreled toward Duffy and his producer, and then sped away. It was then that Duffy, who Montana says always kept a shotgun and pistol around, took his guns, changed his phone number, moved out of his apartment, and went into semi-seclusion, claiming the Miramax Mafia — a phrase bandied about in publicity circles but meant literally here — was out to get him. Duffy suggested Montana and Smith take the same measures of precaution, even though he blamed their efforts to document the entire Boondock saga for causing his endangerment.

Montana and Smith last had contact with Duffy on June 30, 2000, when, Montana says, Duffy threatened him over the phone and demanded back the release he had signed. The filmmakers refused. “We decided to cut off all communication with Troy, go underground, and edit the film,” says Smith. “We had to lie to peopl
e we ran into out on the streets, tell them we shelved the project. Only our closest friends and family knew what we were doing.”

“We weren’t about to go down with the ship and just give up four years of our lives,” adds Montana. And for that, inveterate film-gossip hounds and others warm to a jaw-dropping look at a Hollywood train wreck, no matter what they may ultimately think of Duffy or his movie, are thankful.

Steve Pink on Accepted

As the co-writer of deeply loved comedic baubles Grosse Pointe Blank and High Fidelity, Steve Pink helped locate
the unique humor in both violently clashing cultures and slacker ethos, and he
says you’ll see that same idiosyncratic stamp of personality on Accepted
, a high school laffer that
serves as his directorial debut.

The film centers on Bartleby “B” Gaines (Justin Long), an
inveterate dreamer and graduating senior who’s on his way to amassing a perfect
collection of college rejection letters. (“We establish that he’s a very clever
guy,” says Pink, “but someone who applied it in ways that aren’t traditional —
like he didn’t write for the paper, but did his own ’zine.”) To avoid the
embarrassment of confessing to his parents that he didn’t get into school, B
drafts several of his oddball friends from similar, college-less circumstance
and creates his own university. Calling in some friendly favors, he has techie bud Sherman (Jonah Hill) craft a web site, secures some free space courtesy of a local
abandoned mental hospital and also convinces Sherman’s burnout uncle (Lewis
Black) to pose as the dean.

And voila! The South Harmon Institute of Technology
is born. B and his fellow South Harmon classmates soon realize they’ve done
their jobs too well, though, as dozens of other college rejects from out of
town start showing up for classes. Under the scornful eyes of the privileged
students and faculty from a neighboring college, B and his friends forge ahead
with maintaining a functioning but inherently fake university.

Pink says he was lured behind the camera by the film’s
unique potential (it was written by Mark Perez, Adam Cooper and Bill Collage),
and that he wanted to bring a touch of reality to the adolescent experience and
inject Accepted with some character
and energy from classic teen films of yore. Bartleby is somewhat similar to Ferris
Bueller in that he’s an inventive and otherwise directed kid with a healthy
disregard for institutions
— someone who wants to see what it’s like to live
outside the carefully prescribed borders of adolescent life.

In Ferris Bueller,
notes Pink, the joke is that he’s teetering on the edge of this “gateway evil,
when he just really wants to take off a day of school. In this movie it’s
similar: if you don’t go to college, you’re a lost soul. Your very happiness is
threatened by virtue of the fact that your success is put squarely in doubt
.
Will you be a successful, productive member of American society if you don’t
get a college degree, or one that’s prescribed by a mainstream institution? If
you have a massively entrepreneurial or artistic spirit or something, then yes
of course you will, but that’s not what kids are trained. Kids are tracked to
go to college to get a degree to get a good job so they can be happy. OK,
there’s nothing wrong with that value, but that can’t be the only value.”

Those expecting Advanced Level Buffoonery or an audit of
Comedic Archetypes 101, meanwhile, might be disappointed or at least surprised
by the film. “I didn’t want to do the ‘hair gel goofballs,’ you know? I tried
to find people who didn’t seem to fit anywhere else instead of construct
deliberately a bunch of freaks,” says Pink
. “I love movies where, even inside
the genre, you love all the people. The bad genre movies, to me, are the ones
where all the characters are in service of the gross-out joke or the wacky set
pieces that they engage in. I want kids to identify with people in the movie
and also have it be really, really funny.” If Accepted is accepted, Pink might emerge as the new John Hughes. Accepted is slated to open August 11, from Universal.
For a review of the film, meanwhile, click here.

An Advance Look at A Scanner Darkly

Set in suburban Orange County in a paranoid, dystopian
future where one-fifth of the American population has been hired to spy on everyone
else in the name of national security and the war on drugs, director Richard
Linklater’s A Scanner Darkly is a hallucinatory
and cautionary tale of drug use based on a novel by Philip K. Dick somewhat
informed, in turn, by his own experiences. Owing to the genre cachet of its
author
, there was considerable interest from Hollywood
studios in making the film.

Waking Life — it
came with all sorts of strings that voided the deal. “We never really thought
it about (as live action),” explains producer Tommy Pallotta
. “There were
certain design issues. …What does it mean for the characters and mirroring
their psychological universe? It just really didn’t come to us. It was just an
artistic vision we had that we felt matched the material. Very early on when we
tried to get funding for the project we were met with a lot of resistance,
because it’s an R-rated film and they didn’t feel that there was an audience
for it
. So they were interested in it, but only wanted us to do it live action.”

In the wake of the success of Sin City, however, prospects look quite
different for trippy live action-animated hybrids, and the more R-rated, the
better. Still, A Scanner Darkly is
far from an easy sell. A paranoid journey into the absurd — with all its
attendant double crosses, head feints and slurry identities
— Pallotta
describes it as an independent-minded animated film with adult themes. “To me
it’s science fiction,” he says, “but does it really fit what people associate
with that genre? There are no spaceships. To me the interesting things about sci-fi
are the philosophical and existential questions about what does it mean to be
human, the ontological questions (about) the nature of reality.”

“Sci-fi as a genre has a certain set of expectations in movies,”
Pallotta continues. “I think there’s a cynical notion on the moviemaking side
that people have to see a chase scene. But teenagers are really open-minded, they’re
into seeing different movies from different countries and people are so much
more sophisticated now — they want something new, something they haven’t seen
before. So I have faith that the audience wants that as well.”

That the $8 million A
Scanner Darkly
is a labor of love is undeniable. All the actors (including Keanu Reeves, Woody Harrelson and Winona Ryder, above) accepted
scale — a necessity, really, given that they worked for a month or less while
most of the film’s animators toiled for around a year. The estate of Philip Dick
also cut their fee significantly after discussions with Linklater and his
production staff. How that love is embraced by audiences — darkly or brightly — remains to
be seen
. For a review of the film, click here.

Bill & Ted’s Excellent Adventure

The archive-stuffing party train simply does not stop. To wit, this review of Bill & Ted’s Excellent Adventure, originally published upon its 2004 DVD release:

Doing dumb is easy, but doing dumb well is hard. Plenty of
movies try and, well, for lack of a forceful enough clinical term, suck
. This
film isn’t one of them. A precursor to the even greater mainstream success of
dim-bulb and/or friends-in-low-places teen flicks like Wayne’s World, Bill
& Ted’s Excellent Adventure
and its 1991 sequel, Bill & Ted’s Bogus
Journey
, updated the Jeff Spicoli image in a fresh and influential way.

Written
by Chris Matheson and Ed Solomon and directed with style and economy by Stephen
Herek
, the movie finds two vacant-eyed San Dimas, Calif. seniors (Alex Winter
and Keanu Reeves) more interested in their rock band (Wyld Stallions) than
history class. (Question: “Who is Joan of Arc?” Reeves’ thoughtful, reasoned
response: “Noah’s wife?”) Consequently, of course, they’re flunking. But possible
redemption arrives in the form of Rufus (George Carlin), a guardian angel from
the future who proffers the pair a time-travelling phone booth to go back in
time and learn history from those who made it, including Napoleon, Socrates,
Gengis Khan and Abe Lincoln. Surprisingly, the film holds up pretty well;
probably the worst thing you can say about the movie is that it no doubt
inspired some dunderheaded studio exec to greenlight all of Pauly Shore’s
flicks
.

DVD special features on this anamorphic widescreen release include only the theatrical trailer, which is kind of
a bummer since you get the feeling that there are some fun extras lurking out
there, not to mention an interesting audio commentary track or two. Still, Bill &
Ted’s Excellent Adventure
stands as a compelling piece of prima facie evidence
that like movies can make a difference: how else do you think SAT words like
“heinous” and “bogus” entered the teen lexicon? B+ (Movie) D (Disc)