For a piece in today’s Calendar section about actresses and nudity in Oscar-winning roles, the Los Angeles Times‘ Rachel Abramowitz talks to Marisa Tomei about her on-screen nudity in both Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead and The Wrestler, and the well-toned actress pooh-poohs talk about a new direction for her career: “I happened to get offered The Wrestler after I did that movie,” she says. “It’s not like I’m in my nude phase now.”
Standard stuff that, somewhat refreshingly, mostly rises above knee-jerk claims of sexism, except for the factually incorrect assertion that, “Every day, actresses such as Jessica Alba, Scarlett Johansson and Eliza Dushku seem to be swearing off nudity like teenagers joining abstinence clubs.” Dushku in fact appears briefly nude in The Alphabet Killer, a recent DVD release.
All posts by Brent
Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa
.
Warner Bros. Denies Sherlock Holmes Reshoot Rumors
British tabloid The Sun reported yesterday that filmmaker Guy Ritchie had been told to reshoot five weeks’ worth of footage after studio bosses were unhappy with an early cut of Sherlock Holmes, starring Robert Downey, Jr., Jude Law, Rachel McAdams, Mark Strong, Kelly Reilly and Eddie Marsan. But in a statement last night, The Guardian reports, Warner Bros. said executives had not yet seen the movie, which was “still early in the production process.”
Thursday (Non-Sausage) Linkage: U2, David Lynch
Two great behind-the-scenes reads on U2’s forthcoming album, No Line on the Horizon, from Neil McCormick and Sean O’Hagan, just because. And also: David Lynch likes gold, domes and diamonds.
Egyptian Hosts Production Design Nominees Panel
On Saturday, February 21, at 2:30 p.m., the day before the Oscars, this year’s Academy Award nominated production designers and set decorators will participate in a special panel at the Egyptian Theatre in Hollywood, discussing their nominated films and what it took to design them.
The Art Directors Guild and the Set Decorators Society of America, in association with the American Cinematheque, are presenting this panel, which will be preceded by excerpts of each nominated film. ADG President Tom Walsh will moderate the discussion with production designer James Murakami and set decorator Gary Fettis, of Changeling; production designer Donald Graham Burt and set decorator Victor Zolfo, of The Curious Case of Benjamin Button; production designer Nathan Crowley and set decorator Peter Lando, of The Dark Knight; production designer Michael Carlin and set decorator Rebecca Alleyway, of The Duchess; and production designer Kristi Zea and set decorator Debra Schutt, of Revolutionary Road.
Admission is free, and tickets are available on the day of the panel discussion at the box office only; there will be no online ticketing. Also of note, a free panel discussion with all of the Oscar nominees for Best Film Editing will be presented by American Cinema Editors at 10 a.m. on February 21. For more information on either event, click here.
Fifty Filmmakers Drops Next Week
Fellow journalist Michael Dequina, whom I know and respect, grabs collaborator status on a new compilation book of interviews, Fifty Filmmakers: Conversations With Directors from Roger Avary to Steven Zaillian, with primary author Andrew J. Rausch. It’s out next week, and well worth a read. To pre-order via Amazon, click here.
Happy Birthday, Cybill Shepherd

It’s a happy birthday to Cybill Shepherd, who turns 59 today. In addition to frequently having her name misspelled in about a dozen different combinations, Shepherd is one of those dames of a certain age — like Elizabeth Taylor, and probably eventually Jennifer Lopez — who everyone talks about, whenever their name comes up, as having been sooo beautiful, perhaps as a way to mitigate discussion about general nuttiness or diva-ish behavior. For Shepherd, the big demarcator is her topless turn as Jacy Farrow in 1971’s The Last Picture Show, above. She also, of course, has the (well earned) reputation of being a very vocal pain-in-the-ass; in fact, I’ve interviewed a former costar who only smiled tightly when asked about her, and then nodded wryly when asked if that could be interpreted as being indicative of their feelings about her. Still, one has to give it up for Moonlight,* which really sang in those first two seasons. That’s the Shepherd I prefer to remember, and celebrate.
* EDIT: Moonlighting! Man. I blame the Hennessy…
High School Musical 3: Senior Year
Testing the maxim that happiness can’t be contrived, High School Musical 3: Senior Year
sets off a joy bomb, and attempts to charm tween-leaning audiences
through an explosion of primary colors, bright production design and
sheer, indefatigable force of will. The fact that the first film in the Disney
Channel’s huge hit TV movie series to receive a proper theatrical release is bluntly effective in its staged
cathartic moments but generally powered by a puttering dramatic engine didn’t seem to impair the
relentlessly chipper toe-tapper’s box office haul — the film grossed $250 million, with an impressive 64 percent of that total coming overseas.

The plot, as if you either didn’t already know, or simply didn’t care? Against the spring backdrop of their senior year, a half dozen students
at New Mexico’s Eastern High try to juggle competing interests for
their time and attention, and figure out the paths for their respective
futures. Fresh off winning their second state basketball championship,
school hunk and big-man-on-campus Troy (Zac Efron) seems destined to
follow in his father’s footsteps to the local university, by accepting
a basketball scholarship alongside his best friend Chad (Corbin Bleu).
Giving Troy pause, though, is the fact that his girlfriend Gabriella
(Vanessa Hudgens) is headed out-of-state to Stanford. As they
prepare for one last school musical, eagerly anticipated by the
self-involved Sharpay (Ashley Tisdale) and her more open-hearted twin
brother Ryan (Lucas Grabeel), the group’s drama teacher adds a wrinkle
to events by announcing that recruiters from Juilliard, the prestigious
performing arts academy, will be on hand to observe the award one
scholarship to a student at yet to be determined.
Returning
series director Kenny Ortega creates an immaculately presented fashion
showcase, and places a heavy emphasis on theatrical gesticulation that
makes High School Musical 3 seem ever solicitous of its
audience’s feelings, in ways perhaps contrived but no less forceful and
effective. A couple musical numbers are shot in seemingly hurried
fashion, with tight alternating close-ups, but the up-tempo songs generally work, even when trading in boys-are-back clichés, and for the most part
there’s a nice fleshing-out consistent with the bump in production
value from the previous made-for-television movies.
Somewhat
unfortunately, all the conflict here is of the paint-by-numbers variety,
even for teen dramas. Sharpay’s conniving and antagonism is rather
blithely dismissed, never carrying over to later scenes. Similarly,
because it’s not evidenced by actual friction in their relationship,
the emotional drift between Gabriella and Troy as they prepare for
different post-high school paths never seems like more than a set-up for song. Troy, too, often seems an incidental bystander in his own
unfolding future, the one exception to this being “My Own Dream,” which
is the movie’s requisite Footloose-style, solo freak-out
number, complete with shifting floor and ceiling dance bits to simulate
angsty teen disorientation and confusion. That said, there’s not
much in the film’s look or execution to dissuade embrace by its core
audience; the movie’s production design and overall packaging are slick, and the
performances are sunny and engaging.
Housed in a regular plastic Amaray case in turn stored in a glossy cardboard slipcover, High School Musical 3: Senior Year comes presented in 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen, with a Dolby digital 5.1 surround sound audio track anchoring the aural presentation. The video transfer is solid, with crisp, bright colors, consistent blacks and no problems with artifacting or edge enhancement. The two-disc DVD showcases the extended version of the film, plus a smattering of not-very-lengthy supplemental features that exhibit an emphasis on quantity over quality. Hug-laden, EPK-style interviews with the cast total around six minutes, as do a collection of deleted scenes. There’s also a squeaky-clean (i.e., curse-free), three-minute blooper reel, which offers only marginal amusement. The other featurettes, the seven-minute “Night of Nights” and the two-and-a-half-minute “It’s All in the Dress,” spotlight the film’s big prom scene blowout musical number and all the prom costumes, respectively, and aren’t necessarily heavy on replay value. Granted, this entire series isn’t perhaps worthy of much deep psychological examination, but it would’ve actually been interesting to get a studio/executive perspective of what helped launch and shape High School Musical, and its sequels. Perhaps of most special note for extroverted tween audiences is the
disc’s sing-along feature, which lets viewers jump to a specific song or play the entire movie in this mode, with karaoke-style lyrics along the
bottom of the screen to assist in belting out tunes with the movie’s
characters. Finally, in addition to the theatrical trailer, there’s also a “DisneyFile” digital copy of the movie. To purchase the extended edition DVD via Amazon, click here. B- (Movie) B- (Disc)
Gary Lucchesi Assays Vanity Producer Creds, Sparking Thought
I’ve talked before about how runaway producer credits, aka vanity credits, are the new STD of the movie industry (most notably here, and here as well). Understandably, many producers aren’t exactly thrilled to chat about the subject, lest they be seen as taking shots across the bow at their own. Lakeshore Entertainment honcho Gary Lucchesi isn’t much different, but his take on the matter did offer up an interesting comparison that I hadn’t previously pondered. To wit:
“I’m on the board of directors for the producer’s guild so it is an
issue,” Lucchesi admits. “It’s become more profound now because it takes so much more to
get a film made. Twenty years ago, if a studio made Henry Poole, it
would be [with] a producer who’d have an overall deal with the studio. He’d
bring the project in, and if an executive liked it, they’d make the
movie. And there would be one producer or perhaps a team, not a
plethora of producers. Nowadays, on a movie like this, we brought it to
Lakeshore, where Tom [Rosenberg] and I take a producer credit. And then there were other
people — Tom Lassally was (director Mark Pellington)’s manager, who actually introduced the material to Mark, so he had a credit. And then Gary Gilbert brought in some
money, so he got a credit. Most of the executive producers are money
people, and if you have to cobble a movie together you all of a sudden
have seven or eight credits. So I get it, I understand it, I don’t like
people that didn’t contribute getting credits, but on the other
hand we’re a little bit like Broadway now — there are angels, and they
throw money at it, and if the movie gets made it’s good for everybody.
I know what my contribution is, and I think that at the end of the day
we all know who the actors are… I get the problem, but it’s because
our business is so much harder now.”
Is it really harder, though? More movies are made than ever before, it’s just that studios are looking to let other people spend the bulk of that money, and plug films into their distribution pipeline, right? So outside of its tentpole releases — big summer fare, genre offerings and a handful of awards-bait contenders — they don’t really care what names are on posters and press kits. If it’s actually markedly more difficult to get movies made these days, wouldn’t honest-to-God hands-on producers want to be more proactive about protecting their credit? “Fine line” and all, I get it. But no one gets to scratch a seven-figure check (or bundle the same) and just call themselves a special effects coordinator, do they? So where’s the outrage, or even leadership on this issue? Just throwing this out there…
Seth Green Talks Voiceover Work, Family Guy
More random, digital-age brush-clearing, this time in the form of Seth Green‘s thoughts on voiceover work in general and Family Guy specifically. “I put the same type of intent and emotion behind anything I’m performing, whether it’s comedy or drama, or on-camera or voiceover,” says Green. “I find that the sincerity of performance is recognizable especially in voiceover, where you really only have your voice to rely on. So the more truthful I can be, the potentially funnier it will be.”
“I have no idea what’s going on Family Guy, though, I don’t read the scripts,” he continues. “This is the greatest job I’ve ever had, simply because I don’t have to read the material in advance. I can go into the booth, with (Seth) McFarlane on the other side of the glass, and say, ‘What’s going on here?’ And then I get to watch the show as a fan, and have no idea what’s happening. It’s just so funny to watch that way. Family Guy is a job that I thank God for all the time. I can’t believe how lucky I am, because I actually love that show. When I first read the pilot script I hoped and wished that I could get that job, because it was something that I wanted to be a part of.”
Jonathan Levine Talks Pharmaceuticals, Refreshingly

I’m doing some file brush-up and vacuuming — the electronic age, records-sweep equivalent of brush-clearing, which would warm Dubya’s heart, I’m sure — and I came across this pulled tidbit from an interview last summer with Jonathan Levine, writer-director of The Wackness, in which he talks about prescription medications like anti-anxiety and anti-depression drugs. I didn’t run it at the time because it came during a digressive sidebar pocket which dipped into some (shared) state-of-the-world bewilderment, but it merits another look for a very important and intriguing reason. Set in 1994, and centering around an unlikely friendship between a teenage dope dealer and one of his clients, a therapist, the film doesn’t specifically take an anti-psychotropic drug stance, but from talking to Levine it’s clear he believes they’re over-prescribed. His comments:
“Well, it’s something that we definitely tackle. The early ’90s were a time when pharmaceuticals were becoming more and more a part of psychiatry, you know? And I think that Dr. Squires resists giving Luke medication, but at the same time at the end of the movie he’s on medication himself, and to me this was a question that needed to be asked, and what we really tried to do was resist any sort of judgment. You have one person who it isn’t right for, and one person who it is right for, but I think certainly it begs the question who needs this, and are people getting this who don’t need it? Squires asks Luke if he wants to handle his problems the way Rudy Guiliani handles the city, and sweep everything away, and that to me is allegorical for what anti-depressants do. But the flip side of that is that I see a movie like Garden State, a movie that I love, where a guy quits doing his medication at the beginning of the movie, and it’s this whole revelation for him. And look, a lot of my friends are on this stuff, and I have been on stuff like this as well — and that doesn’t ring true to me at all. So I just think that we wanted to resist pat answers, because I don’t know where I stand on that question. I’m just examining something and don’t have an answer. And sometimes I think that’s what movies need to do.”
The most interesting thing here for me is Levine’s admission to personal experience with these types of prescription medication, which is a heartening thing. For so many folks there’s still a stigma about anti-anxiety or ADHD drugs, but a closeted discussion is the most dangerous debate and does the public the most ongoing disservice, as I think Heath Ledger‘s tragic death proves. If more people around were aware of… not just some vague, amorphous “struggles,” but Ledger’s actual diagnoses, and medications, does anyone doubt that wouldn’t have been over-prescribed (by different doctors, no less) in the manner that he was? Levine’s right, the truth — both externalized, and within ourselves — is so often grey, and what works for one person might likely not for someone else, even a family member. We’re just scratching the surface of biogenetic diagnosis. But painting in broad brushstrokes, or refusing to acknowledge — publically, or just to loved ones — drug-treated conditions does no one any service, and should be consigned to the past.
Frozen River
Written and directed by Courtney Hunt, Frozen River could — if perhaps reset in Spain and helmed by Pedro Almodovar — just as easily be titled Women on the Edge, for it’s a movie all about the struggle of blue-collar, dirty-fingernailed retail moms for whom life doesn’t quite work, and cigarettes are a luxurious escape. A slice of socioeconomically depressed cinema very loosely in the vein of George Washington or Come Early Morning, Hunt’s feature debut is anchored by Best Actress Oscar nominee Melissa Leo’s fiercely prideful, stirring performance, which recommends the title for fans of smart, quiet acting.

Life in Massena, New York, a small border town of 13,000 along on the northern edge of St. Lawrence County, is as harsh and barren as the frigid landscape. In this bleak terrain, two hardened single mothers trying to make a life for their children cross paths in unlikely fashion. Lila (Misty Upham) is a widowed Mohawk whose mother-in-law “stole” her newborn son a year ago. Ray (Leo) is the mother of two boys, 15-year-old T.J. (Charlie McDermott) and little Ricky (James Reilly), whose unreliable, come-and-go, gambling-addicted husband just disappeared with the $1,500 down payment for their new double-wide trailer home. Faced with little opportunity to make ends meet, Ray and Lila embark on an illegal venture transporting immigrants into the U.S. across an iced-over river on Native American reservation territory. With the money for the completion/delivery payment within Ray’s grasp, the women are determined to make one last run. When circumstances spiral out of control, the two women must make life or death decisions based on their love for their children and quasi-friendship.
Hunt fetishizes the worried, working woman’s creases of Leo’s face, and in this regard (smartly? by chance?) lets Leo do a lot of the film’s emotional heavy lifting. Much of the rest of Frozen River is all surface drama, though, which is problematic both because of Upham’s limited professional resumé and the fact that Hunt has trouble crafting dialogue that doesn’t come across like a hammer on a nail. (“I don’t usually work with whites,” says Lila at one point, then, “They won’t stop you — you’re white.” Later, a character literally searches for money in the couch cushions, something I don’t believe I’ve done since I was seven, no matter how desperate to pay the rent.) The inherent dramatic conflict here is all telegraphed, in other words. Some nonverbalized details work much better (Ray’s oldest son spreading burnt popcorn to mask the smell of an accident, for instance), and the movie is both nicely photographed and has an additional pinch of timeliness due to the foreclosure crisis sweeping the nation. But mostly Frozen River, a sort of pencil sketch character flick, runs out of natural mesmeric pull, and coasts on the strength of its steely star — a career supporting actress now reborn as a leading lady.
Housed in a regular plastic Amaray case, Frozen River comes presented in 1.78:1 widescreen, with an English language Dolby digital 5.1 audio track and optional French subtitles. Somewhat dishearteningly, the sole supplemental bonus feature is an audio commentary track with Hunt and producer Heather Rae. The women speak glowingly of their collaborators, and talk some about the inspiration for the film (some non-fiction articles and research Hunt did), but the track is punctuated by long silences, and would have benefited from a moderator’s presence to help coax out not just more production anecdotes but a grander discussion of the movie’s thematic social content. To purchase the DVD via Amazon, click here. C+ (Movie) C- (Disc)
New CityBeat Runs Same Single Review Two Weeks in a Row
Meant to post this last week, but what does the future of film coverage in Los Angeles look like? Kind of depressing, but also laughably terrible, truth be told. Since they let film editor and chief critic Andy Klein go last month, CityBeat has, as I understand it, been picking up what little film stuff they’ve run from out-of-town sources (i.e., writers on other papers they own, in Seattle and elsewhere). This has led to some strange circumstances — including the reviewing of things that
have shuttered in L.A., and/or already been reviewed, as well as a complete lack of any updated film material online for several weeks. The new nadir? For the week of
February 6, CityBeat ran a single capsule review of the Weinstein Company’s Fanboys in its print edition. Then, for the week of February 13, they ran… the very same
review of Fanboys. Yikes. I don’t know if this is a case of printer error (very tough to believe, given updated layout), or some cheap, shrugging stop-gap trick that the powers-that-be thought they could slip by, but I can tell you from experience that that sort of thing is not only a white flag of surrender to any reader with half a brain, but will be noticed by movie studios and ad buyers as well.
Matteo Garrone Talks Gomorrah, Italy’s War on the Camorra
It didn’t make the final cut for the Best Foreign Language Film Oscar
nominations, but Matteo Garrone’s Gomorrah, the Grand Prix winner at
the Cannes Film Festival last year, drew favorable comparisons to
plenty of trailblazing American cinema for its Altman-esque juggling of
disparate, thematically intertwined storylines. A gritty ensemble drama about the tidal pull of
despair and entrapment that Italian organized crime wreaks, the movie
interweaves a half dozen sprawling, bird’s-eye story strands; its characters include a family
involved in shady waste management dealings, a haute couture tailor who
accepts under-the-table work from cut-rate Chinese competitors, and two
stray-dog teens (below) with unruly criminal impulses but no order to their
schemes. I spoke with Garrone before the final Oscar selections,
and he talked about Gomorrah‘s theatrical success in his homeland, the state of the
Italian government’s war on the mafia, and what Oliver Stone thought about his film. The interview is excerpted below.

Brent Simon: Was Roberto Saviano’s novel something you were familiar with prior to signing on to the movie?
Matteo Garrone: I started to work on this project before it became a bestseller. It had just been published two weeks prior when producer Domenico Procacci got the rights. So I talked to Roberto about the idea of making a movie, and at that time he was under [police] protection. But I never had any hesitation to make this movie, because I thought it was a very important book and also a great opportunity for me as a filmmaker.
BS: Was the actual production of the film dangerous?
MG: Yes, we changed the title of the movie when we were shooting, but we discovered that people love cinema so much that they were happy anyway to work on an artistic project. Fortunately, we found great collaboration from the people that live in that territory, where we shot. We found the help of the people valuable because we wanted to tell a story about the Camorra (or mafia) from the inside, from the bottom up, from the point-of-view of people involved in these conflicts every day, and just trying to survive. We didn’t want to make a movie just against Camorra, or to show how bad things are. It’s a movie about Camorra more than just against them.
BS: How long was the shoot?
MG: Three months, with three months of preparation. So I spent about six months living in that area, and for me it was very surprising to find out that in Italy in 2008 there was a territory in the middle of a war. But you also talk with people who are happy to live like that, and you can meet people who you feel are really not aware about their condition, because if you grow up there, you know no different.
BS: The film has six credited screenwriters, which is an awful lot. What was that collaboration like?
MG: We gathered and wrote in Rome, but there was rewriting. Even after editing, we wrote some more scenes and [went] back to shoot again. It was a long process. Every writer handled a specific part of the screenplay. Saviano came, but he started to have more and more problems with the Camorra, so he started to come more rarely, and with police protection. We worked for four months on the script, and the writers came to the set during shooting to give their advice. My way of working is that everyone helps one another — the editor helps the screenwriter, and the screenwriter helps the set designer, you know? We are all friends.
BS: You’ve said that you filmed Gomorrah in a very straightforward fashion to reproduce the feelings that you were having while shooting. Is that approach different than your other movies?
MG: In this case the material was so strong that it was very important not to make any comment on it, because there’s the risk of banalizing what you’re working on. It was important and advisable to be very simple. I come from painting, so I’m a very visual director — there is always composition of the frame. But sometimes I shoot like something was happening just in the moment, like reportage in a war. We wanted to give this idea to the audience — to [put them] there, on the inside.
BS: So had you shot any of your other films in this manner?
MG: Not in this way. There is always a relation with documentary, but in a different way. For me it’s always very important to go [on location], and talk with people, know the detail of every part of the reality that I’m talking about. Then I try to make an interpretation of that reality — not an imitation. Those are very different. I’m not interested in the latter.
BS: I’ve seen a number of documentaries on the Camorra, but I wasn’t aware of the toxic dumping, and how big an issue that is, how long it’s been going on. Is that matter well known and reported on in Italy?
MG: To be honest, I didn’t know about it, and that’s why we decided to develop those characters and that story, and also to talk about the environment. I went to the real territory and saw the place where they used to dump this toxic waste… it’s amazing. Cancer there is 20 percent higher, and it’s incredible because the first people who died are the ones that weren’t making enough money through agriculture, so they rented the area to make more money.
BS: Marco and Zero, the two young boys in the film, have a preoccupation with Scarface —
MG: (interrupting, smiling broadly) Well, that’s an idea to talk about the confusion between reality and fiction. They are like Don Quixote and Sancho Panza in a modern way, you know? But it could be Scarface, it could be anything.
BS: That’s interesting, because Scarface seems to have a pan-cultural appeal, as well as a lot of currency in the African-American hip hop culture…
MG: That is interesting. Actually, yesterday evening there was a screening with (Scarface screenwriter) Oliver Stone there, and I wished I could have asked him about that. All what makes me curious.
BS: What was his reaction to Gomorrah?
MG: He said liked it a lot.
BS: The film has set box office records in Italy. Was that surprising to you, given the subject matter?
MG: Well, we expected success, because the book was very popular, but we couldn’t expect such big success because the movie is quite different, and the structure mixes many stories. There isn’t a hero that fights against the bad people. It’s a gangster movie, but a gangster movie without a character at the top — there’s no [evil] boss. Instead of the emperor, it’s more like we see all the slaves. And when it came out in Italy it came out with subtitles, because the dialect was so strict that no one could understand. Only people from that region, and maybe the center of Naples, could understand. That was another [commercial] risk, but fortunately the audience [embraced] discovering such reality, without any filter.
BS: The end of the film makes mention of the mob’s 200,000 supporters, and you also mentioned Roberto Saviano needing police protection, so what does the modern war on the Camorra look like?
MG: Well, the book and the movie are complementary, and together became explosive, because now all the world knows about the Camorra — the government couldn’t ignore that, they had to do something. They declared war against Camorra and brought the army into Naples. That’s the situation. For sure, it’s good, but the army is not enough if you don’t start to solve the problem from inside. It’s important to understand why it’s so strong, and why people don’t trust in governmental institutions, which is the real problem.
Transformers 2 Teaser Doesn’t Show Shia LaBeouf Whacking It
The teaser trailer for Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, if you need it. Man… can’t wait for the five-minute comedy bit where Shia LaBeouf’s parents still think he’s masturbating, despite presence of giant robots.
Why Is Right America Feeling Wronged?
From The 213, Telly Davidson’s take on Right America: Feeling Wronged, Alexandra Pelosi’s new HBO documentary about “those for whom the economy hasn’t worked since Ford and Carter,” and thus fear that guy, now president, with the funny name, and love the give-’em-hell-facts-be-damned moxie of that personable Sarah Palin. The hour-long doc debuts tonight, and then enjoys rebroadcasts on February 19, 22 and 25, as well as March 7 and 10.
Jason Statham Jumpstarts Nipples in Crank 2 Trailer
The red band trailer for Crank 2: High Voltage, starring Jason Statham, is an awesome thing — a phantasmagoric swirl of profanity, scantily clad women, editorial choices that would make Michael Bay proud, and even a mullet-sporting Corey Haim. It makes great, smart use of The Crystal Method’s “The Name of the Game” (also used to slick, head-bobbing effect in Tropic Thunder), and also reveals that those nipple-taped photographs of Amy Smart that leaked last summer weren’t purely illicit candid shots… they’re in the movie! Oh, plus it ends with B-roll footage. Good times. Over-the-top, as it should be. Well played, Lionsgate…
Friday the 13th: Deluxe Edition DVDs
.
Red Mist
Straight-up horror gets intermingled with the supernatural in Red Mist, a stylishly lensed straight-to-video shocker that delivers some decently imaginative thrill-kills. No great points for narrative invention or depth of performance, but hardcore genre fans will more or less be able to get on board with this flick.

Set at Forthaven Hospital, a teaching institution where the hard-partying medical interns are apparently boning up on their self-obsessed navel-gaving, indiscriminate sexual canoodling and general indifference so that they might graduate to glossier, Grey’s Anatomy-type shenanigans, Red Mist takes as its quietly dangerous protagonist a loner janitor, Kenneth (Andrew Lee Potts), whose life at the hospital consists of a series of endless torments from said ambitious, snooty medical students. When their latest stunt goes too far, Kenneth ends up in a coma, and practically brain dead.
Determined to save his life, guilt-ridden Catherine (Arielle Kebbel, most recently of The Uninvited) administers a powerful and
untested cocktail of drugs to the coma victim. Rather than cure Kenneth,
however, it triggers a powerful out-of-body experience and enables him to temporarily inhabit other people’s bodies and, through them,
take revenge on those responsible for his vegetative state. (At this point, cue R.E.M.’s “What’s the Frequency, Kenneth?” for alternate soundtrack play-along-at-home amusement.) As her colleagues are savagely picked off in one-by-one fashion, Catherine soon
realizes that what started as a medical miracle has now transformed into a
medical monstrosity. She’s forced to confront a comatose killer who
moves in and out of bodies at will, getting ever closer to her as his
supernatural powers increase.
Penned by Spencer Wright and directed by Paddy Breathnach (Blow Dry, I Went Down), Red Mist is a moderately engaging horror flick that scores points in the execution of its gruesome dispatches. The body-swap and foreign-control element gives the movie most of its dramatic juice — as in Mirrors, Kenneth can essentially force people to harm themselves — even if the actual set-up of said conceit is a bit eye-rollingly familiar, and over-the-top. (Could self-centered students fast-tracked for success really be bothered to engage in high school-level bullying in the first place?) Breathnach is forced by the story to set his proceedings in some relatively drab locations, but he injects energy and color where he can, with strobe effects and other devices. General audiences may more or less yawn, but hardcore genre fans will dig some of the blood-letting on display here.
Housed in a regular Amray plastic case in turn stored in a cardboard slipcover with the above, nicely impressionistic cover art, Red Mist comes to DVD via Anchor Bay, and is presented in 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen, with solid black levels and a barely detectable trace of edge compression in solid colors. An English language 5.1 Dolby surround sound audio track anchors the aural presentation, and there are also optional English subtitles for the deaf and hearing impaired. The DVD’s special features consist of three different featurettes. The first is an extended interview with Kebbel, who’s certainly easy on the eyes, but offers no great insights about her character or the material. There’s also a 21-minute making-of featurette, rife with behind-the-scenes and on-set footage, that comes across as a bit muddled; it’s partly a music video-type tone piece, meant to broadly convey the impression of actually shooting the movie, and partly a collection of EPK-style chats with various on-screen and off-screen players. A four-minute chat with other cast members on location in Northern Ireland and previews for other Anchor Bay releases round out this affair. To purchase the DVD via Amazon, click here. C+ (Movie) B- (Disc)
Brad Pitt Makes Clear His Feelings About Nazi Scalps
The trailer for Inglourious Basterds, Quentin Tarantino’s Nazi-scalping, band-of-brutal-brothers World War II epic, is of course now online, after having (partially?) debuted on Entertainment Tonight or Access Hollywood or one of those other shows earlier this week. And it’s a fairly kick-ass thing, I have to say, just operating on a gut-level reaction.

Without an overload of snarkiness, it clearly and effectively conveys the over-the-top tone, in other words — this ain’t your father’s World War II movie. Brad Pitt‘s accent is sort of beautifully ludicrous, and the music, with its slight twinge of industrial grind, works well. Eli Roth‘s smirk after Pitt’s monologue about wanton cruelty, might make the whole trailer, though. Confounding young spelling bee participants, Inglourious Basterds releases August 21, domestically from the Weinstein Company and internationally from Universal Pictures.
Confessions of a Shopaholic
Fashion magnate Coco Chanel once declared that luxury is the opposite of vulgarity, but in the current Stateside economic climate such conspicuous consumption can seem somewhat tacky, or even a sign of mental psychosis, especially when a character opines, “No man will ever treat you as well as a store.” The film adaptation of Confessions of a Shopaholic, a bright, shiny bauble that serves as the leading lady debut of Isla Fisher, attempts to mitigate that conflict largely through a voluble charm offensive. But the end result is a manic and not entirely convincing romantic comedy in which there is no discernible difference between its characters drunk or sober.

Based on a series of best-selling books by Sophie Kinsella, the film stars Fisher as Rebecca Bloomwood, a spunky New York journalist with an unchecked addiction for expensive brand-name fashions and accoutrements. Drowning in more than $16,000 of credit card debt, Rebecca gets suddenly downsized, but ends up lucking her way into a gig at a financial magazine, where she charms the publication’s earnest British editor, Luke Brandon (Hugh Dancy), and becomes an overnight sensation with a common sense money column penned under the anonymous moniker “The Girl in the Green Scarf.” Against the backdrop of an array of recognizable supporting players, Rebecca expends a lot of energy trying to keep secret both her personal debt and general lack of knowledge of the world of finance. Eventually, though, the lies and games catch up with her.
Australian-born director P.J. Hogan (Muriel’s Wedding) brings some of his trademark energy to the edges of scenes, most notably in interplay with Rebecca’s proletarian parents (John Goodman and Joan Cusack) and other secondary players. But the overall tone is one of pitched mania; the entire movie feels hopped up on cough syrup. There seem to be no honest consequences to actions. If the well-worn direction of the plot generally fails her, certainly no shadow falls on Fisher. She proved herself a comedic force in Wedding Crashers and Definitely, Maybe, and here gets to showcase screwball line readings, a delightfully sunny persona and a deft touch with some physical slapstick. For the full, original review, from Screen International, click here. (Walt Disney, 104 minutes, PG)
Josh Brolin, Anthony Hopkins Topline Woody Allen’s New Film
Woody Allen has cast Josh Brolin and Anthony Hopkins in his latest film, it was announced today. Another return to Europe for Allen, the new, untitled film shoots in London this summer and re-teams the director with financer Mediapro, the Spain-based company which also funded Vicky Cristina Barcelona. Additional cast members are expected to be announced shortly. Sony Pictures Classics recently acquired Allen’s next completed film, Whatever Works, which will release theatrically June 23.
James Gray Pens First Person Piece About Joaquin Phoenix
Over on Huffington Post, filmmaker James Gray has an interesting first person piece about Joaquin Phoenix’s decision to retire from acting, a piece which includes some interesting details about their working relationship over the course of three movies. For my interview with Gray, meanwhile, click here; for an interview with Phoenix, click here.
Groundhog Day’s Ned Ryerson Gets Extra Run on Blu-ray
No, Bill Murray fans aren’t experiencing deja vu — 1993’s Groundhog Day has come to home video before. Exclusive to its recent Blu-ray debut, however, is a special intermittent picture-in-picture bonus track narrated by Stephen Tobolowsky, who memorably plays Ned Ryerson, an enthusiastically deranged insurance salesman and old high school classmate of Murray’s sardonic, stuck-in-a-time-loop weatherman. The good-natured, 57-year-old character actor pops up in character throughout the film and narrates “weatherman style,” offering up trivia tidbits and quizzing viewers on their own knowledge of the film. Tobolowsky didn’t need much prodding on the reminiscences, either, as he shares in this interview tidbit from H Magazine. Groundhog Day on Blu-ray is currently available via Sony Pictures Home Entertainment for a SRP of $28.95.
Zodiac (Blu-ray)
In the shadows of this year’s impending Oscar ceremony, where his The Curious Case of Benjamin Button stands tall, if somewhat quietly on the buzz-meter, with 13 nominations, the most of any film, director David Fincher’s grossly underrated previous effort behind the camera, Zodiac, arrives to Blu-ray.
A dense but hypnotic and starkly involving account of the unsolved murders in California that spanned the late 1960s and 1970s. Part brooding investigative ensemble, part journalistic procedural in the vein of All The President’s Men, the film is a strikingly well stitched together vivisection of crime and obsession, marked by a painstaking, novelistic richness that showcases the heavy existential toll of the pursuit of punishment. Up to this point in time Fincher’s most mature work, as well as, on the surface, his least stylistically ambitious, Zodiac lacks the overt cop-versus-killer thrills of his genre hit Seven, but it will surely stand the test of time as a superlative entry in the crime canon, eventually sharing many a big city double-bill during retrospectives of the filmmaker’s work.
Based on the true story of a serial killer who for many years terrified the Northern California area and taunted authorities across the state with cryptic letters to the press, Zodiac is adapted from the non-fiction book of Robert Graysmith (Jake Gyllenhaal), a shy editorial cartoonist at the San Francisco Chronicle. On August 1, 1969, similar letters arrive in the press rooms of three different newspapers claiming responsibility for two previous attacks which left three young people dead and another critically injured. Along with details of the crimes are a series of coded messages, with instructions to publish them. By mid-October, two more assaults leave another two dead and one injured.
While San Francisco homicide detectives Dave Toschi (Mark Ruffalo) and William Armstrong (Anthony Edwards) work the case from their side, Graysmith indulges a growing interest in the awful affair with his gifted but cynical colleague, scruffy crime beat reporter Paul Avery (Robert Downey, Jr). Graysmith even unlocks a key reference to the 1932 film The Most Dangerous Game in one of the Zodiac’s ciphers; Avery becomes a stated target of the killer, touching off his downward descent into drugs and alcohol.
Inter-jurisdictional nightmares ensue. In decided contrast to the inviolabilities of modern-day forensics often showcased in such genre pieces, the police in Zodiac are shown to be continually frustrated by problems with respect to evidence analysis, tracing and simple coordination. Conflicting modes of exploit and the Zodiac’s contradictory staked claims to crimes he likely didn’t commit only muddy the waters. Over the course of many months and years, though, a tangled labyrinth of evidence eventually points to a compelling suspect. When this individual is cleared, Armstrong begs off the case. Graysmith, meanwhile, launches his own dogged investigation, conferring occasionally with a still haunted Toschi. Many more years pass. As much as the rigorously detailed Zodiac is about specifically its namesake case, it’s also a movie about the associated effects of the hunt for a murderer, and the heavy price — materially, socially, psychologically, emotionally — those seekers pay.
That screenwriter James Vanderbilt (Basic, The Rundown) avoids conventional payoffs is somewhat of a given knowing the nature of the material. It’s the dark humor and digressive details of his script, though, which help truly moor the story and add to its overall tension. They make the expansive backdrop, its galloping pace — weeks, months and sometimes even years flit by with dispassionate textual cards — and the manner in which characters flow in and out of the story feel even more real.
Zodiac‘s actual violence is relatively minimal, but frontloaded and grimly depicted. Fincher captures the sudden and arbitrary nastiness of these acts, and they carry a nasty wallop and enduring influence that hang menacingly over the rest of the film. Visually, Fincher applies the same exacting sense of detail and framing to Zodiac as his other films, abetted by Donald Graham Burt’s fantastic production design and occasional collaborator Harris Savides’ cinematography. Everything from the spot-on costumes, setting and newsroom lighting to David Shire’s score and a discerning selection of period rock tunes (Boz Scaggs, Donovan, Marvin Gaye, et al) exudes the time period in question. Fincher furthermore makes savvy use of a variety of directorial techniques — from a compressed montage of talk radio chatter to a time-lapsed sequence involving the construction of the city’s iconic Transamerica Building — to briskly and artfully convey wide swaths of time.
The cast is superbly chosen, and the performances are uniformly engaging in their own ways. Downey, Jr, impresses his own idiosyncratic charm onto the role of Avery, while Fincher bleeds Ruffalo of the undue earnestness that has weighed down some of his recent work, resulting in the actor’s most lingeringly memorable performance since You Can Count On Me. A brilliant new classic of its field, Zodiac breathes life into the police procedural drama, weaving a deeply humanistic tapestry.
Its outer cover a canted replication of the envelope from the first letter sent to the San Francisco Chronicle by the killer, Zodiac is presented on Blu-ray in 2.35:1 non-anamorphic 1080p widescreen, with an English language TrueHD 5.1 surround sound audio track and optional subtitles in English, English SDH, French and Spanish. Since it’s spread out over two discs, just like the double-disc director’s cut of the film that hit regular DVD last year, the picture and sound quality of the feature has plenty of room to breathe, and is of course superb — free from digital artifacting, and marked by deep, consistent colors. Two audio commentary tracks sit on the first disc with the film itself — one with Fincher and one a patchwork affair with Gyllenhaal, Downey, Jr., Vanderbilt, producer Brad Fischer and writer James Ellroy, who is unaffiliated with the movie itself but obviously knows a lot about criminal non-fiction. Of these, Fincher’s is marked by an impressive breadth and easygoing listenability, though both are superlative when stacked up against the vast majority of chat-alongs, simply owing to the intellect of their participants.
A quartet of meaty featurettes and a feature-length documentary occupy the set’s second disc, and collectively serve as a prime, top-shelf example of how Blu-ray’s extra space can be used to spotlight both production detail as well as extracurricular, but extremely relevant corroborative material. Running about an hour and 40 minutes, This is the Zodiac Speaking is a fascinating, comprehensive examination of the Zodiac case that includes sit-down chats with many of the real investigators and other people involved in the case. The movie itself, meanwhile, gets a in-depth, start-to-edit-bay overview that’s divided into seven chapters, and runs just under 55 minutes. A separate, chilling, 42-minute look at prime suspect Arthur Leigh Allen culls extra interview material from This is the Zodiac Speaking to take a closer look at the man Graysmith makes a convincing case was the Zodiac killer. In addition to the film’s theatrical trailer, shorter looks at Fincher’s great ease with digital effects and previsualization technique showcase how he was able to meticulously recreate entire neighborhoods, with spatial exactitude and great detail. To purchase the double-disc Blu-ray via Amazon, click here. A+ (Movie) A (Disc)