All posts by Brent

L.A. Superheroes

Amateurishly staged and unevenly acted, microbudget indie L.A. Superheroes is an indulgent, mishmashed immigrant/fringe-dweller‘s drama in which a couple artistically inclined Los Angelenos struggle to stay afloat (and in the country). Co-directed by multi-hyphenates Yelena Popovic and Alexandros Potter, from what they claim to be a collection of true-life stories witnessed firsthand, this dramatically impotent film serves as ample further evidence that, absent a unifying aesthetic and an artistic hand on the tiller, a camera simply turned back upon “real life” does not a compelling movie make.

Helena (Popovic) is a thirtysomething model who, after her work visa expired, apparently never got around to getting her paperwork in order. She has a wildly terrible manager, Angie (Catherine Carlen), who in addition to borrowing money from her client to make her car payment, also advises her to get a forged passport so she can go to Paris and do this big gig that’ll magically solve all her problems. Helena’s acting class friend, Auto (Alexander Zisiades), is a struggling musician who gets by delivering pizzas, though that doesn’t much seem to quell the rage he has toward the Los Angeles dating scene. After Helena secures a phony birth certificate through a contact of another friend, Sunny (T.J. Castronovo), things go sideways, and she becomes convinced she’s in danger for her life.

Weirdly titled, L.A. Superheroes unfolds in a series of languorously staged vignettes surrounding the fallout of this passport dilemma, but Short Cuts this isn’t. It aims for what is ostensibly a seriocomic tone (Auto’s advice to Helena before entering a potentially dangerous situation is to take a rock and not get shot in the face), but apart from a scene in which a woman feigns an injury in Runyon Canyon to catch the eye of a potential suitor, there’s nothing particularly amusing, clever or insightful about its eye and ear for random detail, and there’s additionally no compelling forward momentum, plot-wise. Helena’s husband gets quickly shunted off to the side, robbing the movie of at least the potential for some greater interpersonal dramatic friction.

Though it does feature a bit of decent music, L.A. Superheroes is shot through with nonsense — full of other tangents that never go anywhere. In theory Helena is also a would-be actress (hence the acting class), but the script attaches no particular aspiration or energy to her plight; indeed, there’s an extended sequence where an old New York friend shows up, invites her to dinner and then harangues her, reminding her that she in fact knows the director of “the year’s biggest movie,” Scumbag Club. Oh yeah, Helena realizes with a shrug… there’s that. Then it’s never really addressed again, leaving a viewer only their own glorious imagination in daydreaming up that fictitious hit. For more information on the film, click here to visit its website. (Simeon Productions, unrated, 78 minutes)

Clip

In 1995, Larry Clark’s controversial Kids, penned by Harmony Korine, depicted in unflinching fashion a world of druggy teenage lust and acting out. In 2003, the suburban-set Thirteen, starring Nikki Reed and Evan Rachel Wood, summoned forth some of the same sense of shock (and even dismissal) amongst the chattering class: This isn’t what our kids are doing… right?

Serbian writer-director Maja Milos channels that same raw, unfiltered, devil-may-care adolescent energy of those aforementioned films for her gripping directorial debut, Clip. Unnerving, intellectually thought-provoking and also at times kind of uncomfortably hot, Milos’ careening tale of teenage alienation is a much more acutely drawn portrait of the same sort of snotty, dangerous bloom of uninformed self-regard and material obsession than found in The Bling Ring.



Unfolding in a dreary Belgrade suburb, Clip centers around Jasna (Isidora Simojonivic), a young teenager who enjoys dancing around, lip-synching suggesting pop tunes (sample translated lyric: “My ego starts working and I ditch everyone/I’m a taboo for every male”) and taking even more suggestive cell phone selfies. Her mother (Sanja Mikitisin) occasionally goads her to study or help out around the house, but Jasna seems to live in a consequence-free environment. When her father (Jovo Maksic) is diagnosed with a terminal illness, Jasna — already alientated and adrift — starts partying even more, and enters into an increasingly unhealthy relationship with a boy at her school, Djole (Vukasun Jasnic).

Clip‘s inspiration came from Milos’ surprise at encountering explicit amateur footage of partying teenagers on the Internet — footage they’d uploaded themselves, either unaware or unconcerned with the consequences. And with its own graphic presentations of sexual encounters, there’s a certain jab to the solar plexus quality herein that at times recalls something like the even grittier Baise Moi as much as the aforementioned teen-centric films.

It’s in service of a larger psycho-social exploration, however, quite clearly. A couple of Milos’ story beats feel like academic overreach. There are moments Djole doesn’t react like a real teen; there’s an emotional indifference here that goes beyond blithe, “cool” young-guy posturing and, ringing false, suggests a much more manipulative, sociopathic, thirtysomething club cretin.

Still, if there are trace amounts of didacticism that bubble up to the surface every now and then, part of the skeevy brilliance of Clip is that it isn’t merely assaying unearned adolescent narcissism, it’s digging into the behavior and consciousness of teenagers who, bombarded by images from pornography and advertising, believe they know everything about sex before actually even experiencing it. It’s a generation of provocateurs who can talk about and analyze blowjobs without even really knowing how to flirt (“You play really well,” says Jasna awkwardly, after she and her friends fruitlessly wander several times by an asphalt soccer field on which Djole and other guys are playing.) In fact, when Djole first receives oral sex from Jasna, he’s much more concerned with framing the encounter on his cell phone than enjoying himself in the moment.

Milos’ mastery of charged mood and incorporation of subjective perspective gives Clip a tactile thrill, and it helps, too, that she doesn’t overwrite her movie, leadening it with exposition and obvious statements of feeling. But it would be criminal to praise Clip and not single out the performances Milos gets from her young (non-professional) actors, just as Clark did in Kids. With her raccoon eyeliner and a gaze that can alternate between teenage insouciance, wounded petulance and jailbait smoldering, Simojonivic has this movie in the palm of her hand, even if she doesn’t know it.

In a nice DVD packaging from Artsploitation Films, Clip comes to home video in a clear plastic Amaray case with a reversible sleeve featuring the movie’s original theatrical poster. Divided into a dozen chapters under a motion menu, it features a nice 2.10:1 widescreen transfer, with Dolby digital 5.1 and 2.0 stereo audio tracks under its English subtitles. Bonus features consist of a 12-page full-color insert booklet featuring an essay by Travis Crawford, and an excerpted interview between he and Milos, as well as trailers for Clip and a quartet of other Artsploitation titles, plus the main supplemental extra — a 22-minute interview with the filmmaker, in which she notes the inspiration of various socially aware Yugoslavian films of the 1960s and ’70s, and says that she had “no desire to make a traditional feel-good movie.” Mission accomplished. B+ (Movie) B+ (Disc)

Hannah Has a Ho-Phase


Agreeably cast but burdened with an overly predictable narrative and junior flyweight comedic punching power, New York-set indie Hannah Has a Ho-Phase is one of those post-Bridesmaids laffers (no matter its exact date of origin) that tries to put a Title IX spin on (slight) raunchiness and sexual acting out. In the zeitgeist shadow of works with much more strongly defined voices, however, like Lena Dunham‘s HBO series Girls, this slice of mock-shock has little going for it except for that great title and a few likable performances.



While her roommate and best friend Leslie (Genevieve Hudson Price), a pole-dancing instructor who digs no-strings-attached flings, frequently keeps her up at night with her bedroom antics, 25-year-old advertising associate Hannah (Meredith Forlenza, above left) finds herself in a bit of a dry spell. She’s dating a guy, but not having sex, and so after she spots said dude at a bar making out with another girl, Hannah impulsively accepts a bet from Leslie that she can more easily bed 10 guys in six weeks than Leslie can go without sex for the same time period.

Ergo, titular sexual oat-sowing ensues. All this coincides, of course, with an assignment at work where Hannah is paired with ladies man Donny (Quincy Dunn Baker) to research a potential campaign for a branded, vanity vodka line that a rapper wishes to launch. As Hannah starts to inch closer to hitting her target number, though, she begins to wonder if developing feelings for Donny are, a) sincere, and b) requited. Freed up from base-level attraction, meanwhile, Leslie accepts a date offer from schlubby, mustachioed Seth (Mike C. Nelson), but then struggles to convince him of the genuineness of her romantic interest.

Co-directed in flatly shot fashion by Nadia Munla and Jamie Jensen, from a script written by the latter, Hannah Has a Ho-Phase (and yes, that hyphen kind of bugs me) surfs along on a somewhat saucy wave, but it lacks the relative sophistication — and certainly the Dorothy Parker-esque dialogue snap — of films like Lola Versus or L!fe Happens, to name but two other femme-centric comedies of sexual exploration, acting out and/or consequence. A bit of the frank sex talk is funny, but once Hannah enters her blue period, the film’s qualified chasteness comes through; there’s no nudity herein, making for some awkward sex scenes that run counter to the dialogue. Munla and Jensen also seem afraid to mine supporting characters for laughs; the whole idea of the rapper, and especially him wanting to name his brand “Get It,” as a sexual come-on, is amusing, but the character appears once, as a third act throw-away.

Thankfully, though, the performances are for the most part enjoyable. Forlenza — who physically favors a mash-up of Rachel Weisz and Nia Vardalos — has a certain girl-next-door coquettishness, and a nice rapport with Price. Nelson, though, rather quietly steals the show. He’s gifted with a few funny lines (as when Seth queries Leslie as to her “art stance” when they visit a museum), but also nails the probing humor and deferential physicality of a guy punching up above his number. If only the rest of Hannah had his same slyness. In addition to its theatrical engagements, Hannah Has a Ho-Phase is also available on iTunes and across VOD platforms. For more information, click here to visit its website. For the full, original review, click here(Hourglass Entertainment/Kitty Kat Productions, R, 93 minutes)

World War Z




A choppy adaptation of Max Brooks’ beloved novel of the same name, World War Z, starring Brad Pitt, aims for a putative classy, ruminative sweet spot somewhere between pandemic thrillers like Contagion and Children of Men and pulse-quickening zombie survival tales like Dawn of the Dead and 28 Days Later and its sequel. But it ignores or fudges various geopolitical realities, and in fumbling away one of the chief strengths of its source material it morphs into just another anonymous quasi-post-apocalyptic blockbuster.

A poorly reasoned first act gives way to a number of admittedly crackling, professionally mounted set pieces largely unburdened by any necessary unification, but the degree of satisfaction with World War Z for many viewers will be inversely proportional to their familiarity with the source material — or indeed, even just a desire for intelligent complexity. For the full, original review, from Screen Daily, click here. (Paramount, PG-13, 116 minutes)

Twenty Feet From Stardom


The evocative title conjures up an immediate sense of intrigue, and Twenty Feet From Stardom, a new documentary about the unique lives and role of back-up singers, does not disappoint. Directed by Morgan Neville, this fascinating and eminently watchable little movie shines a deserving spotlight on those for whom singing is often chiefly about just sharing in a sense of harmonic enlightenment, not competition or means-to-an-end fame.

The subjects at the heart of Twenty Feet From Stardom are a varied bunch, but the film predominantly centers around five talented women. There’s 71-year-old Darlene Love, one of the bricks in Phil Spector‘s groundbreaking “Wall of Sound,” and a back-up singer to heavy hitters such as Frank Sinatra, Sam Cooke and Dionne Warwick; Merry Clayton, a preacher’s daughter whose voice has colored everything from Lynyrd Skynyrd‘s “Sweet Home Alabama” and Carole King’s “Way Over Wonder” to the Rolling Stones‘ “Gimme Shelter;” Lisa Fischer, who has a Grammy-winning solo album under her belt but tours with the Stones and Sting; Judith Hill, a back-up singer for Michael Jackson at the time of his death; and Tata Vega, whose turbulent career was improbably revitalized by The Color Purple.

Neville uses the interview recollections of these women as the backbone of his movie, but livens it up with a smartly curated collection of archival footage (and tunes, of course) that buoys their stories. More recognizable faces like Bruce Springsteen, Mick Jagger, Stevie Wonder, Sheryl Crow (herself a former back-up singer) and Bette Midler also pop up, sharing their thoughts both generally and specifically on back-up singing; Jagger and Clayton’s intercut reminiscences of the latter’s summoned-in-the-middle-of-the-night contributions to the unforgettable “Gimme Shelter” provide the film with an electric high point.

Like a great melody, Twenty Feet From Stardom sticks around in one’s head for a while, and stands a chance of popping up unannounced in a thought, weeks later. Its characters are lively, intelligent and articulate women who in several instances bear the marks of a system that took undue advantage of them. Perhaps this is why the mere cursory manner in which Neville touches on some of the racial and sexual components of his protagonists’ stories is by comparison so disappointing. The women here share a lot in common (backgrounds in church choirs, for instance) and yet Neville seems afraid or unable to dive past the surface of some of these similarities and examine them in relation to the music industry, and its legacy of a certain exploitation.

In short, Twenty Feet From Stardom seems largely content to trade on its anecdotal punching power. The chasm in psychology and personality between would-be lead singer and back-up singers is frequently evoked and discussed, but only up to a certain point, in a kind of thumbnail fashion. In this manner, Neville’s film leaves one wanting just a bit more. Fortunately, though, its stories are so rich in detail — and, alternately, humor, heartache and triumph — that one will leave never quite being able to listen to the FM dial in quite the same way. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. (Radius-TWC, unrated, 90 minutes)

The Wall

From Rod Serling’s The Twilight Zone to The Simpsons Movie and Stephen King’s Under the Dome, the notion of an area being impenetrably sealed off from contact with the outside world is a well-worn one, full of rich and easy dramatic veins through which to explore notions of human fallibility and transcendence. Unfortunately, said concept gets a tired workout in writer-director Julian Roman Pölsler’s plodding adaptation of Marlen Haushofer’s eponymous 1962 novel — a German/Austrian import so weighed down by a stereotypically angst-ridden voiceover of emotional numbness and philosophical despair that one could be forgiven for thinking Werner Herzog wrote it as a goof.

Set against a beautiful and at times stark northern Austrian mountain landscape, The Wall tells the tale of a nameless woman (Martina Gedeck) who finds herself suddenly and inexplicably cut off from all human contact when an invisible barrier surrounds the cabin where she’s vacationing. At first her only companion is a loyal dog, Lynx. Later, there’s a cow she comes across and names Bella; later still, a kitten she dubs Pearl. The only people she sees, however, exist frozen in time, outside this bubble. After only a couple rather cursory attempts at breaching the wall, the woman focuses her time on survival (changing weather continues unabated in said space) and channels her psychic energies inward; the film then cuts back and forth in time, as she records in a diary notes from her stay of several years.

Certain critics have praised The Wall as intensely cinematic, but apart from its natural scenery and superb sound design (the wall is given an electromagnetic hum) this could scarcely be further from the truth. Rather than even try to let his audience live, labor and panic alongside Gedeck’s character Pölsler instead ports over or invents large swaths of morose narration marked by maddening equivocations. A typical passage goes like this: “I sometimes think X. (pause) I don’t believe that, though — I just wish it so.”

The result is a movie that feels antsy, uncomfortable in its own skin and, somewhat paradoxically, intellectually manic — a schematic exercise in theory and philosophy, with writ-large Metaphorical Import. It takes place in the wild, but is disconnected from it. For a much more interesting portrait of the unforgiving nature of the wild, consider Herzog’s Happy People: A Year in the Taiga instead. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. In Los Angeles, The Wall opens at the Laemmle Royal, the Laemmle Pasadena Playhouse 7 and the Laemmle Encino Town Center 5. (Music Box Films, unrated, 108 minutes)

Rapture-Palooza

The idea of an Earth-bound fistfight between a foul-mouthed God and equally lewd Satan, complete with shots to the groin, sounds anarchic and wild. And certainly the participation of a roster of comedically gifted talents inspires some level of buzzy expectation. But in a post-South Park world, lazy execution of a ribald, potentially controversial concept will not suffice — especially not when the apocalypse is being handled with much more wit, vim and verve just across the megaplex, in the form of This Is the End. Thus the judgment of hearty disappointment falls upon Rapture-Palooza, a yawning, slapdash, would-be laffer in which a twentysomething Seattle native grapples with the discomfort and awkwardness of finding herself the object of the Anti-Christ’s affection.

After several billion people are raptured up to heaven, Lindsey (Anna Kendrick) and her boyfriend Ben (John Francis Daley) find themselves left back on Earth, with all the other heathens. The young couple tries to continue to lead some semblance of a normal life, amidst the downpours of blood, pot-smoking wraiths, and cursing crows and locusts, but it’s not that easy. Ben’s sycophantic father (Rob Corddry) has gone to work for the Anti-Christ (Craig Robinson), a garrulous taskmaster born Earl Gundy but who now goes by the moniker of Beast. When he whimsically settles on Lindsey to be his new bride, threatening to kill everyone she knows unless she assents, Lindsey and Ben concoct an on-the-fly, four-part plan to foil the Beast and cage him for 1,000 years.

Written by Chris Matheson and directed by Paul Middleditch, Rapture-Palooza locates a lot of its comedy in polarity. The Beast is a filthy-mouthed asshole who sings songs about his penis and spouts coarse come-ons like, “I bet your vagina tastes like pistachio mint ice cream” (and much worse). Shy-gal narrator Lindsey, meanwhile, is removed in a what-are-you-gonna-do? sort of manner, while the perpetually frustrated Ben finds himself in the awkward position of having his manhood undercut by Satan-in-waiting. To the extent that Rapture-Palooza is appealingly cast, this tack works in fits and starts.

The problem is that the Kevin Smith-type or South Park-y, sacrilegious stuff doesn’t play, because it’s not elevated, smart and specific enough. Plus, there’s no inner logic, even given the very low ceiling of the conceit. With the collapse of civilization, the idea of Ben and Lindsey saving money to operate their own sandwich cart so they in turn can afford to buy a house seems off. Presumably there would be lots of homes newly available, yes?

The movie is basically one big extended, inch-deep riff. It establishes the Beast’s infatuation with Lindsey in short order, gives her eight hours to decide a course of action, and then has she and Ben devise and then attempt to implement said plan to take him down. Laden with voiceover, a compacted first 15 minutes sketches out some of the specifics of this particular post-apocalyptic world, but Rapture-Palooza ignores much fun that could be had with the notion of the Anti-Christ as a former politician, even in ancillary fashion. In fact, pretty much every good idea it has — the notion, for instance, that Lindsey’s mom (Ana Gasteyer) is sent back to Earth after complaining too much at the gates of Heaven — it abandons in short order (frequently in favor of some bit of borderline obscenity from Robinson), as if it’s engaged in a game of plot-point hot potato.

The film’s high point, for those who remember the fifth season “Cape Feare” episode of The Simpsons, and its glorious Sideshow Bob rake-to-the-face bit, involves a litany of repeated shootings when Lindsey and Ben’s plan goes sideways. In its sheer over-the-top absurdity, it elicits out-loud laughs. Unfortunately, it’s too little, too late for Rapture-Palooza, a movie bogged down in a tedious spin cycle of crassness. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. (Lionsgate, R, 85 minutes)

Dances With Films: Us

A recent world premiere at the 16th annual Dances With Films, the Los Angeles-set Us offers up an unusual yet sympathetically pitched examination of mental illness through the rubric of a weird love triangle. Anchored by a superlative lead turn from Alanna Ubach, this micro-budgeted, worthwhile indie feature could, given a wide enough audience, serve as an important pivot-point for the actress, leading her into more dramatic terrain.

At first glance, Margaret (Ubach) seems like just a garden variety alcoholic — another thirtysomething wounded bird who drowns her unhappiness in booze and unfulfilling sexual encounters with seedy and abusive men. When she comes to after having blacked out in a bar, a lonely employee there, Jeff (Patrick Russell), lets her out before locking up. Later, a sympathetic social worker named Walker (Michael Navarra) happens upon Margaret on the street, and after a bit of conversation, leaves her his phone number. Once sober, Margaret relents to a proper date with him. Though cautious at first, she even begins to entertain the idea of having a real relationship.

One problem, however, lies in Margaret’s multiple personality disorder, which keeps Walker at bay and feeds an often less-than-healthy decision making process. The additional rub is that Jeff becomes a sort of guardian angel stalker — though not a very good one. Margaret finds out about Jeff’s peeping-Tom trailing of her, and invites him in for tea and conversation. Their strange and uneasy platonic bond, then, eventually intersects with Walker’s efforts to intervene in what he views as Margaret’s downward spiral into self-destruction.

In his feature debut, writer-director Sam Hancock concocts an interesting prism through which to refract a more serious mental illness; it obviously says something about both Walker and Jeff, and their co-dependence, that they’re drawn toward Margaret. The chief problem is that these supporting characters are so thinly and problematically sketched. For a supposed social worker, there’s a downright implausible lack of insight to Walker’s understanding and treatment of Margaret as he gets to know her better (“She’s moody,” he says at one point, after he should know much better). Jeff, meanwhile, is kind of a cipher — a vaguely free-form loner version of Wes Bentley’s disaffected character from American Beauty, minus any daddy issues or videocamera equipment. Despite game efforts from Navarra and Russell, these characters don’t rise to multi-dimensionality. As such, Us doesn’t feel like an equilaterally apportioned narrative but rather just a character piece with a couple wobbly wheels.

Thankfully, though, Us has Ubach. Better known for her comedic performances in movies like Legally Blonde, Meet the Fockers and Waiting…, Ubach brings a full-bodied complexity to Margaret, capturing both her vulnerability and the steely resolve and investment she has in protecting the walls she’s built up around her. She’s abetted by a script that really understands the relationship between a multiple personality disorder and sexual acting out (“That’s how people respond to me,” says Margaret at one point), as well as the character’s real angst and panic at the idea of letting go of the personalities, of letting them “die” (“They’re all I know!” she later rages).

In its atypical focus, Us does the broader issue of mental illness a great service. It showcases the impaired thinking that can lead to a variety of bad and dangerous situations. But it also examines the inwardly reflected insecurity that comes with trying to cope with such problems absent any greater support structure. When Margaret says, “You don’t want me — you want some cleaned-up, stripped-down version of me,” it’s heart-piercing in its directness, and the cold truth that informs Walker’s good-hearted desire to “fix” her. Us knows human complication, and puts a light on it. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. For more information on Us, click here to visit its website. (Umbrage Entertainment, unrated, 107 minutes)

Dances With Films: Steve Chong Finds Out That Suicide Is a Bad Idea

A recent world premiere at the 16th annual Dances With Films, the evocatively titled micro-budget indie film Steve Chong Finds Out That Suicide Is a Bad Idea tries to put a bearded, decidedly fraternal spin on the whole Return of the Secaucus 7 sub-genre, wherein young adults gather and grapple with changes in life and their relationships. If there’s a certain easygoing charm to the movie, there’s also a lack of forward-leaning momentum or insight to make these characters stick to the psyche.

Scripted by Owen Hornstein, from a story concocted by his other three male costars and director Charlie LaBoy, Steve Chong breezes along nicely, a kind of down-tempo riff on The Hangover, in which guys get together, imbibe alcohol and give each other some shit. (Fear not, neither tigers nor Mike Tyson make an appearance. Sadly, neither does Heather Graham.) Big-punchline jokes aren’t really on the agenda here, but rather comedy of awkwardness and humiliation rooted in grudges over an old love triangle and the like.

Unfortunately, while the title holds true in the literal sense, Steve (Stanley Wong, also an editor on the project) is mostly a cipher, and interesting details regarding the other characters remain half-sketched. Most frustratingly, though, the film doesn’t really try to tap deep into Steve’s pathological shyness, or any of the cultural considerations that may inform it. So is it a comedy, or a drama? It’s sort of both, really, but without much punch or bite in either direction. Lacking much in the way of dynamism, the movie merely bobs along — pleasantly, for the most part, but in ultimately forgettable fashion. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. (Steve Chong The Movie LLC, unrated, 81 minutes)

Randy Orton Talks WWE, Film Debut, Tattoos and More


Perhaps it’s only natural, given their often larger-than-life personas, but professional wrestlers have been among the biggest beneficiaries of modern-day “branding” and branching out in the entertainment world. Among the latest WWE figures to test the acting waters is nine-time world champion Randy Orton, who takes his first crack at a starring role in 12 Rounds 2: Reloaded, a discretely plotted sequel/spin-off to 2009’s 12 Rounds, starring John Cena. In the movie, Orton plays Nick Malloy, an emergency medical technician who finds himself locked in a Saw-like game of cat-and-mouse with a vigilante tied to his past. Recently, I had a chance to talk to Orton one-on-one, about acting outside versus inside the ring, his wrestling family roots, and his tattoos, among other things. The conversation is excerpted over at ShockYa, so click here for the read.

This Is the End




Fleshing out their unreleased 2007 short film Jay and Seth vs. The Apocalypse, multi-hyphenate Seth Rogen and co-producer Jay Baruchel delve into end times with the winning, unabashedly vulgar This Is the End, in which a bunch of comedic Hollywood actors, playing themselves, cope with panic and paranoia while Armageddon unfolds outside around them. Befitting the backslapping nature of its casting, there are inside jokes and side-winding conversational riffs aplenty, but Rogen and his cowriter-director, Evan Goldberg, honor the conceit in all its zonked-out glory, studding their movie with slapstick gore, eccentric supernaturalism, some skewering of disaster and horror movie conventions, and lots of smart digs at particularly masculine vanity and insecurity.

While a lot of the humor in This Is the End trades in baser instincts (there are drugs, projectile vomiting and even point-of-view footage from a decapitated head, and an array of phalluses also make appearances, including the largest glimpsed onscreen since Watchmen), all the irreverent bickering and lashing out leads to some terrifically funny bits. And the movie gets in enough shots at horror films and the recent glut of siege tales to partially qualify as genre parody. Mostly, though, This Is the End is a relationship picture, with an improbably sincere ribbon of fraternal feeling and uplift. For the full, original review, from Screen Daily, click here(Sony, R, 106 minutes)

Dances With Films: Tumor: It’s in the System


A recent Los Angeles premiere at the 16th annual Dances With Films, Tumor: It’s in the System joins a considerable slate of contemporary documentaries — inclusive of Peter Nicks’ raw, verité-style The Waiting Room — offering up a damning assessment of different elements of the American health care system. Here it’s a look at how potential alternative treatments (like divisive Gerson therapy) and even cures for cancer have been suppressed since the early 1900s — the implication being that some combination of the bureaucratic regulatory system and the rapacious self-interest of capitalism have combined to incentivize managed treatment of symptoms over the long-term health of the population.

Such material has the capacity to tip over into “black helicopter” territory fairly quickly, but co-directors Valerie McCaffrey and Cindy Pruitt, despite a fevered sense of advocacy that sometimes gets the better of their editorial plotting, do a generally good job of interweaving testimonials from an array of open-minded physicians and unusual survivors whose stories belie the myth that chemotherapy is the only — or indeed, even the best — way to combat cancer. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here(Become a Revolution Productions, unrated, 76 minutes)

Dances With Films: Kumpania


Hardcore fans of Dancing With the Stars may find ancillary enjoyment and reward in the nonfiction offering Kumpania, which just enjoyed a Los Angeles premiere at the 16th annual Dances With Films. A concise documentary look at flamenco dancing and music, director Katina Dunn’s movie is a subcultural curio invested with much depth of feeling. Those with a predetermined investment in its rhythms will want to get up and dance along. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here(Piece O’ Work Productions, unrated, 61 minutes)

Dances With Films: Emoticon ;)


The directorial debut of multi-hyphenate Livia De Paolis and a mid-week world premiere at the Dances with Films Festival, Emoticon 😉 (yep, smiley face included, technically) delves into early-onset mid-life uncertainty by way of a career-minded woman’s unexpected pregnancy, and the unlikely friendships she develops with the two teenage kids of her much older lover. Professionally mounted and attractively photographed, this independent production is a fresh, off-the-beaten-path conceit that gets mileage from its willingness to examine notions of non-nuclear family and changing identity.

The story centers around Elena (De Paolis), a 33-year-old PhD. candidate whose boyfriend, Walter (director Michael Cristofer, taking a turn on the other side of the camera), is a divorced father in his 60s. His two kids — teenagers four months apart adopted from separate birth mothers when they were babies, Mandy (Diane Guerrero) and Luke (Miles Chandler) — are at first wary of the presence of yet another new woman in their dad’s life, but when it seems like Elena will be sticking around they open up a bit and Elena wins them over. After having never wanted children previously, meanwhile, when Elena becomes pregnant, she weighs whether her attitude has changed.

Working from a script co-written with Sarah Nerboso, De Paolis proves herself to be a capable filmmaker and an interesting writer, at least from a theoretical perspective, as Emoticon avoids a lot of the pitfalls of vanity writer-director-actor projects, wherein supporting characters get shunted off to the sides. There’s an easy, unforced quality to in particular the adolescent performances here, and Emoticon connects early on for these very reasons. It’s rooted in character, and not concerned with the overly rigid dictates of a capital-N narrative.

Unfortunately, once Elena’s pregnancy is introduced, the film’s plotting starts to lean more heavily on artificial construction. There’s forced parallelism (a pregnancy scare involving Luke’s girlfriend), and when Elena suffers her own tragedy, both Walter and Elena’s mother (Sonia Braga) have to offer up inappropriate and/or tone-deaf responses, in order to baldly goose the dramatic stakes. This is kind of a shame, just because it feels like a punt — the trading in of a messier, more interesting reality for something less honestly derived from character, and more about unnatural catharsis.

Overall, Emoticon isn’t bad, but it also doesn’t reach down quite deep enough for something gritty and true. Its title — which on the surface seems like an odd fit — relates to Elena’s putative research into teens’ use of social media, and how it shapes their relationships, but De Paolis, who has a generally appealing on-screen presence, doesn’t dig deep enough into her character’s intellectual endeavors. When it’s kicking around on the fringe, Emoticon flirts with some interesting things to say about the shifting nature of identity and how it’s tethered to other groups, and even fertility. Too bad that the movie doesn’t bound off into the weeds, but instead stays too close to the familiar, carved garden path. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. (Circus Road Productions, unrated, 79 minutes)

Liane Balaban Talks Finding Joy, Sexual Knuckling, More

Liane Balaban made quite an impression as Dustin Hoffman’s sweetly sad, set-to-wed daughter in Last Chance Harvey, and will be recognizable to plenty of folks from her recurring role on the small screen’s Supernatural. In her latest film, however, Balaban gets to channel a wild, daffy femininity whose unhinged, slightly damaged siren call will strike a chord of familiarity in many a guy. Finding Joy finds disillusioned author Kyle (Josh Cooke) returning home and having to cope with various indignities tossed his way by his estranged father (Barry Bostwick) and new stepmother (Lainie Kazan). When he meets Balaban’s spunky bohemian title character, frustrated, comedically-inflected romance ensues. I recently had a chance to talk with the Canadian-born actress one-on-one, about Finding Joy, superstitions, her unisex menstruation website and more. The conversation is excerpted over at ShockYa, so click here for the read.

Free China: The Courage to Believe


It’s safe to say that Michael Perlman, the director of the new documentary Free China: The Courage to Believe, won’t be receiving the red carpet treatment any time soon in the glorious People’s Republic of China. (Hell, even simply attaching my name to anything other than a vicious attack review may bring about a mysterious denial-of-service incident on this site.) A damning nonfiction look at the human rights abuses of the world’s most populous country as filtered specifically through the oppression of Falun Gong practitioners and two enormously sympathetic, steel-spined subjects, Perlman’s film makes a case for the indomitability of the human spirit and the eventual futility of unreasonable autocratic will.

Free China is so interesting (and important, plus in an odd way reassuring) not merely because it exposes some of the specifics of China’s abysmal human rights record, but because it also ties this issue in with unfair and unjust labor practices. The stories — both individually and on a macro level — are a travesty, certainly, but if there’s a cold comfort to be found it’s in the long-game absurdity of the Chinese government’s attempts to build a Great Internet Firewall, whereby it can keep out all influences and voices around the world it deems inappropriate, and crash it at a moment’s notice to stifle any gathering storm of protest. This may work for a generation, maybe two. But human nature trends toward curiosity, and freedom. It’s a losing strategy in the long term, especially as international consensus pools in areas unattached to China’s opinions. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. For more information on the movie and how to take up the banner of its social cause, meanwhile, click here to visit the film’s website. (World2Be Productions, unrated, 61 minutes)

Andrea Riseborough on Shadow Dancer, Her Music Past

She’s already played some famous women — Margaret Thatcher and Wallis Simpson among them, the latter in Madonna’s W.E. — but British-born actress Andrea Riseborough has remained, Stateside at least, something of an unknown. After stealing scenes from Tom Cruise in this spring’s Oblivion, however, that will remain difficult.

Her latest film is director James Marsh‘s Shadow Dancer, based upon Tom Bradby’s same-named novel. In it, Riseborough plays Collette McVeigh, a single mother in 1990s Belfast who, after getting nabbed in an aborted IRA bomb plot, is given a choice by a steely MI5 officer (Clive Owen): lose everything and go to prison for 25 years, or spy and provide information on her hardliner brothers and other IRA members. Recently, I had a chance to speak with Riseborough one-on-one, about her movie, her curious past in avant-garde music, what she enjoys about life in “terrifyingly Republican” Idaho, and what’s next professionally. The chat is excerpted over at Yahoo Movies, so click here for the fun read.

Now You See Me

Four separate magic performers come together, Avengers-style (“Magicians assemble!”), in Now You See Me, a jaunty, Ocean’s-style heist thriller with comedic overtones. Smart casting, agreeable performances and a fresh narrative backdrop power this facile, twisty treat, helmed by Louis Leterrier. If the Robin Hood-esque redistribution-of-wealth undertaking which its protagonists undertake remains a bit undersketched and opportunistic, it barely dents the momentum of this rolling, pleasure-delivering puzzlebox, starring Jesse Eisenberg, Woody Harrelson, Isla Fisher, Mark Ruffalo and Morgan Freeman, among others. For the full, original review, from Screen Daily, click here. (Summit, PG-13, 115 minutes)

Déjà Viewing: Gone in 60 Seconds

Buoyed by deservedly positive word-of-mouth, Fast & Furious 6 topped the box office this past weekend, with a $97 million opening weekend. Yet the sequel also represents something of a turning point for Universal’s brawny, lucrative franchise, as it pivots away from its roots in underground street-racing, micro-skirt ogling and barely concealed homoeroticism (well, OK, those last two still exist) and into a sort of revenge-tinged heist/criminal takedown series, in the vein of The Italian Job.

An important antecedent to the series highly worth checking out, however, is Gone in 60 Seconds. No, no, no… not the 2000 remake starring Nicolas Cage before he lost his battle with hairplugs and Angelina Jolie before she became more fully stabilized, but the original 1974 film from multi-hyphenate H.B. Halicki, which laid waste to almost 100 vehicles over the course of its sprawling centerpiece car chase. If the Fast & Furious franchise has been employment heaven for the small army of sound mixers, digital effects compositors and, yes, stunt drivers who help breathe life into its most gloriously over-the-top moments, Halicki’s movie is a throwback to the days of leaner, meaner, hands-on destruction — before genre cash-dashes became Hollywood studio tentpoles. I write more words about it over at Yahoo Movies, so click here to give it a read.

Epic

Its title conjures visions of mythological battle or perhaps a questing journey, but the story at the core of the animated family film Epic is actually a much more familiar, environmentally-friendly tale. Centering on a teenage girl who gets shrunken down to a couple inches and must then band together with a whimsical set of characters in order to protect a surrounding forest, Epic takes aim mostly at the lowest-hanging fruit of entertainment, and achieves serviceable delight around the edges. For the full, original review, from Screen Daily, click here. (20th Century Fox, PG, 102 minutes)

Before Midnight: Richard Linklater, Julie Delpy and Ethan Hawke

Most sequels are born of financial consequence, Hollywood studio calculation/desperation, movie star/producer hubris, or some combination thereof. That’s certainly not the case with Before Midnight, which again, like its predecessor, ranks as one of the more charming, and unlikely, cinematic follow-ups of the modern era.

In 1995’s Before Sunrise, director Richard Linklater cast Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy as Jesse and Celine, a pair of young kids who cross paths on a European train and decide to kill 14 hours in Vienna before the former is due to catch a plane back home. He’s American, she’s French, and their cross-cultural, philosophically-tinged, flirty back-and-forth served as a heady cinematic stand-in for all the swollen romantic possibility of young adulthood. With its 2004 follow-up, Before Sunset, Hawke and Delpy expanded on their roles as performers in the original talky tête-à-tête, taking co-writing credits with Linklater in telling the story of a chance encounter some years later in Paris.

Thus, the first two movies in this series — neither of which is an absolute viewing requirement to submit to the charms of this offering — were very much stories where the journey was the point of the ride; they were fun, literate, thought-provoking cynic-romantic measuring sticks about tantalizing roads considered if not fully taken. Much more than its predecessors, then (and necessarily, given its characters’ ages), Before Midnight is a film that unfolds in the shadow of consequences. Life choices have been made, and Jesse and Celine must grapple with all the additional baggage that comes with any accrued wisdom in age. It’s a movie about adult romance that doesn’t pull punches about the difficulties of trying to carve a path through life to walk two-astride in good faith and keenness. For more from a recent discussion with Hawke, Delpy and Linklater about the film, click here to trip on over to ShockYa.

Crazy Wisdom


Crazy Wisdom focuses on a subject perhaps worthy of a documentary, but is hopelessly obscured by fawning and myopia. Director Johanna Demetrakas sets her sights on Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche, a brilliant Tibetan monk who on foot escaped the 1959 Communist invasion of his homeland in quite unlikely fashion, studied and taught at Oxford University, and then shattered Westerner’s preconceptions of Buddhist enlightenment, renouncing his monastic vows, bedding students, drinking alcohol and eventually eloping with the 16-year-old daughter of an aristocrat.

Known in many circles as “the bad boy of Buddhism,” Trungpa was at the forefront of a movement that saw Eastern faith, religion, healing and consciousness all slip west, and commingle heartily with both American hippiedom and left-leaning academia. But was he corrupted by Western materialism, and living a massively hypocritical life? Or did his work to dismantle aggression and build an enlightened society based on compassion and respect trump the seeming contradictions of some of his methodology?

Crazy Wisdom is constructed in a languid fashion, with stories of remembrance from Trungpa’s wife and students, including poet Allen Ginsberg and author Pema Chodron, as well as colleagues and critics like American guru Ram Dass and scholar Robert Thurman. And there are a couple moments of piqued intrigue here — Ginsberg asking Trungpa about his opinions of jazz and rock ‘n’ roll — and certainly a sprinkling of naked provocation and fascinating contradictions as they relate to Trungpa’s personal life. Mostly, though, the film is a hermetically sealed document of boosterism.

Bluntly put, Demetrakas never manages to hoist the movie up out of its miasma of spiritual navel-gazing and self-congratulation, truly connecting Trungpa’s work to American counterculture’s emergence and life overall. The film accepts — and indeed, starts from — the premise that Trungpa was a wildly influential and trailblazing figure, and unassailably brilliant. And while it’s true that he played an integral role in Buddhism’s introduction to the West, even starting the first Buddhist university in the western hemisphere, there isn’t enough of a honest examination of Trungpa’s foibles to crack through its worshipful veneer. Trungpa have been a crazy and interesting figure, but Crazy Wisdom is mostly a snooze.

Housed in a regular plastic Amaray case, Crazy Wisdom comes to DVD presented in 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen, with a Dolby digital 5.1 surround sound audio track. In addition to its theatrical trailer, the DVD includes extended scenes and rough cuts from the editing bay, as well as an interview chat with Demetrakas. To purchase the DVD via Half, click here; if Amazon is your thing, meanwhile, click hereC- (Movie) B- (Disc)

Aaron Eckhart on Erased, His iPhone and Filipino Stick-Fighting

The rare sort of actor who can swing between Harold Hill-type independent film character work and credible, B-list leading man action hero, Aaron Eckhart has, in his latter incarnation, matched wits with aliens, terrorists and the disastrous effects of climate change. So it makes perfect sense that he’d want to tackle a chance to go full-on Jason Bourne. In Erased, he plays ex-CIA agent Ben Logan, who discovers that his high-tech security job in Brussels has been a sham. Marked for termination, Ben escapes with his teenage daughter Amy (Liana Liberato), and tries to stay one step ahead of his dangerous adversaries while also unraveling a wide-ranging international conspiracy that may trace back to an old agency colleague (Olga Kurylenko). I recently had a chance to speak to Eckhart one-on-one, about Erased, his love for his iPhone, his next projects, and the Filipino art of stick-fighting he’s mastered. The conversation is excerpted over at ShockYa, so click here for the read.

Tight

A deeply weird… thing, Tight is a movie about a same-named all-female band — comprised of four porn stars, managed by porn starlet Bree Olson, and the winner of Howard Stern’s “Triple X Factor” contest. A cover blurb on the front bills it as a mockumentary, while the back touts a Best Documentary victory at the 2012 Humboldt International Film Festival. So which is it? Well, it’s as phony as a pair of augmented breasts, to be sure, but no matter the degree to which its participants are supposed to be in on the joke (or, indeed, what exactly the joke is supposed to be), Tight takes most its cues from reality TV, actually, particularly of the partying-catfights-and-histrionics variety.

Clocking in at an unwieldy 114 minutes, Tight charts the band from putative inception (a re-enacted conversation between Olson and selected frontwoman Monica Mayhem, just prior to a shared sex scene) to inevitable disintegration, with all the obligatory direct-address confessionals and boozy trash-talking one might expect. Along with Mayhem, Olson tabs bassist Layla Labelle, guitarist Tuesday Cross and neophyte drummer Alicia Andrews, though how and why these girls are selected is kind of a mystery. They’re then thrown together in a house and given a week to rehearse before opening for another porn-star-turned-singer and then hitting the road. Predictably, these personalities clash. Or I guess “clash” would be the more appropriate phrasing. Olson pops up at shows and phones in to offer advice, while several oddball supporting characters — including Olson’s cousin (billed onscreen as Joel Kane, and as Joel Chanin in the credits), who eats sardines and blocks out her face with his thumb while watching her film porn scenes — abet the rolling chaos.

Shaun Donnelly takes a writer-director credit on Tight, which conspicuously shoots around the crowds (or lack thereof) at the band’s shows, and otherwise trades in set-ups so obviously staged (running out of money on the road, the girls go to a strip club to train and make some extra cash) as to at times make the movie seem like a send-up of the artificial, puffed-up drama of socialite-type TV. Other bits, though — “golden condom” tosses for backstage passes at a show — seem included as part of some porn-fantasy spin-off, and edited-around explicit bathroom footage hints at a hardcore version of the film (or at least gonzo scenes) somewhere out in the ether. So the specter of the adult industry is never far, but the problem is that Tight doesn’t track as a parody — its construction at times leans toward the comedic but is mostly just slapdash, and it’s obviously caught up in the same spin cycle of petty grievances and fragile egos that would ostensibly be the target of any smart, winking tweak of nonfiction. In other words, this ambling, rambling movie is real, but wrapped up in a cloak of mimicry, in an effort to pass that off as smart entertainment.

Housed in a regular plastic Amaray case, Tight comes to DVD on a region-free disc from distributor Wild Eye, presented in 16×9 widescreen with a Dolby digital 2.0 stereo audio track. Under static menu and sub-menu screens, the movie comes divided into four (?) chapters, but with no subtitle options (sorry denizens of Thailand). Bonus features include of an array of trailers, music videos, a photo gallery, and extra live concert footage inclusive of the tunes “Run For It” from a Las Vegas gig, “Slave” from Los Angeles, and “Wasted” from Denver. The main extra, though, is a substantive collection of 22 deleted scenes which is saddled by having no play-all function. Many of these track with the same posed qualities of the movie, but hey — it’s kind of amusing to hear Olson explain the pawning off of a product endorsement of a vibrator that plugs into iPods and, ummm, stimulates to played music. To purchase the DVD, click here. D (Movie) C+ (Disc)

The Revisionaries


A remarkably humane and well-rounded look at a perhaps unlikely yet nonetheless incredibly divisive political hot-button issue, director Scott Thurman’s The Revisionaries delves into the Texas School Board of Education’s attempts to vacuum out through legislation various language and historical examples objectionable to movement conservatives from the nation’s textbooks. Pointed without being nasty or unfair, this fascinating movie is a gripping, must-see work for nonfiction film aficionados, politicos and current events intellectuals alike — an engrossing social document of our turbulent times and often at-odds relationship with not only science but, more broadly, experts-in-field.



It seems utterly ridiculous, but in Austin, Texas, 15 people actually sit ready to exert undue influence over what is taught to the next generation of American schoolchildren. Once every decade, the state’s Board of Education (BOE) rewrites the teaching and textbook standards for its nearly five million students. And when it comes to textbooks (because of the state’s purchasing power, and 110 percent upfront payment), what happens in Texas affects the nation as a whole, since textbook manufacturers are often hesitant to act against their “recommendations.”

Various right-wing organizations have cannily sought to advance their agenda through this process, making for an unusual frontline in the country’s ongoing, so-called culture war. After briefly serving on his local school board, Don McLeroy (above), a dentist and avowed young-Earth creationist, was elected to the BOE, and later appointed chairman. During his time on the board, McLeroy — who once declared, “Education is too important not to be politicized” — has overseen the adoption of new science and history curriculum standards, aided by Liberty University law professor Cynthia Dunbar and others.

The Revisionaries charts this bureaucratic trench warfare, wherein language regarding evolution and intelligent design is argued about back and forth, and subjected to various amendments. Kathy Miller, of the liberal-minded Texas Freedom Network, and Ron Wetherington, an anthropology professor from Southern Methodist University, are among those who weigh in on behalf of what is widely accepted as settled science during these board meeting debates, where politicking and barely concealed contentiousness are ever-present, bubbling just around the edges. Later, as the debate shifts to language about topics like slavery, suffrage, the Civil Rights Movement and important minority historical figures, McLeroy fights for his chairmanship and then his very re-election to the BOE.

Through all of this, director Thurman gives equal time to these heartily clashing viewpoints. Rather than remaining satisfied with leaning on two-dimensional archetypes, he gives all of the aforementioned subjects a chance to explain both their personal views and their opinions of the BOE’s mission. The movie also follows McLeroy around at his dental practice and church, showing a private side of him that sometimes contrasts his rhetoric (in both directions) in interesting ways. The result, rather remarkably, deflates the fanned flames of partisan discord, while still highlighting the legitimate stakes involved in some of the curious erasures the more right-wing members of the BOE seek. The Revisionaries takes a state issue that has national implications, but doesn’t hog-tie it to national frenzy and political party talking points.

It helps, of course, that Thurman’s subjects are for the most part impassioned but not rhetorical bomb-throwers of the first order. Wetherington is a calm but shrewd academic who doesn’t stoop to automatically demonizing his foes; after all, he can parry with facts and scientific method, so when he decries the “flammable mixture of ignorance and arrogance” involved in the GOP’s rabblerousing pushback against so-called elites, it has less unfocused rage and more the surgically precise, knuckle-rapping exasperation of your favorite Socratic teacher. McLeroy, too, for his part, comes across less as a conniving anti-intellectual and more genuinely befuddled by the contempt for his efforts — a decent family man trying to split perhaps unsplittable hairs when it comes to pruning “liberal” viewpoints and claiming that he is not actually advocating for his personal beliefs.

Housed in a regular plastic Amaray case, The Revisionaries comes to DVD presented in a crisp, 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen transfer, with a distortion-free Dolby digital 2.0 stereo audio track. Unfortunately, apart from chapter stops and the movie’s theatrical trailer, there are no supplemental bonus features, which is a real shame for a topic like this that really lends itself to deep-diving topical inclusions from a variety of sources. Nevertheless, to purchase the DVD via Amazon, click here; to purchase it via Half, click here. Or if locally owned brick-and-mortar establishments in your area are a viable option, by all means, go that route. A- (Movie) D+ (Disc)