Category Archives: Ephemera

Foreign Language Nominee Division of Labor

So what exactly was the deal, in announcing the Golden Globe nominees for Best Foreign Language Film, with sticking the somewhat rather thickly accented Djimon Hounsou with the directors of Volver, Pan’s Labyrinth and The Lives of Others — meaning he had to pronounce, in quick succession, the names of Pedro Almodovar, Guillermo del Toro and Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck — while co-presenter Sharon Stone got to namecheck… Clint Eastwood and Mel Gibson. Was that a desire to get everyone to lean forward in their seats, or a reflection of someone’s consideration that perhaps Hounsou would be more sober than Stone?

Oh, Orenthal…

Off topic, especially amidst all the awards chatter, but Timothy Noah has an interesting piece up on Slate about that most famous of (alleged) Los Angeles murderers, O.J. Simpson, in advance of Mark Miller’s piece this week in Newsweek regarding the same. The subject: that explosive chapter of the imploded hypothetical confession If I Did It. So… a friend called “Charlie,” ehh? And Noah points out “the lack of subjunctive tense.” Well, sure. The final chapter is yet to be written, but does anyone doubt that it’s going to end badly for this guy? Like, spectacularly badly. Bad fiction-type badly.

Eastwood’s Confidence, Scorsese’s Bowels

Props to Clint Eastwood’s “This does wonders for my confidence” crack
— echoing Best Supporting Actress winner Jennifer Hudson’s remarks
from earlier in the evening — upon receiving the Best Foreign Language
Golden Globe for Letters from Iwo Jima. When he said that, Martin Scorsese no doubt laughed weakly and crapped his pants.

I still think Scorsese has the directorial prize sewn up tonight, and is far better shape to  trump Eastwood and (finally) score his long-coveted Best Director Academy Award. In The Departed, he’s got the stronger film. Look for a bulge in the back of his pants, though, when he waddles up on stage…

Getting Out the Vote for Bobby

an interesting piece in today’s Los Angeles Times focusing on Harvey Weinstein’s go-for-broke strategy with regards to garnering Academy Awards attention for  Emilio Estevez’s Bobby. The gist of the piece is about how Weinstein is flogging a Screen Actors Guild nomination for Best Ensemble Cast — the new Crash model for darkhorse success — and hoping that, along with TV and print ads touting positive rank-and-file audience reaction, yields some Oscar noms.

Though we’ll doubtlessly be subjected to the trotting out of both Charlie and Martin Sheen, in an effort to score some sort of familial goodwill, there won’t be any Bobby surprise upset at the Golden Globes — the competition in the dramatic film category is too strong. Still, don’t discount Weinstein’s shrewd (and devoted) strategy, or place the film on ice just yet. I’ve said before that Bobby is basically a movie that’s as good as one allows it to be, meaning that as things get worse in Iraq and abroad, people are more receptive to the plaintive chords of hope that Bobby strikes. Any Oscar nominations would be reflective of this.

Still, I have a friend who can’t fathom any continued awards talk, and rants that Bobby is, and I quote, “TV-level filmmaking… like Cold Case: The Movie. It’s all two-person set-ups, lacking cinematic scope and nuance.” And for the record, he voted for Bush once, but not a second time…

On Idiocracy and Children of Men

Dana Stevens has an interesting piece up today on Slate about Mike Judge’s Idiocracy, just out recently on DVD, in comparison to Alfonso Cuaron’s Children of Men. The gist of the piece is that it’s slightly unnerving that two of the year’s more underappreciated and snuffed films — certainly from a marketing perspective — also happen to be the two that probably ask
us to peer most deeply into the mirror and contemplate our shared future
and its correlation to the way we interact with one another and comport ourselves culturally and socially.

It’s an interesting thesis, and there’s probably something there. While I think Universal’s marketing of Children of Men falls more into the category of simply not knowing what they had, I previously speculated about the reasoning of Fox’s bizarre dumping of Idiocracy here. The maintenance of the well-groomed hedges of other financially beneficial relationships, I believe, won out.

Ohhh, a Serial Killer Alligator…

So Primeval‘s about an alligator, huh? How did I not somehow pick up on that during any of the first 400 times I saw its television ads this past week and a half? Kudos for the obfuscation, Touchstone marketers. Well played

Good to see Orlando Jones getting paid, though. Love that guy, especially in the Evolution sequel I sometimes screen in my mind when sitting through something directed by Shawn Levy. Also, hurrah for the presence of Brooke Langton, who was just slammin’ in that cheerleader outfit in The Replacements, opposite Keanu Reeves. Just sayin’…

Hopefully this thing turns a quick, quiet profit, if only for their sake.

Top Ten Films of 2006

film brings us some small measure of harmony. It gives
us commonality
. Whether hooting at Snakes on a Plane, checking our watches during Miami Vice, questioning M. Night Shyamalan’s none-too-subtle messianic impulses in Lady in the Water or laughing at (not with) a ridiculous horror movie like Pulse,
movies are one of our most cherished national avocations. Even if our
own opinions about films vary wildly (and they often do), there’s the
singular experience of a common cultural story, a value seemingly
ingrained in our DNA
. In shared darkness, we can achieve a collective
absorption.

The fact is that the simple act of watching with other
people as the larger-than-life unfolds before us reinforces our
collective dreams and makes them seem attainable, if only for a
fleeting afternoon or evening
. After settling the latest preposterous
squabble, driving the babysitter home or picking up take-out for one,
we may reenter the slipstream of our seemingly pedestrian lives, but we
carry with us trace elements of the belief that things can be
different. Last year was not a watershed year for populist filmmaking,
but there were still plenty of films to get excited about. For the full list and posting, from FilmStew, click here.

DEG Doles Out DVD Honors

The Digital Entertainment Group, a Los Angeles-based,
industry-funded, nonprofit DVD advocacy group, held its annual reception during
the recent International Consumer Electronics Show (CES) to award top honors
for digital entertainment products and retailers
. In presenting its fourth
annual industry awards, the DEG honored Best Buy as the Retailer of the Year.

The DEG also awarded seven honors to acknowledge creative excellence
in DVD titles and high definition packaged media released in the 2006 calendar year.
The judging panel, nominated by the motion picture studio and music company
members of the DEG, consisted of reviewers and industry reporters from trade,
entertainment and daily consumer news organizations. In addition to overall
sound and picture quality, all titles were considered for those features that
best demonstrated the value-added nature of the DVD format.

Buena Vista Home Entertainment’s Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest was awarded the Theatrical
DVD Title of the Year
— for full-length motion pictures that were originally released
for theatrical viewing — while the Catalog DVD Title of the Year prize went
to Warner Home Video’s Superman: The
Ultimate Collection
.

TV DVD Title of the Year went to Image Entertainment’s The Twilight Zone: The Complete Definitive
Collection
; the Direct-to-DVD Title of the Year prize went to Sony Pictures
Home Entertainment’s Final Fantasy VII:
Advent Children
; Paramount Home Entertainment’s Neil Young: Heart of Gold was honored with the Music DVD Title of
the Year prize; Sony Pictures Home Entertainment’s Black Hawk Down took top honors for the Blu-ray Disc Title of the
Year; and Warner Home Video’s Batman
Begins
won HD DVD Title of the Year. For more information, visit www.digitalentertainmentinfo.com.

Helen Mirren Digs on Nudity

So as part of the Oscar campaign for Helen Mirren’s turn in The Queen, 60 Minutes profiled her last night, with Morley Safer reporting on her specialty in playing formidable women. Included in the text wrap-up of the piece, touching on Mirren’s stage roles and early film career, is a dig at “questionable movies that required nudity as much as they did talent,” by which I assume they mean Caligula, but could just have easily meant this year’s Shadowboxer.

Always a rakish interview, Mirren has some fun with Safer. “Yes, I think we should do this interview, both of us, in the nude,” she says. “You’d love it!” While heart palpitations were no doubt recorded in nursing homes across the country, elsewhere younger viewers lept from their couches in preemptive defense.

Dance Camera West (Still) Calls for Entries

The final submission deadline of January 17 lurks just around the corner, as previously mentioned here, so if you think you have anything of merit for Dance Camera West’s summer festival, by all means, get it in, be it long form, short, documentary, installation or “interactive dance media,” whatever the hell that is. The entrance fee ranges from $40-50. For more information, phone (213) 480-8633, and/or click here.

James Gunn Digs Jack Bauer

Some more high-quality blog reading out there comes in the form of writer-director James Gunn’s eponymous site. His list of 25 things he wants for Christmas — addressed to God/Santa Claus/Jesus — is pretty funny, as is his recounting of his recent trip to England with his wife, The Office‘s Jenna Fischer; a lot is made of his disdain for castles and their mutual love of the fifth season of 24. I’ve chatted with Gunn a couple times before, and he’s a cool interview — one of those guys who possess intelligence and enthusiasm in equal measure. Click here for some fun with Gunn. Heck, maybe we’ll even hook something up in the future.

Lucas Confirms Indiana Jones IV for 2008

Well, at least some good came of the accursed Rose Parade. The Hollywood Reporter‘s Gregg Kilday is reporting that George Lucas, who served as this year’s grand marshal of the annual New Year’s Day, flower-powered festival of floats, tipped off the media that he, director Steven Spielberg and Harrison Ford have finally agreed on a screenplay, and that the film should be in theaters in 2008. After seemingly every pedigreed writer out there took a pass at the project, David Koepp’s latest script was given the nod. Start practicing with your bullwhip now…

L.A. Weekly Film Critics Poll 2006

The first annual L.A. Weekly film critics poll — in which I was asked to participate — has announced its results, based on your typical inverted-point scoring system, and the findings of course offer a fascinating look back at the year of 2006, and plenty of grist for the mill depending on whatever one wishes to argue.

First off, hearty props go out to the erudite Scott Foundas for the marshalling of effort and resources involved. It’s hard to believe it’s the first such undertaking on the part of the 800-pound gorilla that is the L.A. Weekly, but as a former writing, forever hard-charging editor-in-chief myself, I can sympathize with the extra amount of work and time it involves at a time of year that offers precious little breathing room.

Now, some fleeting, on-the-fly analysis: the Top 10 films are an interesting collection, and further proof, in case you needed it, that we film critcs are a wonkish bunch. As far as forward-looking awards prognostication, you can throw out half of the bunchJean-Pierre Melville’s Army of Shadows, as well as Three Times, The Death of Mr. LazarescuL’Enfant and David Lynch’s Inland Empire, which garnered more than five times as many mentions as Babel. You can unfortunately probably do the same for Paul Greengrass’ brilliant United 93; there’s simply too much old guard resistance to it amongst Academy Award voters, especially those residing in New York City.

Borat was an inspired inclusion at #9, and it was heartening — in its own special way — to see Dreamgirls place… drumroll, please… #66, with only two critical mentions. This reinforces the notion that the movie, its crowd-pleasing elements notwithstanding, is chiefly a collection of performances (Jennifer Hudson’s strident belting, Eddie Murphy’s “James Brown in a hot-tub,” etc.) in search of some believable hurt or love, particularly in its third act.

Best Actor was a tie between Ryan Gosling (Half Nelson) and Sacha Baron Cohen (Borat). Best Actress was Helen Mirren in a runaway, though Laura Dern polled surprisingly strong for Inland Empire, with twice as many tallied points as the next runner-up, Judi Dench (Notes on a Scandal). Best Supporting Actor went to Jackie Earle Haley for Little Children and, in another tie, The Death of Mr. Lazarescu‘s Luminita Gheorghiu and Half Nelson‘s Shareeka Epps placed even in points for Best Supporting Actress, though the former had one more ballot mention. In another great year for non-fiction films, in a vote I could scarcely agree with less, Darwin’s Nightmare took the nod for Best Documentary.

For a list of winners in the category of Best Film, click here, and then toggle around to the listings for the other categories; for my ballot of the moment, click here.

Ahh, Harold & Kumar…

Borat and Jackass Number Two have been (rightly, if amusingly) getting from critics’ groups in their year-end handouts — the latter at least in the voting if not the actual final awards — made me glancingly reflect back on the charms of 2004’s Harold & Kumar Go To White Castle.

From Kal Penn (above, left) and John Cho’s perfectly pitched performances and Neil Patrick Harris’ brilliant cameo as himself to some of the wickedly zonked dialogue (“Shotgun anus!”) and that inspired fantasy sequence involving a giant bag of weed, Harold & Kumar ranks as one of the best willfully “dumb,” smoke-’em-if-you-got-’em comedies of the past decade. Sure it hits all the requisite beats, but it also puts a fresh, frequently anarchic twist on things, which more movies could stand to learn from. Here’s hoping that long-gestating sequel eventually gets off the ground.

On Screening Schedules and Studio Lot Security Guards

So I don’t want to be a complete little pissy bitch, but awards season is of course upon us, so there are not only myriad reviews to write but also Best of 2006 lists to start considering and, more pressingly, awards voting deadlines. And it’s confounding and quite irritating, some of the incompetence and outright… well, let’s say conflicting stories one encounters in pursuing all sorts of screening schedules. It’s certainly interesting, in a bemusing sort of way, to see which
studios actively court and/or welcome critical reception, and on which films.

The words “Do you know who I am?” shall never pass my lips, I promise, but as an accredited member of the Los Angeles Film Critics Association I really don’t think I should have this much trouble seeing, let’s say, Dreamgirls. Receiving an all-media screening invitation after the date(s) of said screenings is one thing. Arriving straight from driving across town from another screening, five minutes in advance of an appointed time to a screening which you RSVPed to earlier in the week (and received email confirmation), only to be told that the screening is full and closed is… well, frustrating.

More irritating, though, are smug, officious and/or unhelpful studio lot security guards. I’ve got absolutely no beef with the normal working man (or woman), believe me. But some of these folks are officially on my shit list. And when I say I “some,” I might be talking about folks at Warner Bros. When one courteously inquires as to whether someone from the publicity department — someone working a screening on the lot, someone 30 to 40 yards away — can be contacted to help resolve a matter, and is met with both a dismissiveness and rudeness that continually fails to address said specific question, well, I take affront at that, since after all I’m merely attempting to execute my occupational duty, ostensibly just like you. Through your own ineptitude, you help escalate the situation, actually.

In the spirit of the holidays, I’ll refrain from wishing you a flaming sack of shit for your top-shelf douchebaggery, mustachioed WB lot officer. What’s that… I already typed it? Oh well. What’re you gonna do? I can’t seem to find that backspace key. Merry Christmas!

Roger Michell on Corinne Bailey Rae

Corinne Bailey Rae is already making a name for herself Stateside, but upscale arthouse film audiences — the type of folks who gobble up CD offerings from Starbucks — will get to know her a bit better over the coming months in director Roger Michell’s Venus. A number of songs from her eponymous debut album — plus an extra track or two — rather surprisingly dot the film’s soundtrack, including adult contemporary FM hit “Put Your Records On.”

“It
arrived late in the day,” says Michell of Bailey Rae’s placement in the film. “I’d never heard of her when we were making the film. I’d
laid up a lot of quite serious classical music on the temp score… music full of
strings that I knew wasn’t quite right
. And then my 10-year-old daughter
insisted that I buy her this CD that we then played on a long journey to
Wales, and by the time we arrived I’d sort of worked out where I could fit all
these songs that seemed to fit so wonderfully within the tone of the movie. [That music] sort of handed the film
back to (the character of) Venus, it’s her music. And then I met Corinne and she wrote some
incidental music. She’s also a Northerner, too, a young woman in her 20s from
up north who came to London and
has really arrived.”

Val Kilmer, Funny Again?

Adam Goldberg called it. I bumped into the character actor recently, and in the context of chatting a bit about his experience on Deja Vu, asked about the ball of contradictions that is Val Kilmer. Goldberg insisted Kilmer was a pleasure on set, and related that the notoriously short-tempered star — whose antics have over the years cost him both some jobs and some friends — had said, “I’ve been on good behavior for my last five movies.” (I don’t know where, exactly, that places the last freakout, but somewhere before Kiss Kiss Bang Bang.)

Goldberg said Kilmer was in good spirits and quite funny, and now comes bubbling rumor that Kilmer may in fact be looking to reprise his role from 1985’s Real Genius as wonked-out science prodigy Chris Knight. That’d be something, huh? The overriding personal memory of that movie for me is of a buddy who rented it from Blockbuster and ran up like an $80 late fee tab, leading to much clucking disapproval from said store’s manager. Nothing official has yet been announced, but Kilmer allegedly wants, a la Robert De Niro, to trade in (and off of) his hardassed persona for a few overtly commercial, wide release comedies. If true, can a Top Secret! sequel be far behind? After all, The Good German gives the Zuckers plenty of new (old) material with which to work.

How Long Do Turtles Live, Again?

For those looking to perhaps score a quick trivia victory, according to press notes for Rocky Balboa, the two turtles who were probably Rocky’s best friends at the start of the first picture, Cuff and Link, come out of retirement to reprise their roles in the current film.

Roger Michell Nixes 007 Offer

During recent interviews for Venus, director Roger Michell talked some about new James Bond Daniel Craig, with whom he made 2003’s Mother, and is slated to do another picture… but not an entry in the 007 franchise.

“I very nearly committed to doing
the next Bond movie, and at the final moment I decided not to,” says Michell
. “I just felt that
[while] it sounds like an enormous amount of fun, when you look at it
closely it’s a huge, massive supertanker, and to nudge it half a degree off its
prescribed course takes superhuman effort
. And I felt that it was probably more
difficult than I initially thought to do that. We couldn’t really agree on how
the script should develop, that’s the easy answer.”

This means bad news and a likely tough decision for Martin Campbell, who in addition to directing Casino Royale helmed 1995’s Bond entry GoldenEye, plus The Mask of Zorro and its 2005 sequel, The Legend of Zorro. A stereotypical-but-true close friend of a friend swears Campbell — no spring chicken at 66 years of age — would love to beg off another Bond effort and spend his remaining occupational capital and the last few years of his professional life making more personal fare, perhaps like 2003’s Beyond Borders. Expect Bond producer Barbara Broccoli et al, however, to push for that time-honored “one last job.” The money may be too good, who knows…

Olivia’s Wilde Brow

Turistas, let’s take a moment to appreciate the particular charms of Olivia Wilde (above). I’m usually not too big a fan of the overly manufactured/tweezed eyebrow, but here it works. I know the devilish temptress stuff only worked so long for Rose McGowan, but this is totally the niche Wilde should be exploiting, no? She’s younger, and once her teen marriage to flamenco player/documentary filmmaker Tao Ruspoli invariably unravels, she’ll be even hotter. Save Angelina Jolie, is there a better feminine arched brow working in movies today?

Celebrity Idiocy

One thing I’ve never understood about celebrities — if you’re going to cheat on a spouse, why in God’s name would you do anything in public? You have to know that you’re going to be seen and recognized. Conversely, if you’re not laying the groundwork for adultery (and hey, then kudos to you), wouldn’t you know that canoodling and such with another celeb would likely be misconstrued, and thus endeavor to avoid even the appearance of impropriety? I say this because Taye Diggs and Ashlee Simpson… are apparently… (at least) friends? What!?

That’s nearly as strange as Jennifer Lopez attending Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes’ nuptials, which I still can’t figure out. I mean, is Cruise a big, closeted Maid in Manhattan fan, or did he think The Wedding Planner was a documentary?