Sex and Death 101

In 1989, Winona Ryder appeared alongside Christian Slater in Heathers,
written by Daniel Waters and directed by Michael Lehman, and the result
was akin to a bunker-penetrating bombshell — something that bore
results with a bit of time. A darkly comedic attack on the cozy pieties present in most teen flicks, Heathers — an even more wickedly canted take-down of adolescent social cliques than its most recent descendant, Mean Girls
— assayed popularity, teen suicide and downright sociopathic behavior
with equal, cold-water-to-the-face irreverence. Though the film grossed
only a bit above $1 million in theaters, it became a sensation in the
rental and nascent sell-thru market — the very definition of a cult
hit.

Sex and Death 101
represents a reunion between Ryder and Waters. And while she isn’t the
lead, per se, it is the most many fans will have had an opportunity to
see from a “real” Ryder in some time, after several indie flicks, a
small role in the anthology comedy The Ten and a prominent role in Richard Linklater’s rotoscope-animated A Scanner Darkly.
Weird, funny, engaging and spiritedly thoughtful even if not always
successful, the pairing seems to celebrate a certain reunion of like
minds
.

Waters’ first film behind the camera since 2001’s Happy Campers, his only other directing credit, Sex and Death 101 centers around Roderick Blank (Something Different‘s
Simon Baker), a successful advertising executive who, just weeks before
his marriage to Fiona (Julie Bowen), gets a mysterious email that
contains the names of everyone he’s ever had or will have sex with, 101 women in
total
. The rub is that it doesn’t end with his wife-to-be — in fact,
she’s nowhere near the last name. In the midst of this “sacrilegious
epiphany,” and finding no relief from a trio of bizarro-world
comptrollers (Robert Wisdom, Patton Oswalt and Tanc Sade) from whom the
list originated, Roderick throws himself headlong into the sheer,
delicious variety (centerfolds, bisexual astronauts) of his predicted
future, but soon finds matters dulled without the thrill of the chase,
and even worse when a new, true love (Leslie Bibb) turns out not to be
on the list. All this is crosscut with and eventually complicated by,
meanwhile, the story of a woman, known only as “Death Nell” (Ryder),
who’s gaining a media following as a murderous femme fatale, putting
all sorts of bad men in comas.

From start to conclusion, Sex and Death 101
is an exercise in wheel-spinning hijinks much more than any analysis.
(“I’m sure there’s some logical explanation for all this, but I’m not
going to wait around for it,” says Roderick at one point.) Waters has
in the past described his personal sensibility as “Bunuel meets Caddyshack,” and that description aptly captures some of the wild tonal shifts that mark Sex and Death 101
— a movie that includes a gross-out bait-and-switch reminiscent of
Stifler’s clandestine closet hook-up in American Wedding, but also
sincere questions and insight about the existential crises to be found
in knowing beforehand one’s lovers (and, by extension, non-lovers). How
much of life, and the appropriation of our time, is in pursuit or
purchase of these tangible acts? While Baker is the lens through which
the story is told, Ryder is its scythe-bearing, no-BS conscience
, and a
late diner scene in particular offers up powerful proof of (no pun
intended here) her ability to kill softly.

In the end, Sex and Death 101
isn’t so much profound in and of itself as it is a fun, sloppy
treatment of a profoundly interesting premise
. It’s a movie that feels like it should
be reverse-adapted into a book. As a reunion project between Waters and
Ryder, though, it feels right, leaving one wanting for thirds. For the
full original review, from FilmStew, click here. (Anchor Bay/Avenue Pictures, R, 116 minutes)

One thought on “Sex and Death 101

  1. I found this to be the best movie I’ve seen in quite some time… And I watch a movie every night.

    A lot of people had problems with it, but all these people were snobs who had expectations, or who whine when a movie doesn’t meet their perception of what should happen.

    Some people whine about things not being explained, or that there was a lack of analysis in the movie.

    Umm… If you want analysis, you should be watching documentaries. Movies are for telling stories and entertaining people, and that’s what this did.

    They took a “What If?” question — and I LOVE those — and made it into a far better movie than I would ever have expected.

Comments are closed.