Not exactly breaking news, but if there’s any doubt that George W. Bushis increasingly seen as both an instigator of more worldwide
peril than a quelling force, it should be noted that more and more celebrities
aren’t even bothering to speak in vagaries and deeply coded niceties about political parallels and
allusions in entertainment product.
“There’s just something about shadow governments and
conspiracy and patriotism gone wrong that feels very contemporary, and strikes
a nerve,” says Shooter
director Antoine Fuqua in the EPK materials for the project. “We may be talking
about a cover-up in a small foreign village that has some small but extractive
wealth,” adds costars Danny Glover. “These people refuse to move, and they’re
dealt with. But it’s a pattern that happens. These things happen all the time
these days.”
I had a chance to speak with composer Tyler Bates recently, about his work on 300, and the subject of Rob Zombie’s Halloween reboot — for which Bates is also providing the music — came up. Bates has worked with Zombie before, and had some interesting things to say about their working style, his take on the script and tackling such an iconic score.
“Rob came to me when I believe the Weinsteins first tapped
him to see if he would be interested in making a Halloween movie,” says Bates. “Rob gave me his idea for the script and he asked
my opinion of it, which I appreciated, and then asked if I would mock up our
version of the theme for a presentation to the studio. So we had a dialogue
going, and through The Devil’s Rejects
we had definitely creatively bonded immediately. Rob pretty much leaves me to
my own devices, musically. He doesn’t really speak in musical terms to me about
anything. And that’s probably because as an artist and a musician himself he
knows it would be horrible to have your A&R guy saying, ‘Yeah, write
another one like “Living Dead Girl.”’ You know that’s not going to be so good.”
“Going into Halloween
I’ve had the opportunity to develop a palette of sounds that are going to be
applicable to the film, texturally,” Bates adds. “And being very familiar with Rob’s filming
style, and the script, and having taken a look at a couple of examples of
cinematography that reflect the attitude he wants to capture for the film, it’s
given me a lot of info. He’s in his third week of filming right now. I imagine
that I’ll start looking at an assembly of dailies next week. Rob lives pretty
close by, and so we’ll have a chance to get together and talk. Rob’s visual
style is so intense that the music really has to become part of the film
itself. It can’t accompany the film, it has to become part of the fiber of the film itself. That’s the challenge.”
“As far as the Halloween
aspect goes, first off I think he’s written a great script,” continues Bates. “He’s telling the
story, in my opinion, in a way that fans are really going to love. …And one of
the pleasures of getting a chance to do this movie is getting a chance to do
the John Carpenter theme, but kind of get back to the way that Carpenter did
it — at least that attitude. There’s not going to be a sweeping, orchestral
version of the theme happening. This is hopefully going to be the most
disturbing version ever created. That’s our objective, to really get into the
darkest corners of your mind, and I feel that Rob is definitely going to
accomplish that, in a really classic way. I think you’re going to see this
movie as something that really delivers on a psychological level and a dramatic
level. It’s probably going to be violent as hell, I’m sure, but that’s not his
main point.”
It seems Ioan Gruffudd (above, second from left) got in trouble with 20th Century Fox a while back for saying that Galactus wasn’t part of Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer, the sequel to 2005’s $330 million-grossing worldwide comic book superhero hit.
Since then, however, director Tim Story has more or less confirmed that the appearance of fan favorite Galactus would come in the third act, feeding into a storyline for a potential third film in the series. Still, during interviews for the forthcoming The TV Set, from writer-director Jake Kasdan, the charming, easygoing Gruffudd isn’t taking too many chances, and he’s clearly having to fight the impulse of sharing more. “Yes, yes, yes,” he says with a smile, responding to the scenario as laid out above. “And I’ll add that whatever Tim says is correct.”
Gruffudd does offer that the cast is doing two or three days of re-shoots on the film this weekend, but it’s less work than on the first movie, which he says is “a good sign. And in this film I’m more masculine and in control… I’m not floundering about.”
And are the re-shoots in Los Angeles or do they involve outdoor location work up north in Vancouver? Gruffudd almost answers, then catches himself, and shakes a finger disapprovingly. “You’ll be there with your bloody camera, won’t you, looking for Galactus!”
Hollywood prides itself on reinvention. After all, it has plenty of experience in
neatly packaging such tales of underdog uplift, personal transformation
and professional rebirth, selling them to the public in compact,
pre-formed celluloid patties 12 months a year.
The career trajectory of
Mark Wahlberg, though, has been a particularly unusual one, and a
lesson in the art of the makeover. From successful if unlikely Bahs-ton-born hip-hop musician to roughneck (and allegedly homophobic) Calvin Klein underwear model to hipster Entourage
producer and, now, Oscar nominee, Wahlberg’s acting career might best
be described as a blue-collar shooting star. It’s been characterized by
a solemn, hard-edged determination, commitment to professionalism and
incremental betterment. So it’s no surprise that Shooter, his latest film, finds him playing an idealistic ex-military man who has to take matters into his own hands. Whether in Boogie Nights, Rock Star, Four Brothers or I Heart Huckabees, Wahlberg is at his best when he’s able to showcase his convictions, to convey the depth and strength of his beliefs. For the full interview feature, from FilmStew, click here.
Sporting a thin, black, cashmere sweater pulled over a dress shirt, Chris Rock — chatting in a Beverly Hills hotel suite a week before his new movie’s release — is every bit the picture of buttoned-up domesticity that he chafes
against in I Think I Love My Wife, based loosely on French auteur Eric Rohmer’s Chloe in the Afternoon, but also given a suburban pinch of Woody Allen’s angsty New York flavoring.
The film, Rock’s second directorial outing, is a small and somewhat personal one, and what might be considered a tough sell to most of his fans. Less than two weeks into its wide release, it’s made just over $10 million. As to the question of whether fans of Rock’s forcefully delivered stand-up comedy want to see him bottled up in a swallowed dramedy of temptation, the answer appears to be no, mostly not.
More interesting, though, is the question of how does one break the news to their mate that they’re “artistically exploring” infidelity and/or desertion — or, in the
extreme case of rapper Eminem and his hit single “Stan,” outright homicide — in proactive, creative form? “As a comedian, I can’t think about everything I say,” Rock says with a shrug. “I’m
out of the concern business. I just do what I do. I’m not Picasso, but
I’m sure he didn’t worry about getting the floor dirty, [going] ‘I need
a drop-cloth!’”
This one isn’t mine, but rather from the Writers Guild of America site: Shooter screenwriter Jonathan Lemkin talks to writer Peter Rader (Waterworld) about why he wrote seven different endings for his adaptation of Stephen Hunter’s novel Point of Impact, as well as how Ned Beatty’s character inadvertently turned into Vice President Dick Cheney(without quite blasting an old guy in the face with buckshot). Some interesting stuff, particularly about Paramount excitedly pumping money into the project, but how that begat even more changes. For the audio file of the chat, click here.
300 — a stirring, violent and visually audacious tale of battlefield sacrifice — has focused on cinematographer Larry Fong’s rotoscoped, consistently evocative camerawork. And rightly so — the movie’s saturated frames and rich shadows look and feel like a comic panel come to life, and feed its brawny, heightened tone. Composer Tyler Bates‘ driving, aggressive music, though, reflects the characters’ physical vigor as well as their steadfast dedication to principle.
I had the chance recently to speak with Bates about his second collaboration with Dawn of the Dead director Snyder, his overall career path and the challenges of tackling iconic properties. For the full interview feature, from Rotten Tomatoes, click here. To visit Bates’ eponymous website, meanwhile, click here.
Hip-hop artist, actor, mini-mogul-in-training — Bow Wow doesn’t
need anyone to throw him a bone. In honor of his 20th birthday, then, here’s a slightly redacted reposting of an interview done from the fall of 2005, on occasion of the theatrical release of Roll Bounce. To wit:
There used to be a day when actors wanted only to be actors.
That day is no more. There used to be a day when singers wanted only to be
singers. That day is no more. There used to be a day when actor-singers wanted
merely to be actor-singers. That day is no more.
And there used to be a day when performers who formerly, and
formally, had the designation “Lil’” in front of their name would be happy to
escape adolescence with a trust fund intact. That day, too, is no more. Yes, in an interview in advance of his new
period skate movie Roll Bounce, Bow
Wow is telling me that he wants to put Will Smith out of business. And he’s not
entirely kidding.
In breathless fashion, multimedia army-of-one Bow Wow
relates anecdotes about his recently completed music tour, his upcoming film
projects, various endorsement deals, the self-starring reality show he’d like
to launch on his own terms (“I think if I had mine it’d be crazy, you’d never
see nothing like this”) and, yes, plans for
his own clothing line. Probably one of the most preternaturally confident —
cocky? — of the under-drinking age set in Hollywood
today, Bow Wow is a relentless talker and self-promoter, and unnervingly on
point. (If none of his entertainment ventures stick, he could in a decade segue
into politics, where his cult of personality would find welcome reception.)
Yet Bow Wow has a unique
combination of experience and basic insight that could serve him well, and
together give him just as much of a puncher’s chance as anyone else looking to
rapaciously climb the Hollywood ladder. Ask him why rappers today feel the need
to brand themselves with such a wide variety of lifestyle accoutrements, and he’ll launch into a soliloquy about the genre’s high relatability amongst
today’s kids and how fans therefore want to also feel like they own a piece of
their favorite hip-hop stars — or even athletes — outside of music or off the
court. It’s a bit broad strokes but nonetheless perceptive. Bow Wow is no dum
dum, in other words.
Bow Wow first came to fame as the preteen protégé of
rapper-producer Jermaine Dupri, who continues to serve as his musical mentor. His
debut album, Beware of Dog, sold over
three million copies and spawned the hit “Bounce With Me,” which touched number
one on both the rap and R&B charts. He then made his feature film debut in Like Mike, and was most recently seen
opposite Cedric the Entertainer in Johnson
Family Vacation.
Setting one’s sights on Will Smith, though, requires a bit
broader palette, and so Bow Wow began looking for something with a bit more
heft to it. It was then that he heard of Roll
Bounce, a script by television writer Norman Vance (Beauty Shop) that Malcolm Lee (Undercover
Brother, The Best Man) had
expressed an interest in directing. “What attracted me to the film was the
storyline,” says Bow Wow, “and especially that is was something completely
different than anything I’ve done before. I really wanted to broaden my career
as an actor, and this role was a great way to take it further.”
The film’s story, set in a music-cued 1970s, centers around
Xavier “X” Smith (Bow Wow). At a time when rollerskating was a way of life, X
and his pals ruled supreme. When their local rink closes, however, it sends
these decidedly downtown kids into terra
unfamilia — an uptown rink known as Sweetwater — where they face off
against a collection of flamboyant over-the-top skaters. Along the way, there’s
a budding romance with the sweet Naomi (Meagan Good) and a therapeutic healing
in X’s relationship with his father Curtis (Chi McBride).
“I’ve been skating for years so this wasn’t really anything
new to me,” says Bow Wow. “I’ve been skating since I was around six years old.
I used to waste my mother’s money all the time, just playing games at the
arcade. And then she was like, ‘Nah, get on out there.’ So it was cool, it
brought back some memories.”
“The routines and the choreography were really the only
thing that I had to learn,” Bow Wow continues. “That took a few weeks. A lot of
us, we’re not dancers, a lot of us don’t have rhythm, so it was cool to get
everybody together and just try to do it. People were falling, some folks
couldn’t get it, some could. But we had to wait, and work together, because we
were a team and we had to move as a unit.”
While the nostalgic underpinnings and familial drama of Roll Bounce make it almost as much of a
“glance-back” movie for adults as a funky comedy of choreographed good times, the
assortment of supporting player cameos (Nick Cannon, Charlie Murphy, Mike Epps,
DMX, Wayne Brady) adds further color and flair. Bow Wow also asserts that young
and old can appreciate the artistic showmanship of rollerskating. He acknowledges
the ascendancy of rollerblades, but points out the existence of Los Angeles’ World
on Wheels and other local skating rinks, saying there’s still a healthy
underground appetite for the type of “jam skating” on display in Roll Bounce. “Rollerblades are
definitely used for exercise and things like that,” says Bow Wow. “But when
it’s time for you to skate and really show off what you’ve got, then it’s four
wheels.”
Bow Wow will soon get a chance to get to know other types of
four-wheel modes of transportation as well, as he and Lucas Black (Sling Blade, Friday Night Lights) are set to co-star in the third installment of the Fast and the Furious franchise,
set in Tokyo. Shooting commences on
location in October — “I’ve never been [to Japan], so that’ll be all new,
different,” he says — and though Bow Wow is as of yet uncertain as to what, if
any, sort of driving school training he’ll have, don’t be too surprised if you soon
see his endorsement of an auto body professional. Or a tire company, or a rim
specialist…
Jim Carrey is nothing if not dogged in his pursuit of well-roundedness.
While plenty of actors have been only too happy to trade on the
well-fed contentedness of their big screen personalities, and merely
flip their careers into cruise control (a certain Dreamgirls Oscar nominee comes to mind), Carrey has for more than a decade shown a penchant for
dancing on the razor’s edge. Broad comedies are his forte, but he
clearly yearns for embrace — commercially as much as critically — in
dramatic fare as well, as The Truman Show, The Majestic, Man on the Moon and now his choice to headline the recent The Number 23 all illustrate.
“I really have always thought of myself as somebody who lives in the
middle of the wheel, and is able to go to the extreme, to the outside
of the wheel, in any direction,” says Carrey. “The best case scenario for me is to
be able to be centered and then go out. You can be zany
and funny or you can do something that really has some depth to it and
is serious …I would
hate to get trapped in one little thing. I always feel like funny is an
appendage, but it is not my whole body.” For the full feature interview, from FilmStew, click here.
Richard Parsons called me into his office and said, ‘Mr. Howard, I do not know what your private life is like, but your public persona is on a par with Senator Barack (Obama).’ He said, ‘I want you to talk with Quincy.’ So I left his office and went to see Quincy Jones. He said talk to her… as a human being, as a friend. That’s what we’re supposed to do. The media may attack, but my responsibility is to this black woman who has established something amazing [and] opened up doors for other people, and my responsibility is to my elders, so if they say, ‘Do this, do that,’ I’m going to listen to them. I’m going to keep my friendship with her, and hopefully one day people will be able to remember her contributions and stop remembering her only for her faults.”
Bobby. Granted, the film kind of fizzled, but maybe it will see new life on DVD when it bows on April 10. The below may read as a bit of a rant, but what’s wrong with that? I can tell you it was certainly earnest and sincere. And if three-quarters of folks Jackson’s age had this sort of passion about political involvement — regardless of points-of-view — I’d feel a lot better about the future.
“The 1960s were a transformational time in American history, and it was actually a very small part of the population that caused the greatest change. The student movement was not a popular movement. It was popular amongst students. The civil rights movement was not a popular movement. It was a small group of true believers who affected some of the most positive changes. The Voting Rights Act is one of the greatest pieces of legislation in American history — we came to actually believe in our own ideals when that was passed. So I think in listening to (Robert F. Kennedy), and that speech that plays over the end credits, if that doesn’t motivate you and inspire you to want to become involved in the political process, I just don’t know what can. I think we’ve turned politics into a dirty word: ‘Oh, he’s being so political with that,’ or ‘Oh, they’re just playing politics.’ Well we’re all playing politics. You fill up your car, you’re playing politics. You breathe your air, you’re playing politics. They take a chunk out of you every April. That’s playing politics. These are direct decisions that we get to effect as American citizens, because this is our country. It’s ours to do with as we please. And I wish I’d come up with this line, but you only get the democracy that you deserve.”
Of all the myriad, funnily named crayons in the jumbo-sized Crayola
boxes that graced the grubby, communal tables of musty, elementary
after-school programs, I remember the hue for “Burnt Sienna” with
unerring clarity. A ruddy mixture of orange, brown and red, it recalled
the type of thick clay found around Eastern seaboard construction sites — the sort that would streak and stain pavement with the rain, leaving
thick tire marks of accompaniment for blocks in either direction. And
if you accidentally stepped in it and didn’t soon find a wet patch of
grass to work it off your shoe, well, it was bound to travel with you
and then leave its mark on your parents’ or friends’ carpet.
Similarly, Factory Girl actress Sienna Miller leaves a distinctive mark. A rising starlet who
first made her name — or, more accurately, had it foisted upon her — as
Jude Law’s girlfriend, initially onscreen in Alfie,
then offscreen and throughout the tabloids, Miller is now making her
way in Hollywood sans romantic entanglements, thank you very much. Or
trying to, at least. For the full feature interview, from FilmStew, click here.
The
Number 23, opening February 23 from New Line. There, amidst the usual
questions of character, career trajectory and, yes, hairstyle (he’s currently sporting
a longish, shoulder-length mane), Carrey was peppered with queries about Valentine’s
Day, past and present. He hemmed and hawed a bit, but was finally goaded into a
reflection in order to stave off specifics of this year’s celebration with current
beau Jenny McCarthy. His response? Classic.
“You know, I remember a lot of Valentine’s Days having to
act, and that’s a horrible thing to feel,” said Carrey. “I think Valentine’s
Day should be a moving thing — it should pop up when you feel the most loving.
But because it’s a set thing with a date, it doesn’t coincide with how people
feel most of the time.”
Factory Girl, Sienna Miller (above left, with Charlie Cox) talked a bit about the forthcoming fantasy adventure movie Stardust, which reunites her with her Layer Cake director, Matthew Vaughn.
“He just phoned me up, out of the blue, and said, ‘Listen,
there’s this little part in my new film. Will you come and do it?’ And I wasn’t
working so I said sure,” recollects Miller. “I only worked on it for two weeks, and I play this
horrible girl.” Here Miller laughs. “Well she’s not that bad, but she’s the catalyst for Charlie
Cox’s character, who I had also worked with on Casanova, so it was a no-brainer
to do it… She decides that she wants a shooting star, and she makes him go
across into the Wonderland to get it. She’s quite bossy and demanding and not
very warm. But it was a cameo, and it was fun.”
the news last week that the Motion Picture Association of America is making crucial changes to its charter, and finally providing at least a little transparency. The move is partially shaped by Kirby Dick’s documentary This Film Is Not Yet Rated, new to DVD this week, about the Neapolitan swirl of secrecy and hypocrisy surrounding the ratings board and its secretive system of classification. While far, far from perfect, the movie is certainly an entertaining one, if also intellectually lazy.
“The reason there is secrecy is so that people can’t critique the system — that they don’t understand it and know where to begin a critique of it,” argues Dick. “I think the MPAA basically doesn’t care whether or not there’s a ratings system or not, but if there’s going to be one they want to control it, because they want to make sure that their films get the least restrictive rating, so that they can make the most money.”For the full interview/feature from FilmStew — including a tidbit about Jane Fonda’s legendarily orgasmic writhing in Coming Home, and what it might foretell when combined with the forthcoming changes in classification appeals — click here.
The Oscar campaign for Sienna Miller’s lead turn as doomed
socialite and Andy Warhol gal-pal Edie Sedgwick in the Weinstein
Company’s Factory Girl never really gained traction, but the
film is finally seeing its overdue release this week, and cast and crew
alike are out in full support of it, hoping to catch some gulf-stream
momentum amongst the elite film press out there already tired of
talking about the Dreamgirls Oscar non-nominations.
I’ll have much more on the movie in the coming days, but thought it
would be interesting to kick things off with director George
Hickenlooper’s thoughts on his paparazzi-hounded star (below). To wit:
Paul Giamatti or Brian Posehn, depending on the budget. “It was Natalie Portman, Kate Hudson, the whole shebang. Brittany Murphy gave an insane audition, which was amazing. Selma Blair gave an amazing audition. Lots of great actresses gave auditions. Then (producer) Holly Wiersma called me from the Venice Film Festival, and said she had this great actress, Sienna Miller, who just finished Casanova with Lasse Hallstrom. A couple months later I’m in a casting meeting at Endeavor, my agency, and come across this headshot of this blonde girl with this slightly insouciant, sardonic smile. I’m thinking, ‘Wow, it’s a young Julie Christie.’ I look on the back, and it’s Sienna Miller. I hadn’t seen anything she’d done, so I got a tape of Keen Eddie, and I thought it was OK. It didn’t really blow me away. But something about her headshot struck a chord with me. I kept thinking about her. And then her name came up a couple weeks again, she was flying into town. I said, ‘Let’s audition her.’ So the audition was at 3 o’clock, and I had to catch a plane at six. Three o’clock rolls around, then 4 o’clock, and I’m thinking, ‘Where is this Sienna Miller, where the hell is she?’ So I get on the phone to try to find her, I’m furious… and then literally, right as I’m about to walk out, Sienna walks in and is like, ‘Ohmigod, I’m so sorry, my towncar got lost, and I just flew in from London…'”
“And, I mean, people are always apologetic, but I was just completely blown away by her discombobulated, self-effacing manner. It was explosively charismatic, and it took my breath away. You have that experience with some women that you meet, but it wasn’t a sexual thing at all. The energy was just very powerful. …And she just read off the page, and I was startled by how good of an audition it was. I felt like Edie Sedgwick, or at least my perception of her, was being channeled from some other world. …So as I was sitting in the plane on the taxiway I got on my phone — even after they’d said to shut off your cell phone — and called Holly and said, ‘I want Sienna, she’s the one.’ So that’s how it happened. It had nothing to do with anything else other than her audition.”
The obligatory “early jobs” question gives way to this response from Brad Pitt: “I had a job driving strippers around… my job was to drive them to bachelor parties and things. I’d pick them up, and at the gig I’d collect the money, play the bad Prince tapes and catch the girls’ clothes. It was not a wholesome atmosphere, and it got very depressing. After two months I went in to quit, and the guy said, ‘Listen, I’ve got this one last gig tonight.’ So I did it, and this girl — I’d never met her before — was in an acting class taught by a man named Roy London [a famous acting coach]. I went and checked it out, and it really set me on the path to where I am now.”
Ahh, yet another reason to love Pitt: his disarming penchant for candor, even as the most paparazzi-hounded star on the planet. For the rest of the full, lively conversation — which also includes Cate Blanchett, Forest Whitaker, Penelope Cruz, Helen Mirren and Leonardo DiCaprio — click here.
Writer-director-turned-burgeoning actor Kevin Smith was making press rounds recently for Catch and Release, and took some time to talk about his involvement in the fourth installment of the Die Hard franchise, Live Free and Die Hard.
“I’m the only person in Die Hard who talks and doesn’t shoot
somebody,” says Smith, somewhat predictably, of his role. “It’s that
role in the action movie where you provide a bunch of information that
they need to head into act three. …This could all change, mind you. By the time they get in
the editing room, they might be like, ‘He sucked. Yank him out.’ But as
it stands now, in the script and as I shot it, they talk about me a lot
and then you finally meet me. And I provide a lot of information about
the villain.”
“What’s nice about working on those big God-awful, expensive Hollywood
movies is that they have so many writers they don’t even notice if
you’re one of them,” Smith continues. “So I got there and I was just like, ‘I wrote myself
a one-page monologue,’ and I got to deliver it. It was hysterical. Like,
they let me do it. Bruce Willis is like, ‘Dude, that’s a good speech.’
And so, you know, they totally went for it. So that was kind of cool. …They were kind of
riff-friendly, but there was one motto they kept
saying, which was, ‘Keep it Die Hard.’ So you can’t get in there and do a Jay and Silent Bob-type
monologue. You have to kind of make it germane to the movie. So I don’t
wind up giving a funny speech. I wind up giving a very paranoid
Joe-Pesci-in-JFK-type speech, which was fun.”
Always a rakish interview, Mirren has some fun with Safer. “Yes, I think we should do this interview, both of us, in the nude,” she says. “You’d love it!” While heart palpitations were no doubt recorded in nursing homes across the country, elsewhere younger viewers lept from their couches in preemptive defense.
they don’t involve Planet Hollywood (that I know of). Yes, I’m talking about the fourth installment of the Rambo franchise — Pearl of the Cobra… or In the Serpent’s Eye… or Eye of the Tiger, or whatever the hell they’re calling it today. In the press rounds for Rocky Balboa recently, he took the time to talk about his vision for the film, which he’s informally slated to direct. To wit:
“Rambo’s a very interesting character, especially set today,” says Stallone.
“We haven’t seen anything like Rambo, and I’m always interested in characters of
that curious stature — you wonder, why did Rambo become so big? And so to me it’s
worth revisiting, especially the way that the world is today. He’s a character totally
out of sync with everything. He’s a warrior, he’s an errant knight with nowhere
to go. …(In the story), he lives in the jungles of Thailand,
and is in complete denial of [who] he really is. A situation comes along where these
Christians have to go into some very dangerous areas, and he becomes their guide.
And then he reverts to his true nature and he doesn’t like it, but it’s who he is.”
“I’m going to try to work in there all these different
levels about human nature and mankind, the fight within yourself while you’re
trying to fight on the outside,” Stallone continues. “I always love that duality. There’s always two
stories being played out in a good characterization — the one that’s being
played out on the outside and then the dialogue that the character is having within himself. And if
you have three stories going, you really have it going on.”
The first annual L.A. Weekly film critics poll — in which I was asked to participate — has announced its results, based on your typical inverted-point scoring system, and the findings of course offer a fascinating look back at the year of 2006, and plenty of grist for the mill depending on whatever one wishes to argue.
First off, hearty props go out to the erudite Scott Foundas for the marshalling of effort and resources involved. It’s hard to believe it’s the first such undertaking on the part of the 800-pound gorilla that is the L.A. Weekly, but as a former writing, forever hard-charging editor-in-chief myself, I can sympathize with the extra amount of work and time it involves at a time of year that offers precious little breathing room.
Now, some fleeting, on-the-fly analysis: the Top 10 films are an interesting collection, and further proof, in case you needed it, that we film critcs are a wonkish bunch. As far as forward-looking awards prognostication, you can throw out half of the bunch — Jean-Pierre Melville’s Army of Shadows, as well as Three Times, The Death of Mr. Lazarescu, L’Enfant and David Lynch’s Inland Empire, which garnered more than five times as many mentions as Babel. You can unfortunately probably do the same for Paul Greengrass’ brilliant United 93; there’s simply too much old guard resistance to it amongst Academy Award voters, especially those residing in New York City.
Borat was an inspired inclusion at #9, and it was heartening — in its own special way — to see Dreamgirls place… drumroll, please… #66, with only two critical mentions. This reinforces the notion that the movie, its crowd-pleasing elements notwithstanding, is chiefly a collection of performances (Jennifer Hudson’s strident belting, Eddie Murphy’s “James Brown in a hot-tub,” etc.) in search of some believable hurt or love, particularly in its third act.
Best Actor was a tie between Ryan Gosling (Half Nelson) and Sacha Baron Cohen (Borat). Best Actress was Helen Mirren in a runaway, though Laura Dern polled surprisingly strong for Inland Empire, with twice as many tallied points as the next runner-up, Judi Dench (Notes on a Scandal). Best Supporting Actor went to Jackie Earle Haley for Little Children and, in another tie, The Death of Mr. Lazarescu‘s Luminita Gheorghiu and Half Nelson‘s Shareeka Epps placed even in points for Best Supporting Actress, though the former had one more ballot mention. In another great year for non-fiction films, in a vote I could scarcely agree with less, Darwin’s Nightmare took the nod for Best Documentary.
the new movie Venus assays the slow bloom and maturation of a petulant adolescent commoner, and her charged relationship with an aristocratic, aging actor old enough to be her grandfather, and possibly even great-grandfather. The title is a tip of the hat not to beauty in merely the classical sense, but rather the hold and sway that physical attractiveness affords, the advantages it frequently provides. More than ably holding down the screen opposite the legendary Peter O’Toole is newcomer Jodie Whittaker (above right), a 24-year-old recent graduate of the Guildhall School of Music and Drama with but a handful of stage and television credits to her name. Still, says director Roger Michell, Whittaker “ticks all the boxes.” For the full feature piece, from FilmStew, click here.