A polished technical package lends considerable emotional weight to Supremacy, a siege/hostage drama shot through with racial animus. Based on real events, director Deon Taylor’s movie connects largely on the strength of its solid acting and charged stakes, but suffers a bit from muddled plotting and a dramatically diffuse end game. For the full, original review of the Los Angeles Film Festival premiere, from ShockYa, click here. (Hidden Empire Film Group/Media House Capital, unrated, 106 minutes)
Category Archives: Film Reviews
The Signal
Several years ago, in 2011, multi-hyphenate director Evan Glodell and a group of collaborators with whom he shared a long list of short-form collaborations made a weird little film, saturated in feverish tones, called Bellflower. Whatever one thought of that movie itself as a finished narrative product, its construction was so audacious and of a piece as to almost take one’s breath away. The Signal, directed by Will Eubank, is an extraordinarily different work, but one every bit as charged and shot through with cool assurance and technical savvy. It’s the type of indie offering that cuts right through all the noise and clutter, signaling the arrival of undeniable new talents.
Co-written by director Eubank, his brother Carlyle Eubank and David Frigerio, The Signal, which premiered at this year’s Sundance Film Festival, unfolds in confident shorthand strokes, its characterizations winnowed down to spare essences. It starts off as a road trip movie. Nic Eastman (Brenton Thwaites), his girlfriend Haley Peterson (Olivia Cooke) and his friend and fellow MIT student Jonah Breck (Beau Knapp) are heading west when they decide upon a detour. A mysterious hacker known only as “NOMAD” has been messing with Nic and Jonah, and when they’re able to pinpoint his location, they decide to pay an unscheduled visit. Their directions lead them to an isolated area, however. Suddenly, there’s a flash.
When Nic regains consciousness, he finds himself trapped in a waking nightmare. He’s groggy and injured, and sealed off to boot from Haley and Jonah. A doctor in a hazmat suit, Wallace Damon (Laurence Fishburne), keeps Nic in isolation, informing him that he believes he may have come into contact with aliens. Eventually Nic escapes his enclosed compound, but encounters a number of strangers (including Lin Shaye) who force him to further re-evaluate his impressions of his situation.
The Signal is nominally a science-fiction-rooted thriller, but it’s powered by mystery more than incident, and dread more than horror. In this this regard, the first act especially is rapturous. The film as a whole is beautiful, though — an experiential treat. Eubank has a previous directorial credit under his belt (the little-seen Love), but has also served as a second unit director and cinematographer on a variety of features. Collaborating here with cinematographer David Lanzenberg, Eubank delivers a movie with a visual template that is alluring and hypnotic — the cinematic equivalent of a lonely drive down a dark desert highway. Composer Nima Fakhrara assists this evocation of mood with a score — a slow piano leitmotif which incorporates droning elements — that connotes a kind of high-brow menace.
That the film’s narrative eventually paints itself into a bit of a corner is perhaps somewhat expected. It’s here, too, where the representational tack of the movie’s first act comes back to bite it in the rear end just a little. While the performances herein are uniformly great, the plot separates Nic, Haley and Jonah, and when the story brings them back together it feels like too much time has passed. A stronger channeling of subjective point-of-view or, conversely, a slightly more conventionally structured narrative of investigation that keeps our frazzled trio together would have rooted The Signal, and afforded it more emotional punching power.
Still, the dark, involving swirl of this thought-provoking low-budget effort — a blend of Moon, The Blair Witch Project, THX-1138 and Chronicle, among other titles — doesn’t let go of a viewer easily. Even if there are some hiccups in its wind-down, there’s nowhere else one would rather be while watching it. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. (Focus, PG-13, 97 minutes)
The Only Real Game
A stirring nonfiction sociocultural curiosity that taps into the power of sports to bridge divides and develop kinships across incredible distances, director Mirra Bank’s The Only Real Game tells the story of a small pocket of India obsessed with baseball. Narrated by Academy Award winner Melissa Leo, the film is an involving reminder of the fact that ambassadorships need not be political, and that human understanding and connection turns on a much more intimate axis.
The Only Real Game takes place in Manipur, a remote eastern Indian bordering Burma, beset with 25 percent unemployment plus many other problems — not the least of which is violence which has racked the area since a forced territorial merging post-World War II. Nationalist police, under threat of insurgent attack, operate with impunity, often beating and bullying residents indiscriminately. Caught in the middle are normal residents, who have lived under martial law for decades.
In the land of cricket and soccer, baseball arrived on the wings of war, and quickly found a welcome home. American airmen stationed in Manipur after the Japanese bombing of the region in 1942 would stage games on their bases, which were staffed with locals. Baseball caught on — the seeds planted for future generations of fans. (“It means more to me than having a husband,” says one of the many area women obsessed with the game.) With Muriel Peters’ First Pitch non-profit organization spearheading a charity effort, manufacturer Spalding donates a bunch of equipment and Major League Baseball dispatches two special envoys, Dave Palese and Jeff Brueggemann, to head up clinics and help instruct Manipurian coaches and players alike.
Editorially (if somewhat understandably), the film gets tangled up just a bit in the thicket of history and politics. But Bank is quite smart when it comes to interweaving the stories of the American coaches and their Indian counterparts, striking an easy, engaging balance. And she also finds a nice parallel to the stalled or blocked dreams of several native subjects in the story of Brueggemann’s promising pitching career, derailed by a summer job taken out of economic necessity.
As sad as its surrounding reality is, The Only Real Game has the good sense to still locate and indulge a playful and occasionally dark sense of humor. When Brueggemann and several of his cohorts take a trip into a rebel-controlled area to look at habitats that an architect wants to incorporate into the construction of a proper baseball field and complex, a uniformed military officer says, “This area is very calm — a very calm place,” even as a soldier walks by with a shoulder-mounted bazooka.
In an ending admirably devoid of pat, artificial uplift, there’s no way of knowing whether this simple act of outreach and baseball instruction will help bring the community of Manipur jobs, and/or a measure of peace. But The Only Real Game reminds viewers of the power of shared passions, and the ability of so-called trivialities like sports and the arts to transcend borders and false adversarial designations. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. The Only Real Game opens in Los Angeles at the Laemmle Music Hall. For information about other screenings and more information on the film in general, click here to visit the movie’s website. (The Only Real Game Movie LLC, unrated, 82 minutes)
Think Like a Man Too
A busy, energetically pitched ensemble comedy that ultimately elicits more weariness than laughs, director Tim Story’s follow-up to surprise spring 2012 hit Think Like a Man, adapted from Steve Harvey’s 2009 book Act Like a Lady, Think Like a Man, can’t decide whether it wants to assay modern relationships or just thrash around in the wading pool of Las Vegas-set clichés. It settles for waving its arms, making noise and pointing out that change unsettles all of us, men and women.
Returning scribes Keith Merryman and David. A. Newman ably deliver delineated characters. But they’re so busy servicing the various relationship crises of their couples that there’s a paucity of jokes that push past anything other than the most obvious, surface-level set-ups. If the first film traded on friction between established types (e.g., “The Mama’s Boy,” “The Non-Committer,” “The Player,” “The Girl Who Wants the Ring”), the extent to which the advice of Harvey’s book still serves as an inspiration seems here to be limited to a couple rejoinders and a scratchy, ill-fitting voiceover narration from Kevin Hart, in which he randomly invokes basketball analogies.
Story (Barbershop, the Fantastic Four films) is capable of locating humor amidst resonance, but here he seems beholden to some invisible, overcharged pace car, chasing loud, cheap laughs in a manner that reliably undercuts any moments of more emotionally grounded reality. For the full, complete review, from Screen Daily, click here. (Sony/Screen Gems, PG-13, 106 minutes)
Supermensch: The Legend of Shep Gordon
A documentary about its titular talent manager, Supermensch: The Legend of Shep Gordon, directed by writer-actor Mike Myers, has the potential to be a slice of yawning, self-congratulatory star-fuckery of the highest order. After all, in addition to its famous director, it has plenty of recognizable celebrities who all line up to sing the praises of its subject. And yet, thanks to whip-smart pacing, this warm-hearted and unfussy nonfiction valentine emerges as an engaging portrait of a life less ordinary — a man who embraced and promulgated selflessness, even while, in his early days, indulging in druggy partying and frequently sporting a T-shirt that read, “No head, no backstage pass.” For the full, original review, from Paste, click here. (Radius/TWC, R, 84 minutes)
LAFF: Evolution of a Criminal
When one talks about personal filmmaking as a pathway to something special, they’d be hard-pressed to come up with a better example than Evolution of a Criminal, director Darius Clark Monroe’s documentary examination of a bank robbery he committed as a teenager. The winner of the Grand Jury Prize at this year’s Full Frame Film Festival and part of the Summer Showcase section at the Los Angeles Film Festival, the movie — lent his name by executive producer Spike Lee — is an engrossing evocation of poverty in America, as well as, more pointedly, a moving look at redemption and second chances. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. For more information on the film, click here to visit its Facebook page. (Aliquot Films, unrated, 83 minutes)
22 Jump Street
There wasn’t necessarily reason to attach a lot of expectations to 2012’s 21 Jump Street, starring Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum, but the irreverent and self-referential reboot of the same-named, late-1980s TV series that helped launch the career of Johnny Depp delved into young male anxieties and issues of adolescent-adjacent friendship with considerable aplomb. Its sequel, 22 Jump Street, even more fully embraces and explores masculine relationship dynamics, while also wittily working over like a heavyweight’s speed bag Hollywood’s empty-headed love of franchising. Abundant in charm and loose-limbed energy, it’s a guaranteed crowd-pleaser, possessing everything one wants from a big Hollywood studio action-comedy. For the full, original review, from Paste, click here. (Sony, R, 112 minutes)
Dances With Films: 120 Days
A West Coast premiere at the recent Dances With Films Fest, the documentary 120 Days throws an affecting spotlight on the personal side of immigration, telling the story of a man who counts down the final four months with his family while weighing his options facing a federal “voluntary” self-deportation order.
In 1998, Miguel Cortes crossed the Mexican border into the United States. After working for a year, he saved up enough money to send for his wife, Maria Luisa, and two daughters, Yael and Saydrel, paying coyotes to traffic them illegally across the border. In 2005 the family moved to North Carolina, and settled into Raleigh area. They worked hard, paid taxes, broke no laws, settled into the community and enjoyed watching their children grow up.
Things changed when Cortes was stopped by a police officer. Having no driver’s license (banned for illegal immigrants in the state of North Carolina since 2006), he then found himself a victim of an expanded ICE federal mandate, 287(g), which deputizes local law enforcement to check the immigration status of people they pull over. Originally designed to help curb gang-related activity and other violent crimes committed by non-citizen residents, the program is now frequently used as a catch-all to weed out undocumented immigrants of all types. After paying a bond, the judge offers Cortes 120 days to get his affairs in order and return to Mexico. With the clock ticking, Cortes considers leaving his wife and children or changing his name, moving and disappearing into another American city illegally, either alone or with his family.
Contributing occasional narration but otherwise eschewing an investigative tack, director Ted Roach instead chooses to focus more tightly on the Cortes family unit. It’s an approach that yields emotional dividends. Making liberal use of warm home video footage, 120 Days is an atypical family film, but a family film nonetheless — sort of a true-life version, minus the more pronounced criminal desperation and moral compromise, of the same type of razor’s-edge existence dramatized in Chris Weitz’s A Better Life, in which a man goes all-in for the betterment of his loved ones, damn the consequences.
Roach’s film could stand to broaden its focus just a bit — not pulling in talking heads to rehash heated and entrenched positions on the immigration debate, but including more family members. Maria Luisa and the Cortes girls participate freely, and their reminiscences provide the spine of Roach’s film. But it’s revealed late in the movie that two of Maria Luisa’s brothers (and, indeed, many family members) have entered the country illegally, and live in concert with Miguel and Maria Luisa, just across the parking lot in the same apartment complex. While they may have been understandably hesitant to be interviewed on camera, their perspective would have given more clarity to the Cortes’ situation, and also bolstered the strong ribbons of family and community already threaded throughout the movie. This has been the immigrant experience for every ethnic group that has come to America in its history — the development of a pocket of émigrés who support one another, as assimilation then happens by degrees, and the younger generation in particular capitalize on the sacrifices of their parents. Showing the Mexican-American experience of undocumented families to be no different than so many Italian, Irish, Jewish and other families before them would have given the film even stronger resonance.
Still, in addition to its considerable emotional punching power derived from simply watching a loving family being rended apart, 120 Days shows that we as a society can’t and don’t really want to know the full truth about immigration. Cortes is employed gainfully, sings in his church’s choir and works in his community, where he and his wife are honored by the local parks and recreation department for a traditional dance class they teach for youngsters. He has friends who care about him. And he’s the victim of a broken system — but only one of many, sadly. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here; for more information on the movie, click here to visit its website. (Sammy Slate Productions, unrated, 79 minutes)
Dances With Films: Being Awesome
A recent presentation at the Julien International Film Festival and a competition title at the Dances With Films Fest in Los Angeles, well-meaning indie effort Being Awesome cycles through well-worn clichés of stuck-in-a-rut, cusp-of-thirtysomething frustration, but adds nothing much new or of interest to the emotionally-adrift-guys subgenre. Written and directed by Allen C. Gardner, it’s a haphazardly staged, genially plotted tale of navel-gazing masculine woe that shouldn’t see much of a life outside the festival circuit. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here; for more information on the movie, click here to visit its website. (Open Dialogue Productions, unrated, 80 minutes)
Dances With Films: The Jazz Funeral
A world premiere and Grand Jury honorable mention selection at the recently concluded 17th annual Dances With Films Fest, writer-director Jesse Rosen’s The Jazz Funeral is a relaxed, shrewdly observed portrait of the sort of crucible that a lot of young men must pass through in entering into a functional, adult, peer relationship with their father. Smart, modulated performances and a professional, unfussy technical package mark this as a superlative indie effort — one that augurs good things for a lot of the young talent involved. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. (Malvern Productions, unrated, 79 minutes)
Ivory Tower
While renewed calls for a national focus on income inequality, predominantly grounded in a discussion of a minimum wage hike, are met with predictable squeals of “Class warfare!” from barons of industry, perched-on-high professional capitalists and other assorted defenders of the status quo, there’s an important second front in this developing battle — one that can be seen in the emerging populism of Senator Elizabeth Warren, who has made student loan debt (and the attendant profits reaped by federal government programs) one of her pillar issues. The new documentary Ivory Tower dives headlong into this thorny issue, not bemoaning achievement gaps or essaying the relative deterioration of American high schools and the public educational system, but instead asking pointed questions about what it is reasonable to expect from institutions of higher education, and how they may need to be retooled in the digital age.
Directed by Andrew Rossi, Ivory Tower rather clearly venerates college, but not in an empty-headed, reflexive or elitist manner. Rather, it makes a crisp, convincing case for the college classroom and university experience in sum being the ideal rehearsal spaces for democracy — where civility, an open mind and the free and reasoned exchange of contrasting opinions can forge crucial critical thinking and cooperative skills needed in almost every industry. The fiscal imperilment of this experience for future generations, then, is something that should give us all pause.
Utilizing profiles of a variety of institutions, Rossi (Page One: Inside the New York Times) sketches out how colleges in the United States, long regarded as leaders in higher education internationally, have come to embrace a competitive business model that often promotes turnover and expansion over the quality of learning. Akin to the Cold War’s arms race, this boom has been great for construction and layered levels of college and university administration, but without much benefit for students, who are increasingly asked to shoulder greater and greater costs. College tuitions have skyrocketed more than 1120 percent since 1980. This is especially true for state universities, many of whom have seen their endowments slashed and raided to fund Pyrrhic political victories.
The stories herein are edifying and interesting. In addition to examining historically black colleges and so-called “MOOCs” (massive open online courses) from companies like Coursera, Udacity and edX, Ivory Tower also roots down into a radical core premise — the idea of a quality education as a right. To this end, strands looking at Deep Springs College (a free school in California’s Death Valley that extracts a two-year commitment in exchange for labor and community service) and Cooper Union (another free school, established in 1859 by industrialist Peter Cooper and endowed by a lease fee on the land that houses the Chrysler Building) rate among the most interesting. The latter is particularly fascinating, detailing a student revolt against president Jamshed Bharucha when he introduces a plan to start charging tuition following a series of misguided expenditures and failed investments on the part of the board of trustees.
Interweaving an original score from Ian Hultquist that makes evocative use of a simple drum-and-guitar pattern, Rossi delivers a movie engorged at times with feeling, and full of questions for which there are not always necessarily easy real-world answers. Doesn’t that describe the college experience itself, however? Even when monsters and villains of parity and justice can be identified, after all, it doesn’t immediately deliver us a solution. Our mission: try, try again, fail again, fail better. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. For more information on the movie, click here. (Samuel Goldwyn, PG-13, 90 minutes)
Ai Weiwei: The Fake Case
Chronicling some of the very tangible costs of dissident behavior in societies much less freer than ours, Danish filmmaker Andreas Johnsen’s Ai Weiwei: The Fake Case is an absorbing nonfiction look at renowned Chinese multimedia artist Ai Weiwei, who, after just under three months of isolated imprisonment with no formal charges, is transferred to house arrest and put on a year’s probation, barred from giving interviews or having a domestic online presence.
Alison Klayman‘s superb 2012 documentary Ai Weiwei: Never Sorry offered up a much more rounded portrait of the man as an artist, though that film also dealt heavily with the political activism (including spearheading a citizens’ investigation into the more than 5,400 children who were killed in the 2008 Sichuan earthquake, in large part owing to shoddy government construction) which landed Ai in trouble with Chinese authorities. Following a contentious arrest, Klayman’s film actually ends with Ai emerging from his aforementioned confinement. Ai Weiwei: The Fake Case, then, tracks his cautious reemergence and attempts to come to grips with the emotional and physical fallout (sleep difficulties, a fog of depression) stemming from his detention. It’s less a study of China as a society in flux and more an unobtrusive document of roiled personality. For the full, original review, from Paste, click here. (International Film Circuit, unrated, 89 minutes)
Gone Doggy Gone
An amusing, madcap blend of social satire, character comedy and well-worn road trip tropes, Gone Doggy Gone, co-written and directed by Kasi Brown and Brandon Walter, unfolds against the backdrop of a kidnapped canine. The low-budget indie film effectively winds up a bunch of characters who are by degrees self-centered, delusional and inept, and then spends the remainder of its 89-minute running time bouncing them off one another at odd angles, like rubber balls in a stairwell.
The Best of Fest winner at the First Glance Film Fest and the Audience Award winner at the Julien Dubuque International Film Festival in April, Gone Doggy Gone centers on Los Angelenos Abby and Elliott Harmon (Brown and Walter, above), a married professional couple on emotional autopilot who dote on their teacup terrier, Laila, treating her like a baby. After a series of personal and occupational humiliations send their (overly) devoted dog-sitter Jill (Shaina Vorspan) into a tailspin, she snaps and kidnaps Laila, emailing the Harmons a ransom video. Abby and Elliott quickly uncover the truth, but Jill hits the open road. A pursuit follows, with the Harmons’ wisecracking, weed-smoking friend Kat (Kate Connor) tagging along for the ride. After disastrous attempts at interception on their own, along with other assorted mishaps, Abby and Elliott hire Dan (Jeff Sloniker, seemingly channeling John Belushi), a slovenly, bumbling, would-be private investigator who works with his father Stan (Office Space‘s Richard Riehle). As they then nominally tail him and await results, though, Dan becomes smitten with Jill, further feeding a roundelay of misunderstanding and haplessness.
At its core, Gone Doggy Gone has a great concept — something that’s both easily relatable from a comedic perspective and, in the manner in which it essays the way pets are kind of a starter baby for DINK-ers who in earlier generations would’ve already started a family, plugged into the current zeitgeist. Brown and Walter’s instincts encompass plenty of comedy of debasement, but the ranginess and rapid-fire pacing of their work as much as anything else assure that Gone Doggy Gone never loses hold of a viewer’s interest. There are also some great purposefully terrible local commercials and a dream-sequence riff on The Silence of the Lambs, showcasing a canny sense of spoofery.
In its third act — with a pit stop at a hippie friend of Kat’s, and a reversed blackmail plot — the film succumbs a bit to the kitchen-sink instincts of so many independent films, in which bigger and more clamorous is confused with necessarily better. Low-budget films that lack the resources of some of their bigger-budget genre counterparts often seem to reach for hijinks, writ large, in an effort to clinch market salability. The character of Dan, already a bit broadly sketched, figures into the proceedings more and more, but what’s meant to track as a strand of misguided obsession paralleling Jill’s just seems like misspent time. It feels like there’s a slightly more reigned in treatment of the same premise and end game that could have yielded even richer results.
What Gone Doggy Gone has going for it, though, is solid banter writing and some crisp, engaging characterizations and acting. The diminutive and demure Vorspan, playing a character who seems like she’s from a Todd Solondz film by way of the Farrelly brothers (or perhaps the other way around), is a real treat — cracked and vulnerable in a uniquely compelling way. Brown, meanwhile, has the wicked gleam in her eye of a raging, on-the-warpath, manic-sad compulsive, which works well in contrast with Walter’s more baseline, normalized exasperation at the unfolding situation. Ultimately, whether you’re the one who’s pooch-fixated or it’s someone else in your life, the freewheeling absurdism of Gone Doggy Gone will strike a chord of amusement. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here; for more information on the movie, click here to visit its website. (Buzzworm Films, R, 89 minutes)
Korengal
From mid-May 2007 through the summer of the following year, Sebastian Junger and his colleague Tim Hetherington chronicled the deployment of a platoon of American troops in a remote and notoriously deadly Afghanistan valley. The resulting experiential travelogue of war reportage, 2010’s Restrepo, picked up a Grand Jury Prize at the Sundance Film Festival and was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Documentary. The follow-up, Korengal, comes three years after Hetherington was tragically killed covering the civil war in Libya, and builds on the psychological perspicacity of its predecessor, delving in a very simple and direct way into what war and some of its aftereffects feel like. For the full, original review, from Paste, click here. (Saboteur Media/Goldcrest Films/Outpost Films, R, 84 minutes)
Burt’s Buzz
It’s immediately clear by the film’s odd, buzzy opening — the raucous reception of its septuagenarian subject in a Taiwan airport — that Burt’s Buzz isn’t going to be a normal documentary. Unfortunately, though, it turns out to be atypical in a variety of exasperating and ultimately fatal ways. In fact, if there were an upper-level college or film school class specifically about burying the lede, it would be difficult to immediately think of a more fitting example than Jody Shapiro’s nonfiction portrait of an amiably deposed hippie businessman, which putters about aimlessly, getting to its most essential questions only an hour into its running time or leaving them entirely unasked.
Burt’s Buzz ostensibly tells the story of the founder of Burt’s Bees, Burt Shavitz, who lives a penny-pinching existence in rural Maine in a cramped cabin surrounded by antique peculiarities, and opines that “a good day is one when no one shows up and you don’t have to go anywhere.” Fifteen minutes in, though, Burt’s Buzz hasn’t really established his connection to the company (apart from his bearded, crazy-prospector-type likeness), and given that Shavitz evidences a complete and utter lack of entrepreneurial instinct, the audience is left bobbing around like a cork in the ocean, wondering how the hell he got this enterprise off the ground.
Eventually, more than 35 minutes into the movie, the name Roxanne Quimby pops up — a recently divorced mother of two and lapsed graphic artist at the time she met Shavitz and moved in with him in 1984. Using the extra, saved beeswax from hives that Shavitz tended to harvest honey that he would sell out of the back of his truck, Quimby started making candles. They then expanded into other crafts and personal care products, peddling their wares around town and at festivals and the like. Sprinkled throughout the rest of the film, like a dusting of confectionary sugar, are references to a business empire that would top $3 million in sales by 1994, and set up shop in North Carolina. When Shavitz and Quimby split up, she would take the company with her.
Mostly, Burt’s Buzz is just a vehicle for its subject’s laconic charm and heavy-lidded musings; it follows him as he makes a series of personal appearance, handing out free lip balm samples at a Target in Minneapolis, and then traveling abroad, doing interviews with local press and appearing at awkward public Q&As meant to increase brand awareness. Shavitz seems mostly bewildered by all the attention and pretty much disengaged from anyone and everyone with whom he crosses paths, though there’s also an awkward scene where he attempts to thank his Taiwanese guide and translator, and basically ends up petting her.
Shavitz’s assistant theorizes at one point late in the movie that he’s completely emotionally shut down and incapable of basically love of any sort with another human being — something a lot of the footage would seem to support. But director Shapiro — who does talk to Shavitz’s ex-pat brother Carl, five years his junior, who moved to Great Britain in 1966 and never came back — doesn’t delve substantively enough into the root causes of this behavior to drum up anything more than perpetual cusp-of-intrigue diddling. There’s a bit of material on Shavitz’s New York upbringing, but the movie quickly moves on from that. And while it lays out a narrative for how Shavitz came to sign away his company (he got caught cheating with a twentysomething-year-old that worked at one of the company’s stores), there are only half-truths, equivocations and vague references (“Roxanne really wanted to own me, and no one’s ever going to own me — you can rent somebody, but you can’t buy them”) that in the end don’t really tell a viewer a damn thing.
Incurious and eager to please, Burt’s Buzz never digs into why Shavitz is still doing promotional appearances (given his spartan existence, how much money does he really require, or even want?). The waves of plaintive hurt that emanate from its subject hold one’s interest in passages, but basically go nowhere. Then there’s the sort of slimy fact that, since Burt’s Bees — which Quimby sold 80 percent of her stake in for $177 million in 2003 — was actually bought by the Clorox Company in 2007 for over $900 million, Burt’s Buzz is a silent, amiably dumb witness if not outright accomplice to peddling a fundamentally false narrative of the company as still some paragon of Earth-friendly, less-is-more simplicity. More than any deeper understanding of Shavitz that emerges, the feelings that Burt’s Buzz most elicit are those of uncomfortable condescension — at watching thousands upon thousands of Taiwanese being fed a fat shit sandwich of phony American capitalism. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. For more information, click here to visit the movie’s website; Burt’s Buzz opens in Los Angeles at the Laemmle Music Hall. (FilmBuff, unrated, 88 minutes)
The Fault in Our Stars
Director Josh Boone’s adaptation of John Green’s bestselling novel about two teenagers who meet at a cancer support group and fall in love, The Fault in Our Stars is engagingly plotted and anchored by rich characterizations — a swollen tearjerker that confirms the star presence of Shailene Woodley. For the full, original review, from Screen Daily, click here. (20th Century Fox, PG-13, 126 minutes)
The Dance of Reality
The year 2014 is proving to be something of an unlikely renaissance for 85-year-old surrealist filmmaker Alejandro Jodorowsky, who was the central subject of a documentary detailing his vision of a collapsed adaptation of Frank Herbert’s Dune, and now sees the release of his first film in more than two decades, The Dance of Reality. A deeply personal and characteristically weird curated trip through his recreated adolescence, this one-of-a-kind period piece is swollen with mythology, metaphor (political and social), visual poetry… and elliptical tedium. It’s the definition of a niche appeal offering, but the film’s amazing technical orchestration no doubt marks it as the work of a true cineaste. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. (Abkco Films, unrated, 130 minutes)
A Million Ways to Die in the West
In 2012, Ted carried animated impresario and musical enthusiast Seth MacFarlane‘s naughty sensibilities to their natural, R-rated, big screen terminus, and raked in nearly $550 million worldwide. (A sequel, naturally, is in the works for next summer.) With the new comedy A Million Ways To Die in the West, multi-hyphenate MacFarlane heartily affixes a bull’s-eye to his back, starring in his second film behind the camera — a scattershot affair that mixes his characteristically crass and off-kilter sense of humor with affable goofiness and sentimentality. For the full, original review, from Paste, click here. (Universal, R, 116 minutes)
Half of a Yellow Sun
A well-intentioned historical drama that unfolds in the 1960s against the backdrop of the Nigerian Civil War, Half of a Yellow Sun features a couple strong lead performances from Chiwetel Ejiofor and Thandie Newton, plus the sort of high stakes and stark socioeconomic class conflict that often lends itself to engaging adaptation. But the film gets caught up in the undertow of mawkish melodrama early on, never to fully recover. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. (Monterey Media, R, 113 minutes)
The Grand Seduction
It’s easy to grasp the appeal of a movie like The Grand Seduction from the point-of-view of Taylor Kitsch, and/or his agent. After a well received stint on the popular television version of Friday Night Lights, Kitsch was Hollywood-minted as the Next Big Thing, and cast in a string of high-profile studio projects. Then he watched as his two big screen leading man introductions, John Carter and Battleship, were each delivered stillborn within a couple months of one another. Critically derided, they were two of 2012’s biggest domestic box office flops — a fact that surely made it easier to hand the role of Gambit, a character Kitsch portrayed in X-Men Origins: Wolverine, to Channing Tatum for a stand-alone spin-off movie that will be produced later this year.
So The Grand Seduction sort of represents Kitsch’s Kwai-Chang-Caine/wandering-the-Earth phase, if you will — it was the first film he shot in the wake of the fallout of those aforementioned bombs, prior to reteaming with Peter Berg for Lone Survivor. And it’s an odd, twee, character-based slice of rah-rah community dramedy and uplift in which he doesn’t quite fit. But there’s a passably engaging subtextual layer of intrigue to help pass the time if one mentally squints and endeavors to put themselves in Kitsch’s headspace while he was filming two summers ago — playing a character banished to occupational purgatory against his will. For the full, original review, from Paste, click here. (eOne Entertainment, PG-13, 112 minutes)
Oasis Definitely Maybe: The Documentary
In their 14-year recording career, Oasis sold more than 70 million albums worldwide and helped spawn the “BritPop” movement of the 1990s. They also became almost as famous for the frequent intense squabbling and literal fisticuffs between brothers Noel and Liam Gallagher, the primary songwriter and lead singer of the band, respectively. As part of a series of re-mastered reissues of the group’s first three albums, and specifically to celebrate the 20th anniversary of their debut, Definitely Maybe, an hour-long documentary on its creation is now seeing wider release.
Oasis Definitely Maybe: The Documentary charts the crafting of the group’s smash hit freshman effort, in exhaustive if not quite comprehensive detail, if that makes sense. More to the point, director Dick Carruthers struggles with crafting a strong throughline; he seems to avoid the tough questions, and has trouble blending in extant material smoothly. Even though there was considerable tumult before, during and after the recording of the album (drummer Tony McCarroll would get the axe prior to the recording of the group’s follow-up), the film addresses these issues in scattered fashion. Credit is due for raising them at all, but the fact that the Gallaghers — who, notably, are interviewed separately — are largely unwilling to address them directly leaves one feeling that this is still a somewhat incomplete creative portrait, no matter the new slang for drugged-out intoxication (“cabbaged beyond all fucking belief”) it imparts. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. (INGrooves Music Group, unrated, 58 minutes)
Words and Pictures
If it takes well into a person’s twenties before fully absorbing the reality that one’s parents are actual people, with their own hopes and dreams, fears and pressure points, that comprehension, oddly enough, typically comes earlier in regards to teachers, when the veneer of stentorian authority is punctured — either by an instructor’s casual jocularity, some flaming screw-up or their serial challenge to previously unchallenged ideas and mores. Words and Pictures, scripted by Gerald Di Pego and directed by Fred Schepisi with an aplomb that belies its hyper-charged emotionality, centers on two such characters.
And in doing so, it offers a fairly rich, playful vehicle for Clive Owen and Juliette Binoche to parry and thrust, and maybe even fall in love. Fans of smart adult romantic comedies (this is easily the sort of picture one could imagine Meg Ryan and Billy Crystal starring in together about 20 or 25 years ago) with a pinch of screwball mojo will find reward in Words and Pictures, which reminds viewers that life doesn’t end at 40 years of age, or even 50. For the full, original review, from Paste, click here. (Roadside Attractions, PG-13, 116 minutes)
The Love Punch
With only a few very notable exceptions, Pierce Brosnan has spent his career playing guys in suits — both figuratively and literally. Sometimes he’s an asshole or glad-hander in a cheap suit, though most of the time he’s a rich, unflappable character who could easily jump in and substitute for the real-life Brosnan in one of his luxury wristwear photo shoots. His latest film, writer-director Joel Hopkins‘ adult caper flick The Love Punch, in which the actor stars opposite Emma Thompson and contrives to stick it to the (French)man by stealing a $10 million diamond, dresses him the same, which is to say nattily, but makes use of this persona in contrasting, effective fashion.
It’s not at all the first time Brosnan has dabbled in romantic comedy, but it is amongst his broadest, most loose-limbed efforts, which helps elevate The Love Punch from trifle to an at times oddly endearing, diversionary romp that will take viewers’ affections exactly as far as their openhearted affinity for its leads carries them. After all, retirees still need a genre yarn every now and then, right? For the full, original review, from Paste, click here. (Ketchup Entertainment, PG-13, 94 minutes)
The Angriest Man in Brooklyn
Robin Williams was initially the frontrunner for the starring role in director Phil Alden Robinson’s Field of Dreams, so perhaps, 25 years later, The Angriest Man in Brooklyn represents some sort of karmic closure for that collaboration that never was. It certainly doesn’t connect on any other level. A flaky, contrived and wearying dramedy in which a dying man (Williams) frantically tries to right the fractured relationships in his life while an equally frazzled doctor (Mila Kunis) tries to track him down in order to clarify the reading of his diagnosis, this clamorous offering — a remake of the 1997 Israeli film The 92 Minutes of Mr. Baum — fails to elicit much in the way of either laughs or sympathy. The Angriest Man in Brooklyn could be shot through with frustration and rage and still possess the sort of subtlety that would lend it a real-world rootedness. But screenwriter Daniel Taplitz’s adaptation is thinly imagined, and lacking enough of the sort of quiet moments that would lend these characters much-needed dimensionality. Robinson, meanwhile, seems only too happy to let his actors lean on histrionics. For the full, original review, from Screen Daily, click here. (Lionsgate, R, 84 minutes)
Forev
In co-directors Molly Green and James Leffler’s Forev, an indie ode to the decidedly poor decision-making skills of twentysomethings, Los Angeleno Sophie Potts (Noël Wells, of Saturday Night Live) impulsively accepts the marriage proposal of her apartment neighbor, dweeby tech support jockey Pete Avery (Matt Mider), and the pair then promptly head off on a six-hour drive to Phoenix to pick up Pete’s sister Jess (Amanda Bauer) from college. Musing and drinking ensues, and when Jess, fresh off a break-up, indulges in a one-night stand during a car-breakdown stay-over, things get weird for all.
If Forev, a world premiere at last year’s Los Angeles Film Festival, sounds like pretty much the most stereotypical slice of precious, shoegazing wire-frame indie storytelling, well, it is. The movie’s story credits Mider and Wells with “additional screenplay material,” owing to their improvisational talents. And it’s certainly true that the pair (especially Wells) stumble upon a few winningly awkward reactions in their odd, fumbling courtship. But there’s nothing particularly deep or compelling about these characterizations, and co-writers Green and Leffler seem like they can hardly be bothered to sketch out the film’s few inciting incidents (it takes a good 10 minutes before it’s definitively established that Pete’s car is actually broken down).
Forev basically substitutes very familiar road trip narrative meandering and a couple music video montages for rigorous plotting or insights. There’s no grounded reality with respect to how guys act in situations with both their girlfriends and female siblings (“My girls!” exclaims Pete, when Sophie and Jess each emerge in bathing suits), and Green and Leffler seem allergic to making Jess too pushy or judgmental about her brother’s relationship, which abets a pungent odor of phoniness that envelopes an already flimsy conceit.
Most crucially, Forev doesn’t go for “the full Napoleon Dynamite,” which is to say that — even though it throws in a few weirdo supporting characters — it avoids diving headlong into the creation of its own canted universe. Forev is ostensibly supposed to unfold in the real world, and yet as the movie progresses it doesn’t attach itself in any substantive manner to a deeper exploration of Sophie and Pete’s second thoughts and regret over their rash embrace of one another. There’s nothing to really get one’s dander up over Forev, and attach a lot of poisonous animosity of opinion to, but the film just doesn’t work, and its shortcomings track with the sort of material that takes its cues from trying too hard to ape other movies. The players here may have talent, but Forev almost willfully obscures it. For the full, original review, from ShockYa, click here. For more information on the film, which is available on all major cable VOD providers, as well as iTunes, DVD and Blu-ray, click here to visit its website. (Gravitas Ventures/Mance Media, R, 88 minutes)