Shared Darkness
A Communal Life in Film and DVD, Examined

Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired

Print the article

This entry was posted on 6/6/2008 6:15 AM and is filed under Film Reviews.


Admired and respected as one of the world's great film artisans, Roman Polanski has led a life full of its own dramatically cinematic highs and lows. Now a happily settled and seemingly at-peace family man, he's been a Holocaust survivor, a brash raconteur and l'enfant terrible, an Oscar-winning director, a shockingly sudden widower and a fugitive felon. It's the latter description, of course, that still hangs most heavily over him — the result of a 1977 guilty plea for unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor — and that's the subject of the new documentary Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired, premiering this week on HBO.



Chock full of infrequently reported intriguing details (the incident took place at Jack Nicholson's house, while he was out of town) and some speculative sidebar analysis (the prosecutor ruminates on "corruption winning out over innocence in or over water" in all of Polanski's films up to that point), Wanted and Desired is a fascinating exploration of a complicated case that is still hugely misunderstood. Serving as both a differential snapshot of the law from a bygone era and a warts-and-all exploration of the case and its bizarre, messy aftermath (European press tended to see Polanski as a tragic, brilliant figure, and forgive his faults; one American writer covering the case called the director a "malignant, twisted dwarf"), the movie opens with a statement that at first blush seems a self-pitying stretch, with the filmmaker subject, in an archival interview snippet, comparing himself to "a mouse that's being toyed with by an abominable cat." Remarkably, while not excusing the crime, director Marina Zenovich slowly shows that to be more or less true.

Like many, Zenovich  at first knew only the barest details of the case: contracted by a European fashion magazine, Polanski had arranged for a private photo shoot with the then 13-year-old Geimer, signed off on by Geimer's mother. Charged with a litany of felony counts, including providing drugs to a minor, he later plead guilty to one count, and fled the country before sentencing. What Zenovich found out, though, was that Polanski actually served six weeks in Chino State Penitentiary for psychological analysis, as part of a strange, elongated pas de trois between legal counsel and adjudicator.

This isn't a revelation in and of itself, of course, just an underreported fact from the past, but how the case arrived at that point in an era of indeterminate sentencing — where Polanski could have been sent to jail from anywhere from six months to 50 years — is a twisted story of play-acted justice. For that, Polanski needs a foil, and while Wanted and Desired is indeed awash in grey in the picture it delivers of Polanski, one of the more interesting characters that emerges is the judge in the case. Laurence Rittenband had previously shown an inclination for the spotlight, requesting and receiving oversight of paternity suits against Spencer Tracy and Marlon Brando, among other celebrity cases. His strange and overly solicitous courtship of the media turned what was already a circus — with European press, not bound by victim confidentiality rules, descending on Geimer's school and outing her identity — into something even more surreal and fatally flawed. (As an interesting sidebar, lifelong bachelor Rittenbrand also had at least two girlfriends — "one for the cooking and one for the other stuff, he once explained to a friend — one of whom was 30 years younger than him.)

A riveting examination of the story behind the sound-bite, Wanted and Desired is superbly constructed with archival footage and modern day interviews, and is notable for the unanimity it locates amidst all the murky morality of the situation. Even prosecutor Roger Gunson, a straight-arrow Mormon who would eventually publicly side with defense attorney Doug Dalton in some of the more explosive allegations regarding the handling of the case, says that under the circumstances he's not surprised Polanski fled. As for Polanski, one can abhor the crime, but still glimpse the pathology that informed it, dating back to the brutal 1969 murder of his pregnant fiancée, Sharon Tate. As he revealingly says in a rare interview with Clive James from 1984 which bookends the film, “Well, different people deal with things in different ways — some go to whorehouses, some go to monasteries." (HBO/ThinkFILM, unrated, 99 minutes)

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
    • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.