Shared Darkness
A Communal Life in Film and DVD, Examined

Clinton, Obama and Presidential Maneuvering

Print the article

This entry was posted on 1/10/2008 7:25 AM and is filed under Politics,Musings.


Gazing past the silver screen and into the real world, The Atlantic has up a fascinating piece by Marc Ambinder in which he assays the behind-the-scenes run-up and laid track of the presidential campaigns of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, as well as some of their strategies and inner workings even now. It's the rich detail of involving novels, stuff you could never really cram into a film about politics, no matter how exacting and "inside-the-Beltway."



The article offers up a story of dueling war rooms, shrewd fund-raising battles and surprising allies (for one, the Hillary camp's back-channel alliance with Matt Drudge, who helped break the Monica Lewinsky story, and rode it with an unrivaled fervor), but also very much more than that. It's an allegorical story of plotting, entitlement, and not seeing the forest through the trees.

Clearly, Obama's populist candidacy has threatened to upend the Clintons' painstakingly constructed political applecart, as well as the way politicians have traditionally pursued the presidency — through years of careful preparation and positioning. "I think there’s no doubt that it would be easier for a lot of people in Washington if I had decided that I was going to take a pass and wait my appropriate turn," says Obama in the piece. "[That] might be, from their perspective, 10 years from now — or at least once the Clintons had exhausted all possibilities of running any further."

The above accompanying photo, from John Gress of Reuters, actually sums it up nicely — the Clintons' simultaneous disdain for and disbelief at Obama's meteoric rise. (In the preparatory months leading up to Hillary's campaign launch, they were focused on sharpening their talons to fend off the more obvious challenge by John Edwards.) Part of the grand strategy for Hillary Clinton’s run at the White House was to build a movement around her gender and the possibility of electing the first female president. Mark Penn, the Clinton campaign's visionary pollster, believed that presenting Clinton’s candidacy as a historic occasion would re-inspire voters badly disillusioned after eight years of George W. Bush. But Obamathe first nationally viable African-American candidate, and one possessing the charisma to enthuse potential voters about rising to make history, however implicitly — assumed the symbolic role that Clinton’s team had in mind for her. For the full read, click here.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

    • 1/10/2008 5:17 PM Anonymous wrote:
      The cover story from that same issue is a very cogent argument for why Barack Obama matters. Andrew Sullivan's "Goodbye to All That" : Link http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200712/obama
      Reply to this
    • 2/19/2008 11:46 AM Philsetto wrote:
      That is an interesting piece by SUllivan, but lost in the argument is the fact that Hillary's experience is for real. Of course, she hasn't helped herself in advancing this sort of debate by being so secretive about her White House years papers, etcetera. If she would own up to that and just take the bad WITH all the good, I think it would make a difference with all this love for Obama. Or maybe if she'd done so earlier, I don't know. Maybe it's too late now.
      Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.