Ghost Rider




Pointing out that Ghost Rider is not very good seems like a fool’s exercise, especially now. After all, it’s easy to decry the messenger, especially when a movie’s Presidents’ Day weekend release generates a record-setting gross of $51.5 million. Still, the subgenre of comic book adaptations needn’t automatically lend itself to critical derision, as the warm critical embrace of the Spider-Man films, Christopher Nolan’s Batman reboot or even the more mixed but passionate critics’ defenses of graphic novel flicks like V For Vendetta and Sin City fittingly demonstrate.

Ghost Rider, though, is a glossy, big-budget affair that in almost every significant way behind the camera — and in more than a few ways in front of it — feels like both a fatally compromised and hopelessly amateurish production. This is the type of film which the actors involved carefully describe in press junkets and interviews as “a lot of fun” rather than good. They talk about how much they enjoyed making it instead of how they’re proud of it. For the full review from FilmStew, including reactions of a paying general audience, click here.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 3/9/2007 12:53 AM VanGumby wrote:
    "Ghost Rider" is a turd, and a disservice to its source material. Mark Steven Johnson needs a one-way ticket out of Hollywood... stat!
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.