Shared Darkness
A Communal Life in Film and DVD, Examined

Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning

Print the article

This entry was posted on 10/9/2006 8:10 AM and is filed under Film Reviews.




A lot of modern horror has become more synonymous with horrifying rather than terrifying — the chief difference being the latter is something that grips you on a base, visceral level certainly, but also provokes significant feelings of psychological unease. The gulf between these two approaches is roundly apparent in The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning, a stalking franchise prequel of near-bottomless sadism and equal pointlessness.

Grotesquerie and graphic bloodletting figured prominently into Marcus Nispel’s 2003 remake of director Tobe Hooper’s gritty, groundbreaking 1974 horror picture, but never overwhelmed the predominant emotion — a choking hopelessness — that made the movie so wrenchingly effective, and feel like one big, long, coarse exhalation. The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning, on the other hand, is full of only desultory jump scares and abattoir torture. It doesn’t generate genuine tension; it’s gore pornography, plain and simple.

Genre loyalists should still turn out in droves opening weekend for what’s perceived as a faithful article, but with the releases of The Grudge 2 and Saw III on the horizon, it’s very doubtful that The Beginning will be able to approach the grosses of its 2003 predecessor, which pulled in $80 million domestically and another $26 million internationally. That film, after all, had the swelling intrigue of a franchise reboot, as well as both an advertising campaign and some modicum of word-of-mouth that pointed up the picture’s based-on-true-events roots, which helped extend its audience.

The Beginning’s margins should be smaller and more staunchly of a piece with the traditional core horror base, meaning theatrical returns more inline with Boogeyman, The Hills Have Eyes, Hostel or The Amityville Horror, which collectively averaged around $50 million Stateside.

Directed by Jonathan Liebesman (Darkness Falls) and set in 1969, the movie centers on two brothers, Eric and Dean (Matt Bomer and Taylor Handley), headed across the state of Texas to report for duty in Vietnam. In tow are their respective girlfriends, Chrissie and Bailey (Jordana Brewster and Diora Baird). An auto accident during a would-be robbery leaves the quartet badly injured, but when an apparent lawman, Sheriff Hoyt (R. Lee Ermey), arrives on the scene things only get worse.

Sheriff Hoyt isn’t a sheriff at all, but the patriarch of the twisted, cannibalistic Hewitt clan, which includes his disfigured, mentally challenged nephew Thomas, aka Leatherface (Andrew Bryniarski). Hoyt takes Eric, Dean and Bailey with him back to his house, where an unremittingly grim regimen of torment commences. Thrown from the vehicle, Chrissie eventually makes her way to the house with a local biker (Lee Tergesen), and tries to save her friends.

The screenplay from Sheldon Turner (2005’s The Longest Yard remake) tosses out a few trivial, unifying tidbits (Leatherface was deposited in a dumpster after his mother’s death upon his birth, and we see him craft his first titular mask), but these morsels feel less like grand and/or illuminating character revelations and more like arbitrary filler between torture and killings. Exactly who, after all, has been clamoring for answers to these questions, particularly when the explanations are so cursory?

Such digressions feel wan for two reasons. First, because Leatherface is not a prototypal horror villain protagonist in the same sense as Friday the 13th’s Jason or A Nightmare on Elm Street’s Freddy, and secondly, because the movie treats Leatherface as a morbid, lethal caged circus curiosity. Hoyt is very much the central figure in the movie, calling Leatherface out only when he needs to have him pound on and/or cut up someone.

The film is furthermore damned by its own lack of interior logic and cleanly defined spatial relationships, most notably in the third act. At one point Dean turns the tables on Hoyt, but — seemingly only since the ending is predetermined by the survival of characters we’ve seen in the 2003 movie — implausibly doesn’t finish Hoyt off. Dean also then magically appears during an off-site confrontation between Chrissie and Leatherface, who’s previously shown no sort of skulking wherewithal to dispense with one victim in the manner that he does.

Cinematographer Lukas Ettlin (the American remake of The Grudge) can’t match the anguished antebellum junkyard palettes of Daniel Pearl, who shot the 1974 original and its recent solid re-imagining. Composer Steve Jablonsky’s score, meanwhile, further hammers home the obvious in offending, exaggerated fashion. (New Line, R, 89 minutes)

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
    • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.